Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?

Introduction: Walking as regular physical activity (PA) is central to healthy aging, and environments influence walking. Multilevel neighborhood-based studies that only report average (fixed-effect) walking differences for gender and age implicitly assume that neighborhood environments influence the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. Ghani, J.N. Rachele, S. Washington, G. Turrell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-12-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335516300316
id doaj-bfe910ee364e465a92e87c62efdd8081
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bfe910ee364e465a92e87c62efdd80812020-11-25T01:23:34ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552016-12-0147580Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?F. Ghani0J.N. Rachele1S. Washington2G. Turrell3Institute for Health & Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Level 6, 215 Spring Street, VIC 3000, Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Brisbane, Australia; Corresponding author at: Institute for Health & Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Level 6, 215 Spring Street, VIC 3000, Melbourne, Australia.Institute for Health & Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Level 6, 215 Spring Street, VIC 3000, Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Brisbane, AustraliaSchool of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Science and Engineering Faculty, Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, 2 George St, QLD 4000 Brisbane, AustraliaInstitute for Health & Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Level 6, 215 Spring Street, VIC 3000, Melbourne, Australia; School of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4059, Brisbane, AustraliaIntroduction: Walking as regular physical activity (PA) is central to healthy aging, and environments influence walking. Multilevel neighborhood-based studies that only report average (fixed-effect) walking differences for gender and age implicitly assume that neighborhood environments influence the walking behavior of men and women, and younger and older persons, similarly. This study tests this assumption by examining whether gender and age differences in walking for transport (WfT) and walking for recreation (WfR) are similar or different across neighborhoods. Methods: This paper used data from the HABITAT multilevel study, with 7,866 participants aged 42–68 years in 2009 living in 200 neighborhoods in Brisbane, Australia. Respondents reported minutes spent WfT and WfR in the previous week, categorized as: none (0 mins), low (1–59mins), moderate (60–149mins) and high (≥150 mins). Multilevel multinomial logistic models were used to estimate average differences in walking by gender and age, followed by random coefficients to examine neighborhood variation in these individual-level relationships. Results: On average, women were more likely to engage in WfR at moderate and high levels (no gender differences found in WfT); and older persons were less likely to do WfT and more likely to do high levels of WfR. These average (Brisbane-wide) relationships varied significantly across neighborhoods. Conclusion: Relationships between gender and walking, and age and walking, are not the same in all neighborhoods, (i.e. the Brisbane average conceals important information) suggesting that neighborhood-level factors differentially influence the walking behaviors of men and women and younger and older persons. Identifying these factors should be a priority for future research. Keywords: Walking, Recreation, Transportation, Neighborhood environment, Age, Genderhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335516300316
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author F. Ghani
J.N. Rachele
S. Washington
G. Turrell
spellingShingle F. Ghani
J.N. Rachele
S. Washington
G. Turrell
Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?
Preventive Medicine Reports
author_facet F. Ghani
J.N. Rachele
S. Washington
G. Turrell
author_sort F. Ghani
title Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?
title_short Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?
title_full Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?
title_fullStr Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?
title_full_unstemmed Gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: Are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?
title_sort gender and age differences in walking for transport and recreation: are the relationships the same in all neighborhoods?
publisher Elsevier
series Preventive Medicine Reports
issn 2211-3355
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Introduction: Walking as regular physical activity (PA) is central to healthy aging, and environments influence walking. Multilevel neighborhood-based studies that only report average (fixed-effect) walking differences for gender and age implicitly assume that neighborhood environments influence the walking behavior of men and women, and younger and older persons, similarly. This study tests this assumption by examining whether gender and age differences in walking for transport (WfT) and walking for recreation (WfR) are similar or different across neighborhoods. Methods: This paper used data from the HABITAT multilevel study, with 7,866 participants aged 42–68 years in 2009 living in 200 neighborhoods in Brisbane, Australia. Respondents reported minutes spent WfT and WfR in the previous week, categorized as: none (0 mins), low (1–59mins), moderate (60–149mins) and high (≥150 mins). Multilevel multinomial logistic models were used to estimate average differences in walking by gender and age, followed by random coefficients to examine neighborhood variation in these individual-level relationships. Results: On average, women were more likely to engage in WfR at moderate and high levels (no gender differences found in WfT); and older persons were less likely to do WfT and more likely to do high levels of WfR. These average (Brisbane-wide) relationships varied significantly across neighborhoods. Conclusion: Relationships between gender and walking, and age and walking, are not the same in all neighborhoods, (i.e. the Brisbane average conceals important information) suggesting that neighborhood-level factors differentially influence the walking behaviors of men and women and younger and older persons. Identifying these factors should be a priority for future research. Keywords: Walking, Recreation, Transportation, Neighborhood environment, Age, Gender
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335516300316
work_keys_str_mv AT fghani genderandagedifferencesinwalkingfortransportandrecreationaretherelationshipsthesameinallneighborhoods
AT jnrachele genderandagedifferencesinwalkingfortransportandrecreationaretherelationshipsthesameinallneighborhoods
AT swashington genderandagedifferencesinwalkingfortransportandrecreationaretherelationshipsthesameinallneighborhoods
AT gturrell genderandagedifferencesinwalkingfortransportandrecreationaretherelationshipsthesameinallneighborhoods
_version_ 1725121368783060992