The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancer
Abstract Background Pulmonary imaging often identifies suspicious abnormalities resulting in supplementary diagnostic procedures. This study aims to investigate whether the metabolic fingerprint of plasma allows to discriminate between patients with lung inflammation and patients with lung cancer. M...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Cancer |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4755-1 |
id |
doaj-bfd473377c734051a8557448d793c767 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bfd473377c734051a8557448d793c7672020-11-25T01:54:29ZengBMCBMC Cancer1471-24072018-09-0118111210.1186/s12885-018-4755-1The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancerK. Vanhove0P. Giesen1O. E. Owokotomo2L. Mesotten3E. Louis4Z. Shkedy5M. Thomeer6P. Adriaensens7Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt UniversityInstitute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt UniversityInstitute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt UniversityFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt UniversityDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospital LeuvenInstitute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt UniversityFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt UniversityApplied and Analytical Chemistry, Institute for Materials Research, Hasselt UniversityAbstract Background Pulmonary imaging often identifies suspicious abnormalities resulting in supplementary diagnostic procedures. This study aims to investigate whether the metabolic fingerprint of plasma allows to discriminate between patients with lung inflammation and patients with lung cancer. Methods Metabolic profiles of plasma from 347 controls, 269 cancer patients and 108 patients with inflammation were obtained by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Models to discriminate between groups were trained by PLS-LDA. A test set was used for independent validation. A ROC curve was built to evaluate the diagnostic performance of potential biomarkers. Results Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of PET-CT to diagnose cancer are 96, 23, 76 and 71%. Metabolic profiles differentiate between cancer and inflammation with a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 87% and a MCE of 12%. Removal of the glutamate metabolite results in an increase of MCE (38%) and a decrease of both sensitivity and specificity (62%), demonstrating the importance of glutamate for discrimination. At the cut-off point 0.31 on the ROC curve, the relative glutamate concentration discriminates between cancer and inflammation with a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 81%, and an AUC of 0.88. PPV and NPV are 92 and 69%. In PET-positive patients with a relative glutamate level ≤ 0.31 the sensitivity to diagnose cancer reaches 100% with a PPV of 94%. In PET-negative patients, a relative glutamate level > 0.31 increases the specificity of PET from 23% to 58% and results in a high NPV of 100%. In case of discrepancy between SUVmax and the glutamate concentration, lung cancer is missed in 19% of the cases. Conclusion This study indicates that the 1H-NMR-derived relative plasma concentration of glutamate allows discrimination between lung cancer and lung inflammation. A glutamate level ≤ 0.31 in PET-positive patients corresponds to the diagnosis of lung cancer with a higher specificity and PPV than PET-CT. Glutamate levels > 0.31 in patients with PET negative lung lesions is likely to correspond with inflammation. Caution is needed for patients with conflicting SUVmax values and glutamate concentrations. Confirmation is needed in a prospective study with external validation and by another analytical technique such as HPLC-MS.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4755-1Lung cancerLung inflammation1H-NMRMetabolic phenotypeGlutamateROC |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
K. Vanhove P. Giesen O. E. Owokotomo L. Mesotten E. Louis Z. Shkedy M. Thomeer P. Adriaensens |
spellingShingle |
K. Vanhove P. Giesen O. E. Owokotomo L. Mesotten E. Louis Z. Shkedy M. Thomeer P. Adriaensens The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancer BMC Cancer Lung cancer Lung inflammation 1H-NMR Metabolic phenotype Glutamate ROC |
author_facet |
K. Vanhove P. Giesen O. E. Owokotomo L. Mesotten E. Louis Z. Shkedy M. Thomeer P. Adriaensens |
author_sort |
K. Vanhove |
title |
The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancer |
title_short |
The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancer |
title_full |
The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancer |
title_fullStr |
The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
The plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign PET-positive lung lesions from lung cancer |
title_sort |
plasma glutamate concentration as a complementary tool to differentiate benign pet-positive lung lesions from lung cancer |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Cancer |
issn |
1471-2407 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Pulmonary imaging often identifies suspicious abnormalities resulting in supplementary diagnostic procedures. This study aims to investigate whether the metabolic fingerprint of plasma allows to discriminate between patients with lung inflammation and patients with lung cancer. Methods Metabolic profiles of plasma from 347 controls, 269 cancer patients and 108 patients with inflammation were obtained by 1H-NMR spectroscopy. Models to discriminate between groups were trained by PLS-LDA. A test set was used for independent validation. A ROC curve was built to evaluate the diagnostic performance of potential biomarkers. Results Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of PET-CT to diagnose cancer are 96, 23, 76 and 71%. Metabolic profiles differentiate between cancer and inflammation with a sensitivity of 89%, a specificity of 87% and a MCE of 12%. Removal of the glutamate metabolite results in an increase of MCE (38%) and a decrease of both sensitivity and specificity (62%), demonstrating the importance of glutamate for discrimination. At the cut-off point 0.31 on the ROC curve, the relative glutamate concentration discriminates between cancer and inflammation with a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 81%, and an AUC of 0.88. PPV and NPV are 92 and 69%. In PET-positive patients with a relative glutamate level ≤ 0.31 the sensitivity to diagnose cancer reaches 100% with a PPV of 94%. In PET-negative patients, a relative glutamate level > 0.31 increases the specificity of PET from 23% to 58% and results in a high NPV of 100%. In case of discrepancy between SUVmax and the glutamate concentration, lung cancer is missed in 19% of the cases. Conclusion This study indicates that the 1H-NMR-derived relative plasma concentration of glutamate allows discrimination between lung cancer and lung inflammation. A glutamate level ≤ 0.31 in PET-positive patients corresponds to the diagnosis of lung cancer with a higher specificity and PPV than PET-CT. Glutamate levels > 0.31 in patients with PET negative lung lesions is likely to correspond with inflammation. Caution is needed for patients with conflicting SUVmax values and glutamate concentrations. Confirmation is needed in a prospective study with external validation and by another analytical technique such as HPLC-MS. |
topic |
Lung cancer Lung inflammation 1H-NMR Metabolic phenotype Glutamate ROC |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12885-018-4755-1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kvanhove theplasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT pgiesen theplasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT oeowokotomo theplasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT lmesotten theplasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT elouis theplasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT zshkedy theplasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT mthomeer theplasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT padriaensens theplasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT kvanhove plasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT pgiesen plasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT oeowokotomo plasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT lmesotten plasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT elouis plasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT zshkedy plasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT mthomeer plasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer AT padriaensens plasmaglutamateconcentrationasacomplementarytooltodifferentiatebenignpetpositivelunglesionsfromlungcancer |
_version_ |
1724987074375843840 |