Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication

Abstract Background The benefit and the risk profile of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for intracerebral cavernoma remains incompletely defined in part due to the natural history of low incidence of bleeding and spontaneous regression of this vascular malformation. In this study, we retrieved cases...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiung-Chyi Shen, Ming Hsi Sun, Meng-Yin Yang, Weir-Chiang You, Meei-Ling Sheu, Yen-Ju Chen, Ying Ju Chen, Jason Sheehan, Hung-Chuan Pan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-08-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01885-4
id doaj-bf684202451641a083891e4f5c87f0c5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf684202451641a083891e4f5c87f0c52021-08-29T11:18:30ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2021-08-0116111010.1186/s13014-021-01885-4Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indicationChiung-Chyi Shen0Ming Hsi Sun1Meng-Yin Yang2Weir-Chiang You3Meei-Ling Sheu4Yen-Ju Chen5Ying Ju Chen6Jason Sheehan7Hung-Chuan Pan8Department of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General HospitalInstitute of Biomedical Science, National Chung-Hsin UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalCollege of Humanities and Social Sciences, Providence UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of VirginiaDepartment of Medical Research and Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalAbstract Background The benefit and the risk profile of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for intracerebral cavernoma remains incompletely defined in part due to the natural history of low incidence of bleeding and spontaneous regression of this vascular malformation. In this study, we retrieved cases from a prospectively collected database to assess the outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated with GKRS using a double blinded review process for treatment. Methods From 2003 to 2018, there were 94 cases of cavernoma treated by GKRS in the doubly blinded assessments by two experienced neurological and approved for GKRS treatment. All the patients received GKRS with margin dose of 11–12 (Gray) Gy and afterwards were assessed for neurological outcome, radiologic response, and quality of life. Results The median age of the patients was 48 (15–85) years with median follow up of 77 (26–180) months post SRS. The mean target volume was 1.93 ± 3.45 cc. In those who has pre-SRS epilepsy, 7 of 16 (43.7%) achieved seizure freedom (Engel I/II) and 9 of 16 (56.3%) achieved decreased seizures (Engel III) after SRS. Rebleeding occurred in 2 cases (2.1%) at 13 and 52 months post SRS. The radiologic assessment demonstrated 20 (21.3%) cases of decreased cavernoma volume, 69 (73.4%) were stable, and 5 (7.3%) increased size. Eighty-seven of 94 (92.5%) cases at the last follow up achieve improvement in their quality of life, but 7 cases (7.4%) showed a deterioration. In statistical analysis, the effective seizure control class (Engel I/II) was highly correlated with patient harboring a single lesion (p < 0.05) and deep seated location of the cavernoma (p < 0.01). New neurological deficits were highly correlated with decreased mental (p < 0.001) and physical (p < 0.05) components of quality of life testing, KPS (p < 0.001), deep seated location (p < 0.01), and increased nidus volume (p < 0.05). Quality of life deterioration either in physical component (p < 0.01), mental component (p < 0.01), and KPS (p < 0.05) was highly correlated with increased cavernoma volume. Conclusion Low margin dose GKRS for intracerebral cavernoma offers reasonable seizure control and improved quality of life while conferring a low risk of treatment complications including adverse radiation effect.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01885-4
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chiung-Chyi Shen
Ming Hsi Sun
Meng-Yin Yang
Weir-Chiang You
Meei-Ling Sheu
Yen-Ju Chen
Ying Ju Chen
Jason Sheehan
Hung-Chuan Pan
spellingShingle Chiung-Chyi Shen
Ming Hsi Sun
Meng-Yin Yang
Weir-Chiang You
Meei-Ling Sheu
Yen-Ju Chen
Ying Ju Chen
Jason Sheehan
Hung-Chuan Pan
Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication
Radiation Oncology
author_facet Chiung-Chyi Shen
Ming Hsi Sun
Meng-Yin Yang
Weir-Chiang You
Meei-Ling Sheu
Yen-Ju Chen
Ying Ju Chen
Jason Sheehan
Hung-Chuan Pan
author_sort Chiung-Chyi Shen
title Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication
title_short Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication
title_full Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication
title_fullStr Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication
title_full_unstemmed Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication
title_sort outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by gamma knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Background The benefit and the risk profile of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for intracerebral cavernoma remains incompletely defined in part due to the natural history of low incidence of bleeding and spontaneous regression of this vascular malformation. In this study, we retrieved cases from a prospectively collected database to assess the outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated with GKRS using a double blinded review process for treatment. Methods From 2003 to 2018, there were 94 cases of cavernoma treated by GKRS in the doubly blinded assessments by two experienced neurological and approved for GKRS treatment. All the patients received GKRS with margin dose of 11–12 (Gray) Gy and afterwards were assessed for neurological outcome, radiologic response, and quality of life. Results The median age of the patients was 48 (15–85) years with median follow up of 77 (26–180) months post SRS. The mean target volume was 1.93 ± 3.45 cc. In those who has pre-SRS epilepsy, 7 of 16 (43.7%) achieved seizure freedom (Engel I/II) and 9 of 16 (56.3%) achieved decreased seizures (Engel III) after SRS. Rebleeding occurred in 2 cases (2.1%) at 13 and 52 months post SRS. The radiologic assessment demonstrated 20 (21.3%) cases of decreased cavernoma volume, 69 (73.4%) were stable, and 5 (7.3%) increased size. Eighty-seven of 94 (92.5%) cases at the last follow up achieve improvement in their quality of life, but 7 cases (7.4%) showed a deterioration. In statistical analysis, the effective seizure control class (Engel I/II) was highly correlated with patient harboring a single lesion (p < 0.05) and deep seated location of the cavernoma (p < 0.01). New neurological deficits were highly correlated with decreased mental (p < 0.001) and physical (p < 0.05) components of quality of life testing, KPS (p < 0.001), deep seated location (p < 0.01), and increased nidus volume (p < 0.05). Quality of life deterioration either in physical component (p < 0.01), mental component (p < 0.01), and KPS (p < 0.05) was highly correlated with increased cavernoma volume. Conclusion Low margin dose GKRS for intracerebral cavernoma offers reasonable seizure control and improved quality of life while conferring a low risk of treatment complications including adverse radiation effect.
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01885-4
work_keys_str_mv AT chiungchyishen outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
AT minghsisun outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
AT mengyinyang outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
AT weirchiangyou outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
AT meeilingsheu outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
AT yenjuchen outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
AT yingjuchen outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
AT jasonsheehan outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
AT hungchuanpan outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication
_version_ 1721186968336859136