Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (SIVE): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine

Background: Globally, seasonal influenza is responsible for an estimated 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness and 250,000 to 500,000 deaths per year. It is uncertain to what extent national vaccination programmes can prevent this morbidity and mortality. Objective: To determine the effectiveness o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CR Simpson, N Lone, K Kavanagh, LD Ritchie, C Robertson, A Sheikh, J McMenamin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: NIHR Journals Library 2013-11-01
Series:Health Services and Delivery Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr01100
id doaj-bfdf8a109b334fa6bdbf20f4b6aa171a
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author CR Simpson
N Lone
K Kavanagh
LD Ritchie
C Robertson
A Sheikh
J McMenamin
spellingShingle CR Simpson
N Lone
K Kavanagh
LD Ritchie
C Robertson
A Sheikh
J McMenamin
Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (SIVE): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine
Health Services and Delivery Research
author_facet CR Simpson
N Lone
K Kavanagh
LD Ritchie
C Robertson
A Sheikh
J McMenamin
author_sort CR Simpson
title Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (SIVE): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine
title_short Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (SIVE): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine
title_full Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (SIVE): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine
title_fullStr Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (SIVE): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (SIVE): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine
title_sort seasonal influenza vaccine effectiveness (sive): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine
publisher NIHR Journals Library
series Health Services and Delivery Research
issn 2050-4349
2050-4357
publishDate 2013-11-01
description Background: Globally, seasonal influenza is responsible for an estimated 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness and 250,000 to 500,000 deaths per year. It is uncertain to what extent national vaccination programmes can prevent this morbidity and mortality. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Design: We undertook a retrospective observational cohort study. A propensity score model was constructed and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess differences in vaccine uptake according to a number of patient characteristics. Adjusted illness and mortality hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic status, smoking status, urban/rural location, clinical at-risk groups (i.e. patients with chronic respiratory, heart, kidney, liver or neurological disease, immunosuppression and diabetes), Charlson comorbidity index, previous pneumococcal and influenza vaccination, and number of previous primary care consultations, prescribed drugs and hospital admissions. We also included nursing home residence and social care support. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was expressed as a percentage, and represents a reduction in risk provided by the vaccine for a given outcome (e.g. laboratory-confirmed influenza). This was calculated as 1 − HR, where HR is that of the measured clinical outcome in vaccinated compared with unvaccinated individuals. For estimates of VE derived from linked virological swab data, we carried out a nested case–control study design. Setting: A national linkage of patient-level primary care, hospital, death certification and virological swab-linked data across nine influenza seasons (2000–9). Participants: A nationally representative sample of the Scottish population during 1,767,919 person-seasons of observation. Cases of influenza were confirmed using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a subset of the population (n = 3323). Interventions: Trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccination (n = 274,071). Main outcome measures: VE, pooled across seasons and adjusting for confounders, was estimated by determining laboratory-confirmed influenza, influenza-related morbidity and mortality including primary care influenza-like illnesses, hospitalisation and death from influenza and pneumonia. Results: Most vaccines (93.6%; n = 256,474 vaccines) were administered to at-risk patients targeted for vaccination, with a 69.3% uptake among those aged ≥ 65 years (178,754 vaccinations during 258,100 person-seasons). For at-risk patients aged < 65 years there was a 26.2% uptake (77,264 vaccinations during 295,116 person-seasons). VE in preventing RT-PCR laboratory-confirmed influenza was 57.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.3% to 73.3%]. VE was 18.8% (95% CI –103.7% to 67.6%) in patients aged ≥ 65 years and 59.6% (95% CI 21.9% to 79.1%) in those aged < 65 years at risk of serious complications from influenza. In the matched analysis (156,096 person-seasons), adjusted VE for reducing primary care consultations for influenza-like illnesses was 16.3% (95% CI 5.7% to 26.0%). VE in reducing hospitalisations was 19.3% for influenza and pneumonia (95% CI 8.3% to 29.1%) and 26.7% for pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (95% CI 19.8% to 32.9%). VE in reducing death due to influenza and pneumonia was 37.9% (95% CI 29.5% to 45.4%). Conclusions: Few countries' health systems allow for the integrated and accessible data recording that made this study possible and made it feasible to collate centrally almost all hospitalisations and deaths attributed to influenza, thereby allowing completeness of reporting. Using these data, we found most influenza vaccines were administered to those at risk of serious complications from influenza. In a nationally representative cohort we found that the vaccine was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of RT-PCR-confirmed influenza (the decrease was substantial particularly for at-risk patients aged < 65 years) and complications arising from influenza (where more modest decreases were found). Although the modest size of our cohort made it possible to collate centrally almost all cases of influenza-related disease, analysis of subgroups (in particular older age groups) or by individual season resulted in poorer precision and wide CIs. Any future work should therefore aim to address this issue by ensuring adequate power to test VE in these subgroups of patients, while minimising the effect of bias, such as health-seeking behaviour. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
url https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr01100
work_keys_str_mv AT crsimpson seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenesssiveanobservationalretrospectivecohortstudyexploitationofauniquecommunitybasednationallinkeddatabasetodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheseasonaltrivalentinfluenzavaccine
