Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication
Abstract Background The benefit and the risk profile of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for intracerebral cavernoma remains incompletely defined in part due to the natural history of low incidence of bleeding and spontaneous regression of this vascular malformation. In this study, we retrieved cases...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Radiation Oncology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01885-4 |
id |
doaj-bf684202451641a083891e4f5c87f0c5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf684202451641a083891e4f5c87f0c52021-08-29T11:18:30ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2021-08-0116111010.1186/s13014-021-01885-4Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indicationChiung-Chyi Shen0Ming Hsi Sun1Meng-Yin Yang2Weir-Chiang You3Meei-Ling Sheu4Yen-Ju Chen5Ying Ju Chen6Jason Sheehan7Hung-Chuan Pan8Department of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General HospitalInstitute of Biomedical Science, National Chung-Hsin UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalCollege of Humanities and Social Sciences, Providence UniversityDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of VirginiaDepartment of Medical Research and Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General HospitalAbstract Background The benefit and the risk profile of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for intracerebral cavernoma remains incompletely defined in part due to the natural history of low incidence of bleeding and spontaneous regression of this vascular malformation. In this study, we retrieved cases from a prospectively collected database to assess the outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated with GKRS using a double blinded review process for treatment. Methods From 2003 to 2018, there were 94 cases of cavernoma treated by GKRS in the doubly blinded assessments by two experienced neurological and approved for GKRS treatment. All the patients received GKRS with margin dose of 11–12 (Gray) Gy and afterwards were assessed for neurological outcome, radiologic response, and quality of life. Results The median age of the patients was 48 (15–85) years with median follow up of 77 (26–180) months post SRS. The mean target volume was 1.93 ± 3.45 cc. In those who has pre-SRS epilepsy, 7 of 16 (43.7%) achieved seizure freedom (Engel I/II) and 9 of 16 (56.3%) achieved decreased seizures (Engel III) after SRS. Rebleeding occurred in 2 cases (2.1%) at 13 and 52 months post SRS. The radiologic assessment demonstrated 20 (21.3%) cases of decreased cavernoma volume, 69 (73.4%) were stable, and 5 (7.3%) increased size. Eighty-seven of 94 (92.5%) cases at the last follow up achieve improvement in their quality of life, but 7 cases (7.4%) showed a deterioration. In statistical analysis, the effective seizure control class (Engel I/II) was highly correlated with patient harboring a single lesion (p < 0.05) and deep seated location of the cavernoma (p < 0.01). New neurological deficits were highly correlated with decreased mental (p < 0.001) and physical (p < 0.05) components of quality of life testing, KPS (p < 0.001), deep seated location (p < 0.01), and increased nidus volume (p < 0.05). Quality of life deterioration either in physical component (p < 0.01), mental component (p < 0.01), and KPS (p < 0.05) was highly correlated with increased cavernoma volume. Conclusion Low margin dose GKRS for intracerebral cavernoma offers reasonable seizure control and improved quality of life while conferring a low risk of treatment complications including adverse radiation effect.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01885-4 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chiung-Chyi Shen Ming Hsi Sun Meng-Yin Yang Weir-Chiang You Meei-Ling Sheu Yen-Ju Chen Ying Ju Chen Jason Sheehan Hung-Chuan Pan |
spellingShingle |
Chiung-Chyi Shen Ming Hsi Sun Meng-Yin Yang Weir-Chiang You Meei-Ling Sheu Yen-Ju Chen Ying Ju Chen Jason Sheehan Hung-Chuan Pan Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication Radiation Oncology |
author_facet |
Chiung-Chyi Shen Ming Hsi Sun Meng-Yin Yang Weir-Chiang You Meei-Ling Sheu Yen-Ju Chen Ying Ju Chen Jason Sheehan Hung-Chuan Pan |
author_sort |
Chiung-Chyi Shen |
title |
Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication |
title_short |
Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication |
title_full |
Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication |
title_fullStr |
Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication |
title_full_unstemmed |
Outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by Gamma Knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication |
title_sort |
outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated by gamma knife radiosurgery based on a double-blind assessment of treatment indication |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Radiation Oncology |
issn |
1748-717X |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The benefit and the risk profile of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for intracerebral cavernoma remains incompletely defined in part due to the natural history of low incidence of bleeding and spontaneous regression of this vascular malformation. In this study, we retrieved cases from a prospectively collected database to assess the outcome of intracerebral cavernoma treated with GKRS using a double blinded review process for treatment. Methods From 2003 to 2018, there were 94 cases of cavernoma treated by GKRS in the doubly blinded assessments by two experienced neurological and approved for GKRS treatment. All the patients received GKRS with margin dose of 11–12 (Gray) Gy and afterwards were assessed for neurological outcome, radiologic response, and quality of life. Results The median age of the patients was 48 (15–85) years with median follow up of 77 (26–180) months post SRS. The mean target volume was 1.93 ± 3.45 cc. In those who has pre-SRS epilepsy, 7 of 16 (43.7%) achieved seizure freedom (Engel I/II) and 9 of 16 (56.3%) achieved decreased seizures (Engel III) after SRS. Rebleeding occurred in 2 cases (2.1%) at 13 and 52 months post SRS. The radiologic assessment demonstrated 20 (21.3%) cases of decreased cavernoma volume, 69 (73.4%) were stable, and 5 (7.3%) increased size. Eighty-seven of 94 (92.5%) cases at the last follow up achieve improvement in their quality of life, but 7 cases (7.4%) showed a deterioration. In statistical analysis, the effective seizure control class (Engel I/II) was highly correlated with patient harboring a single lesion (p < 0.05) and deep seated location of the cavernoma (p < 0.01). New neurological deficits were highly correlated with decreased mental (p < 0.001) and physical (p < 0.05) components of quality of life testing, KPS (p < 0.001), deep seated location (p < 0.01), and increased nidus volume (p < 0.05). Quality of life deterioration either in physical component (p < 0.01), mental component (p < 0.01), and KPS (p < 0.05) was highly correlated with increased cavernoma volume. Conclusion Low margin dose GKRS for intracerebral cavernoma offers reasonable seizure control and improved quality of life while conferring a low risk of treatment complications including adverse radiation effect. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-021-01885-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chiungchyishen outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication AT minghsisun outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication AT mengyinyang outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication AT weirchiangyou outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication AT meeilingsheu outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication AT yenjuchen outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication AT yingjuchen outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication AT jasonsheehan outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication AT hungchuanpan outcomeofintracerebralcavernomatreatedbygammakniferadiosurgerybasedonadoubleblindassessmentoftreatmentindication |
_version_ |
1721186968336859136 |