Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Surfaces for a Collaborative Design Task

We investigate the use of different surface orientations for collaborative design tasks. Specifically, we compare horizontal and vertical surface orientations used by dyads performing a collaborative design task while standing. We investigate how the display orientation influences group participati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brianna Potvin, Colin Swindells, Melanie Tory, Margaret-Anne Storey
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/137686
id doaj-bf859abc35544a59849e578fd1f6c266
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf859abc35544a59849e578fd1f6c2662020-11-24T23:04:19ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Human-Computer Interaction1687-58931687-59072012-01-01201210.1155/2012/137686137686Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Surfaces for a Collaborative Design TaskBrianna Potvin0Colin Swindells1Melanie Tory2Margaret-Anne Storey3Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Engineering/Computer Science Building (ECS), Room 504, P.O. Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, CanadaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Engineering/Computer Science Building (ECS), Room 504, P.O. Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, CanadaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Engineering/Computer Science Building (ECS), Room 504, P.O. Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, CanadaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Engineering/Computer Science Building (ECS), Room 504, P.O. Box 3055, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 3P6, CanadaWe investigate the use of different surface orientations for collaborative design tasks. Specifically, we compare horizontal and vertical surface orientations used by dyads performing a collaborative design task while standing. We investigate how the display orientation influences group participation including face-to-face contact, total discussion, and equality of physical and verbal participation among participants. Our results suggest that vertical displays better support face-to-face contact whereas side-by-side arrangements encourage more discussion. However, display orientation has little impact on equality of verbal and physical participation, and users do not consistently prefer one orientation over the other. Based on our findings, we suggest that further investigation into the differences between horizontal and vertical orientations is warranted.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/137686
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brianna Potvin
Colin Swindells
Melanie Tory
Margaret-Anne Storey
spellingShingle Brianna Potvin
Colin Swindells
Melanie Tory
Margaret-Anne Storey
Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Surfaces for a Collaborative Design Task
Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
author_facet Brianna Potvin
Colin Swindells
Melanie Tory
Margaret-Anne Storey
author_sort Brianna Potvin
title Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Surfaces for a Collaborative Design Task
title_short Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Surfaces for a Collaborative Design Task
title_full Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Surfaces for a Collaborative Design Task
title_fullStr Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Surfaces for a Collaborative Design Task
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Horizontal and Vertical Surfaces for a Collaborative Design Task
title_sort comparing horizontal and vertical surfaces for a collaborative design task
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
issn 1687-5893
1687-5907
publishDate 2012-01-01
description We investigate the use of different surface orientations for collaborative design tasks. Specifically, we compare horizontal and vertical surface orientations used by dyads performing a collaborative design task while standing. We investigate how the display orientation influences group participation including face-to-face contact, total discussion, and equality of physical and verbal participation among participants. Our results suggest that vertical displays better support face-to-face contact whereas side-by-side arrangements encourage more discussion. However, display orientation has little impact on equality of verbal and physical participation, and users do not consistently prefer one orientation over the other. Based on our findings, we suggest that further investigation into the differences between horizontal and vertical orientations is warranted.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/137686
work_keys_str_mv AT briannapotvin comparinghorizontalandverticalsurfacesforacollaborativedesigntask
AT colinswindells comparinghorizontalandverticalsurfacesforacollaborativedesigntask
AT melanietory comparinghorizontalandverticalsurfacesforacollaborativedesigntask
AT margaretannestorey comparinghorizontalandverticalsurfacesforacollaborativedesigntask
_version_ 1725631280159129600