Validation of artificial defects for Non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structure
Non-destructive testing was established over the last decades as an important tool for assessing damages, material characterization and quality assurance in civil engineering. For example, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) can be used to scan large areas of concrete structures to determine the spatial...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2018-01-01
|
Series: | MATEC Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819906006 |
id |
doaj-bfed88e4e7e84e3386245bf2f0070d25 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bfed88e4e7e84e3386245bf2f0070d252021-02-02T00:38:21ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011990600610.1051/matecconf/201819906006matecconf_iccrrr2018_06006Validation of artificial defects for Non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structureStefan Maack0Salvador Villalobos1David Scott2Bundesanstalt fuer Materialforschung und -pruefung (BAM), Non-Destructive Testing, Editorial DepartmentElectric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Advances Nuclear Technology (ANT)Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Advances Nuclear Technology (ANT)Non-destructive testing was established over the last decades as an important tool for assessing damages, material characterization and quality assurance in civil engineering. For example, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) can be used to scan large areas of concrete structures to determine the spatial position of the reinforcement. With the ultrasonic echo method, the thickness of concrete structures can be easily determined even if a high density of reinforcement is given. Various methods and processes have been developed for the validation of NDT procedures aiming at ensuring the quality of measurements in practical use. The Probability of Detection (POD) for example, is an available method to compare different technical devices with each other quantitatively regarding their performance. With this method, the best suited testing device for a specific inspection task under defined boundary conditions can be selected. By using the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), it is possible to quantify the measurement uncertainty of an inspection procedure for a specific task. Another important aspect to improve the acceptance of Non-destructive testing methods is the development of reference specimens. Reference specimens serve for the calibration and further development of NDT methods under realistic conditions in different laboratories under the same conditions. A particular challenge here is the most realistic representation of a damage that can occur at building sites. Possible damages include for example horizontal and vertical cracks or honeycombs in concrete. Such a reference structure was built for the development of a new design of power plant constructions. Comparative studies on the manufacturing of realistic honeycombs and delaminations were carried out in advance on a test specimen. The results of this study are presented here.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819906006 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Stefan Maack Salvador Villalobos David Scott |
spellingShingle |
Stefan Maack Salvador Villalobos David Scott Validation of artificial defects for Non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structure MATEC Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Stefan Maack Salvador Villalobos David Scott |
author_sort |
Stefan Maack |
title |
Validation of artificial defects for Non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structure |
title_short |
Validation of artificial defects for Non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structure |
title_full |
Validation of artificial defects for Non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structure |
title_fullStr |
Validation of artificial defects for Non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structure |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of artificial defects for Non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structure |
title_sort |
validation of artificial defects for non-destructive testing measurements on a reference structure |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
MATEC Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-236X |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Non-destructive testing was established over the last decades as an important tool for assessing damages, material characterization and quality assurance in civil engineering. For example, Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) can be used to scan large areas of concrete structures to determine the spatial position of the reinforcement. With the ultrasonic echo method, the thickness of concrete structures can be easily determined even if a high density of reinforcement is given. Various methods and processes have been developed for the validation of NDT procedures aiming at ensuring the quality of measurements in practical use. The Probability of Detection (POD) for example, is an available method to compare different technical devices with each other quantitatively regarding their performance. With this method, the best suited testing device for a specific inspection task under defined boundary conditions can be selected. By using the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), it is possible to quantify the measurement uncertainty of an inspection procedure for a specific task. Another important aspect to improve the acceptance of Non-destructive testing methods is the development of reference specimens. Reference specimens serve for the calibration and further development of NDT methods under realistic conditions in different laboratories under the same conditions. A particular challenge here is the most realistic representation of a damage that can occur at building sites. Possible damages include for example horizontal and vertical cracks or honeycombs in concrete. Such a reference structure was built for the development of a new design of power plant constructions. Comparative studies on the manufacturing of realistic honeycombs and delaminations were carried out in advance on a test specimen. The results of this study are presented here. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819906006 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stefanmaack validationofartificialdefectsfornondestructivetestingmeasurementsonareferencestructure AT salvadorvillalobos validationofartificialdefectsfornondestructivetestingmeasurementsonareferencestructure AT davidscott validationofartificialdefectsfornondestructivetestingmeasurementsonareferencestructure |
_version_ |
1724313425096474624 |