AT nlone seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenesssiveanobservationalretrospectivecohortstudyexploitationofauniquecommunitybasednationallinkeddatabasetodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheseasonaltrivalentinfluenzavaccine
AT kkavanagh seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenesssiveanobservationalretrospectivecohortstudyexploitationofauniquecommunitybasednationallinkeddatabasetodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheseasonaltrivalentinfluenzavaccine
AT ldritchie seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenesssiveanobservationalretrospectivecohortstudyexploitationofauniquecommunitybasednationallinkeddatabasetodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheseasonaltrivalentinfluenzavaccine
AT crobertson seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenesssiveanobservationalretrospectivecohortstudyexploitationofauniquecommunitybasednationallinkeddatabasetodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheseasonaltrivalentinfluenzavaccine
AT asheikh seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenesssiveanobservationalretrospectivecohortstudyexploitationofauniquecommunitybasednationallinkeddatabasetodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheseasonaltrivalentinfluenzavaccine
AT jmcmenamin seasonalinfluenzavaccineeffectivenesssiveanobservationalretrospectivecohortstudyexploitationofauniquecommunitybasednationallinkeddatabasetodeterminetheeffectivenessoftheseasonaltrivalentinfluenzavaccine
_version_ 1724891759398354944
spelling doaj-bfdf8a109b334fa6bdbf20f4b6aa171a2020-11-25T02:16:14ZengNIHR Journals LibraryHealth Services and Delivery Research2050-43492050-43572013-11-0111010.3310/hsdr0110009/2000/37Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness (SIVE): an observational retrospective cohort study – exploitation of a unique community-based national-linked database to determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent influenza vaccineCR Simpson0N Lone1K Kavanagh2LD Ritchie3C Robertson4A Sheikh5J McMenamin6Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKAllergy and Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UKCentre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UKDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UKAllergy and Respiratory Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKHealth Protection Scotland, Glasgow, UKBackground: Globally, seasonal influenza is responsible for an estimated 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness and 250,000 to 500,000 deaths per year. It is uncertain to what extent national vaccination programmes can prevent this morbidity and mortality. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of the seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Design: We undertook a retrospective observational cohort study. A propensity score model was constructed and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess differences in vaccine uptake according to a number of patient characteristics. Adjusted illness and mortality hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic status, smoking status, urban/rural location, clinical at-risk groups (i.e. patients with chronic respiratory, heart, kidney, liver or neurological disease, immunosuppression and diabetes), Charlson comorbidity index, previous pneumococcal and influenza vaccination, and number of previous primary care consultations, prescribed drugs and hospital admissions. We also included nursing home residence and social care support. Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was expressed as a percentage, and represents a reduction in risk provided by the vaccine for a given outcome (e.g. laboratory-confirmed influenza). This was calculated as 1 − HR, where HR is that of the measured clinical outcome in vaccinated compared with unvaccinated individuals. For estimates of VE derived from linked virological swab data, we carried out a nested case–control study design. Setting: A national linkage of patient-level primary care, hospital, death certification and virological swab-linked data across nine influenza seasons (2000–9). Participants: A nationally representative sample of the Scottish population during 1,767,919 person-seasons of observation. Cases of influenza were confirmed using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a subset of the population (n = 3323). Interventions: Trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccination (n = 274,071). Main outcome measures: VE, pooled across seasons and adjusting for confounders, was estimated by determining laboratory-confirmed influenza, influenza-related morbidity and mortality including primary care influenza-like illnesses, hospitalisation and death from influenza and pneumonia. Results: Most vaccines (93.6%; n = 256,474 vaccines) were administered to at-risk patients targeted for vaccination, with a 69.3% uptake among those aged ≥ 65 years (178,754 vaccinations during 258,100 person-seasons). For at-risk patients aged < 65 years there was a 26.2% uptake (77,264 vaccinations during 295,116 person-seasons). VE in preventing RT-PCR laboratory-confirmed influenza was 57.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31.3% to 73.3%]. VE was 18.8% (95% CI –103.7% to 67.6%) in patients aged ≥ 65 years and 59.6% (95% CI 21.9% to 79.1%) in those aged < 65 years at risk of serious complications from influenza. In the matched analysis (156,096 person-seasons), adjusted VE for reducing primary care consultations for influenza-like illnesses was 16.3% (95% CI 5.7% to 26.0%). VE in reducing hospitalisations was 19.3% for influenza and pneumonia (95% CI 8.3% to 29.1%) and 26.7% for pneumonia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (95% CI 19.8% to 32.9%). VE in reducing death due to influenza and pneumonia was 37.9% (95% CI 29.5% to 45.4%). Conclusions: Few countries' health systems allow for the integrated and accessible data recording that made this study possible and made it feasible to collate centrally almost all hospitalisations and deaths attributed to influenza, thereby allowing completeness of reporting. Using these data, we found most influenza vaccines were administered to those at risk of serious complications from influenza. In a nationally representative cohort we found that the vaccine was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of RT-PCR-confirmed influenza (the decrease was substantial particularly for at-risk patients aged < 65 years) and complications arising from influenza (where more modest decreases were found). Although the modest size of our cohort made it possible to collate centrally almost all cases of influenza-related disease, analysis of subgroups (in particular older age groups) or by individual season resulted in poorer precision and wide CIs. Any future work should therefore aim to address this issue by ensuring adequate power to test VE in these subgroups of patients, while minimising the effect of bias, such as health-seeking behaviour. Funding: The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr01100