Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the body fluid closest to the pathology of multiple sclerosis (MS). For many candidate biomarkers CSF is the only fluid that can be investigated. Several factors need to be standardized when sampling CSF for biomarker research: time/volume of CSF collection, sample proce...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2006-01-01
|
Series: | Disease Markers |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/509476 |
id |
doaj-bf6aa46f913c4cbd91375d5322a8f4a6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf6aa46f913c4cbd91375d5322a8f4a62020-11-25T01:00:27ZengHindawi LimitedDisease Markers0278-02401875-86302006-01-0122418719610.1155/2006/509476Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid BiomarkersGavin Giovannoni0Department of Neuroinflammation, Institute of Neurology, University College London, Queen Square, London, UKCerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the body fluid closest to the pathology of multiple sclerosis (MS). For many candidate biomarkers CSF is the only fluid that can be investigated. Several factors need to be standardized when sampling CSF for biomarker research: time/volume of CSF collection, sample processing/storage, and the temporal relationship of sampling to clinical or MRI markers of disease activity. Assays used for biomarker detection must be validated so as to optimize the power of the studies. A formal method for establishing whether or not a particular biomarker can be used as a surrogate end-point needs to be adopted. This process is similar to that used in clinical trials, where the reporting of studies has to be done in a standardized way with sufficient detail to permit a critical review of the study and to enable others to reproduce the study design. A commitment must be made to report negative studies so as to prevent publication bias. Pre-defined consensus criteria need to be developed for MS-related prognostic biomarkers. Currently no candidate biomarker is suitable as a surrogate end-point. Bulk biomarkers of the neurodegenerative process such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilaments (NF) have advantages over intermittent inflammatory markers.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/509476 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gavin Giovannoni |
spellingShingle |
Gavin Giovannoni Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers Disease Markers |
author_facet |
Gavin Giovannoni |
author_sort |
Gavin Giovannoni |
title |
Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers |
title_short |
Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers |
title_full |
Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers |
title_fullStr |
Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multiple Sclerosis Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers |
title_sort |
multiple sclerosis cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Disease Markers |
issn |
0278-0240 1875-8630 |
publishDate |
2006-01-01 |
description |
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the body fluid closest to the pathology of multiple sclerosis (MS). For many candidate biomarkers CSF is the only fluid that can be investigated. Several factors need to be standardized when sampling CSF for biomarker research: time/volume of CSF collection, sample processing/storage, and the temporal relationship of sampling to clinical or MRI markers of disease activity. Assays used for biomarker detection must be validated so as to optimize the power of the studies. A formal method for establishing whether or not a particular biomarker can be used as a surrogate end-point needs to be adopted. This process is similar to that used in clinical trials, where the reporting of studies has to be done in a standardized way with sufficient detail to permit a critical review of the study and to enable others to reproduce the study design. A commitment must be made to report negative studies so as to prevent publication bias. Pre-defined consensus criteria need to be developed for MS-related prognostic biomarkers. Currently no candidate biomarker is suitable as a surrogate end-point. Bulk biomarkers of the neurodegenerative process such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilaments (NF) have advantages over intermittent inflammatory markers. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2006/509476 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gavingiovannoni multiplesclerosiscerebrospinalfluidbiomarkers |
_version_ |
1725213302382919680 |