The Fall and Rise of the Global Climate Model

Abstract Global models are an essential tool for climate projections, but conventional coarse‐resolution atmospheric general circulation models suffer from errors both in their parameterized cloud physics and in their representation of climatically important circulation features. A notable recent st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johannes Mülmenstädt, Laura J. Wilcox
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2021-09-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002781
id doaj-bfb74b6863a94f06befefec672f9fadd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bfb74b6863a94f06befefec672f9fadd2021-09-28T06:35:40ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662021-09-01139n/an/a10.1029/2021MS002781The Fall and Rise of the Global Climate ModelJohannes Mülmenstädt0Laura J. Wilcox1Atmospheric Sciences & Global Change Division Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland WA USANational Centre for Atmospheric Science University of Reading Reading UKAbstract Global models are an essential tool for climate projections, but conventional coarse‐resolution atmospheric general circulation models suffer from errors both in their parameterized cloud physics and in their representation of climatically important circulation features. A notable recent study by Terai et al. (2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ms002274) documents a global model capable of reproducing the regime‐based effect of aerosols on cloud liquid water path expected from observational evidence. This may represent a significant advance in cloud process fidelity in global models. Such models can be expected to give a better estimate of the effective radiative forcing of the climate. If this advance in cloud process representation can be matched by advances in the representation of circulation features such as monsoons, then such models may also be able to navigate the complex tangle between spatially heterogeneous aerosol–cloud interactions and regional circulation patterns. This tight link between aerosol and circulation results in anthropogenic perturbations of climate variables of societal importance, such as regional rainfall distributions. Upcoming global models with km‐scale resolution may improve the regional circulation and be able to take advantage of the Terai et al. (2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ms002274) improvement in cloud physics. If so, an era of significantly improved regional climate projection capabilities may soon dawn. If not, then the improvement in cloud physics might spur intensified efforts on problems in model dynamics. Either way, based on the rapid changes in aerosol emissions in the near future, learning to make reliable projections based on biased models is a skill that will not go out of style.https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002781aerosol‐cloud interactionsglobal modelingregional climate change
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Johannes Mülmenstädt
Laura J. Wilcox
spellingShingle Johannes Mülmenstädt
Laura J. Wilcox
The Fall and Rise of the Global Climate Model
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
aerosol‐cloud interactions
global modeling
regional climate change
author_facet Johannes Mülmenstädt
Laura J. Wilcox
author_sort Johannes Mülmenstädt
title The Fall and Rise of the Global Climate Model
title_short The Fall and Rise of the Global Climate Model
title_full The Fall and Rise of the Global Climate Model
title_fullStr The Fall and Rise of the Global Climate Model
title_full_unstemmed The Fall and Rise of the Global Climate Model
title_sort fall and rise of the global climate model
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
issn 1942-2466
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Global models are an essential tool for climate projections, but conventional coarse‐resolution atmospheric general circulation models suffer from errors both in their parameterized cloud physics and in their representation of climatically important circulation features. A notable recent study by Terai et al. (2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ms002274) documents a global model capable of reproducing the regime‐based effect of aerosols on cloud liquid water path expected from observational evidence. This may represent a significant advance in cloud process fidelity in global models. Such models can be expected to give a better estimate of the effective radiative forcing of the climate. If this advance in cloud process representation can be matched by advances in the representation of circulation features such as monsoons, then such models may also be able to navigate the complex tangle between spatially heterogeneous aerosol–cloud interactions and regional circulation patterns. This tight link between aerosol and circulation results in anthropogenic perturbations of climate variables of societal importance, such as regional rainfall distributions. Upcoming global models with km‐scale resolution may improve the regional circulation and be able to take advantage of the Terai et al. (2020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ms002274) improvement in cloud physics. If so, an era of significantly improved regional climate projection capabilities may soon dawn. If not, then the improvement in cloud physics might spur intensified efforts on problems in model dynamics. Either way, based on the rapid changes in aerosol emissions in the near future, learning to make reliable projections based on biased models is a skill that will not go out of style.
topic aerosol‐cloud interactions
global modeling
regional climate change
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002781
work_keys_str_mv AT johannesmulmenstadt thefallandriseoftheglobalclimatemodel
AT laurajwilcox thefallandriseoftheglobalclimatemodel
AT johannesmulmenstadt fallandriseoftheglobalclimatemodel
AT laurajwilcox fallandriseoftheglobalclimatemodel
_version_ 1716866430655266816