The Right Of The Child To Care And Constitutional Damages For The Loss Of Parental Care: Some Thoughts On M V Minister Of Police And Minister Of Police V Mboweni

In the a quo judgment in M v Minister of Police a radical new approach was followed in respect of claims for loss of parental care. The issue before court was whether a child whose parent has died as a result of the wrongful conduct of the South African Police Services may sue for damages arising fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JA Robinson, R Prinsloo
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2015-12-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/p-per/issuepages/2015volume18no5/2015%2818%295RobinsonPrinsloo.pdf
id doaj-bf85f2ec82ea468f9d27a08081869e65
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf85f2ec82ea468f9d27a08081869e652020-11-25T01:19:33ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812015-12-0118516691690http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i5.14 The Right Of The Child To Care And Constitutional Damages For The Loss Of Parental Care: Some Thoughts On M V Minister Of Police And Minister Of Police V MboweniJA Robinson0R Prinsloo1North-West University (Potchefstroom)Vaal University of Technology In the a quo judgment in M v Minister of Police a radical new approach was followed in respect of claims for loss of parental care. The issue before court was whether a child whose parent has died as a result of the wrongful conduct of the South African Police Services may sue for damages arising from the child's constitutional right to parental care in terms of section 28(1)(b). The question which the Court had to answer was whether a claim for damages may be instituted on the grounds that children are as a result of the wrongful death of their father deprived of their constitutionally entrenched right to parental care. This contribution reflects on the reasoning of the different courts and the relevance of same for the debate regarding the care of children in terms of section 28(1)(b) of the Constitution and section 1 of the Children's Act 38 of 2005. http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/p-per/issuepages/2015volume18no5/2015%2818%295RobinsonPrinsloo.pdfparental careChildren's Act 38 of 2005constitutional damagesappropriate relief
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author JA Robinson
R Prinsloo
spellingShingle JA Robinson
R Prinsloo
The Right Of The Child To Care And Constitutional Damages For The Loss Of Parental Care: Some Thoughts On M V Minister Of Police And Minister Of Police V Mboweni
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
parental care
Children's Act 38 of 2005
constitutional damages
appropriate relief
author_facet JA Robinson
R Prinsloo
author_sort JA Robinson
title The Right Of The Child To Care And Constitutional Damages For The Loss Of Parental Care: Some Thoughts On M V Minister Of Police And Minister Of Police V Mboweni
title_short The Right Of The Child To Care And Constitutional Damages For The Loss Of Parental Care: Some Thoughts On M V Minister Of Police And Minister Of Police V Mboweni
title_full The Right Of The Child To Care And Constitutional Damages For The Loss Of Parental Care: Some Thoughts On M V Minister Of Police And Minister Of Police V Mboweni
title_fullStr The Right Of The Child To Care And Constitutional Damages For The Loss Of Parental Care: Some Thoughts On M V Minister Of Police And Minister Of Police V Mboweni
title_full_unstemmed The Right Of The Child To Care And Constitutional Damages For The Loss Of Parental Care: Some Thoughts On M V Minister Of Police And Minister Of Police V Mboweni
title_sort right of the child to care and constitutional damages for the loss of parental care: some thoughts on m v minister of police and minister of police v mboweni
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2015-12-01
description In the a quo judgment in M v Minister of Police a radical new approach was followed in respect of claims for loss of parental care. The issue before court was whether a child whose parent has died as a result of the wrongful conduct of the South African Police Services may sue for damages arising from the child's constitutional right to parental care in terms of section 28(1)(b). The question which the Court had to answer was whether a claim for damages may be instituted on the grounds that children are as a result of the wrongful death of their father deprived of their constitutionally entrenched right to parental care. This contribution reflects on the reasoning of the different courts and the relevance of same for the debate regarding the care of children in terms of section 28(1)(b) of the Constitution and section 1 of the Children's Act 38 of 2005.
topic parental care
Children's Act 38 of 2005
constitutional damages
appropriate relief
url http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/p-per/issuepages/2015volume18no5/2015%2818%295RobinsonPrinsloo.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jarobinson therightofthechildtocareandconstitutionaldamagesforthelossofparentalcaresomethoughtsonmvministerofpoliceandministerofpolicevmboweni
AT rprinsloo therightofthechildtocareandconstitutionaldamagesforthelossofparentalcaresomethoughtsonmvministerofpoliceandministerofpolicevmboweni
AT jarobinson rightofthechildtocareandconstitutionaldamagesforthelossofparentalcaresomethoughtsonmvministerofpoliceandministerofpolicevmboweni
AT rprinsloo rightofthechildtocareandconstitutionaldamagesforthelossofparentalcaresomethoughtsonmvministerofpoliceandministerofpolicevmboweni
_version_ 1725137697963507712