The Assistive Device Situation for ALS Patients in Norway

Aims. There are limited analytical descriptions of the assistive device situation in Norway for patients with ALS and other motor neuron diseases. This study is aimed at investigating how patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals (occupational therapists and physiotherapists) experience the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jenny Pernilla Rolland, Mari-Anne Myrberget, Tore Wergeland Meisingset
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2021-01-01
Series:Occupational Therapy International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5563343
id doaj-bf9b0f665dc44c5cab2c96494e57928f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf9b0f665dc44c5cab2c96494e57928f2021-08-30T00:00:04ZengHindawi-WileyOccupational Therapy International1557-07032021-01-01202110.1155/2021/5563343The Assistive Device Situation for ALS Patients in NorwayJenny Pernilla Rolland0Mari-Anne Myrberget1Tore Wergeland Meisingset2Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Clinical ServicesInstitute of Neuromedicine and Movement ScienceAims. There are limited analytical descriptions of the assistive device situation in Norway for patients with ALS and other motor neuron diseases. This study is aimed at investigating how patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals (occupational therapists and physiotherapists) experience the assistive device situation. Methods. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with patients with motor neuron disease, caregivers, and healthcare professionals involved in procurement and adaptation of assistive devices. Systematic text condensation was used to analyse the interviews. Results. The majority of patients and caregivers had positive experiences of follow-up by the specialist healthcare service. Several found follow-up by the primary health service to be deficient owing to inadequate expertise, continuity, and resources. Healthcare professionals reported having a proactive approach to identifying needs for assistive devices, but for various reasons, application processes were often delayed. Several patients indicated a reluctance to use assistive devices and were ambivalent regarding proactivity. The availability of assistive devices for some functional impairments was described as inadequate. Some patients felt there was too little focus on sexuality in the follow-up. The respondents had a number of suggestions for improving the assistive device situation. Conclusions. Multidisciplinary ALS teams are found to ensure follow-up expertise and continuity. Healthcare professionals wish to take a proactive approach to assistive devices, but a number of bureaucratic obstacles occur. The study findings are preliminary and should be validated through a prospective national quality registry for motor neuron diseases.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5563343
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jenny Pernilla Rolland
Mari-Anne Myrberget
Tore Wergeland Meisingset
spellingShingle Jenny Pernilla Rolland
Mari-Anne Myrberget
Tore Wergeland Meisingset
The Assistive Device Situation for ALS Patients in Norway
Occupational Therapy International
author_facet Jenny Pernilla Rolland
Mari-Anne Myrberget
Tore Wergeland Meisingset
author_sort Jenny Pernilla Rolland
title The Assistive Device Situation for ALS Patients in Norway
title_short The Assistive Device Situation for ALS Patients in Norway
title_full The Assistive Device Situation for ALS Patients in Norway
title_fullStr The Assistive Device Situation for ALS Patients in Norway
title_full_unstemmed The Assistive Device Situation for ALS Patients in Norway
title_sort assistive device situation for als patients in norway
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Occupational Therapy International
issn 1557-0703
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Aims. There are limited analytical descriptions of the assistive device situation in Norway for patients with ALS and other motor neuron diseases. This study is aimed at investigating how patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals (occupational therapists and physiotherapists) experience the assistive device situation. Methods. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with patients with motor neuron disease, caregivers, and healthcare professionals involved in procurement and adaptation of assistive devices. Systematic text condensation was used to analyse the interviews. Results. The majority of patients and caregivers had positive experiences of follow-up by the specialist healthcare service. Several found follow-up by the primary health service to be deficient owing to inadequate expertise, continuity, and resources. Healthcare professionals reported having a proactive approach to identifying needs for assistive devices, but for various reasons, application processes were often delayed. Several patients indicated a reluctance to use assistive devices and were ambivalent regarding proactivity. The availability of assistive devices for some functional impairments was described as inadequate. Some patients felt there was too little focus on sexuality in the follow-up. The respondents had a number of suggestions for improving the assistive device situation. Conclusions. Multidisciplinary ALS teams are found to ensure follow-up expertise and continuity. Healthcare professionals wish to take a proactive approach to assistive devices, but a number of bureaucratic obstacles occur. The study findings are preliminary and should be validated through a prospective national quality registry for motor neuron diseases.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5563343
work_keys_str_mv AT jennypernillarolland theassistivedevicesituationforalspatientsinnorway
AT mariannemyrberget theassistivedevicesituationforalspatientsinnorway
AT torewergelandmeisingset theassistivedevicesituationforalspatientsinnorway
AT jennypernillarolland assistivedevicesituationforalspatientsinnorway
AT mariannemyrberget assistivedevicesituationforalspatientsinnorway
AT torewergelandmeisingset assistivedevicesituationforalspatientsinnorway
_version_ 1721186250743873536