One Philosophical Dialogue: (Mutual) Understanding and the Art of Reticence
The idea of philosophical dialogue centers on the idea of a thought-out conversation between interlocutors who are interested in clarifying the concepts and foundations of knowledge. In M. Heidegger’s A Dialogue on Language: Between a Japanese and an Inquirer participants are supposed to avoid ready...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
2016-12-01
|
Series: | RUDN Journal of Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11773 |
id |
doaj-bf5b578b7a1d4f2d8147865e948463c1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf5b578b7a1d4f2d8147865e948463c12020-11-25T00:25:24ZdeuPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Philosophy2313-23022408-89002016-12-0102849411772One Philosophical Dialogue: (Mutual) Understanding and the Art of ReticenceS V Rudanovskaya0Российский университет дружбы народовThe idea of philosophical dialogue centers on the idea of a thought-out conversation between interlocutors who are interested in clarifying the concepts and foundations of knowledge. In M. Heidegger’s A Dialogue on Language: Between a Japanese and an Inquirer participants are supposed to avoid ready-made definitions of culture while approaching the original wonder of thought in its contact with an indeterminate world. This experience is revealed and interpreted during the dialogue in connection with the Japanese art of reticence. The article deals with the concept of dialogue as a non-classical conversation with its refraining from accepted procedures of knowledge production, attention to language, returning to the origins of philosophical inquiring. Emphasis is made on a process of understanding as «paving a path»; that is deliberate, keen to signs, differences, unpredictable in its discoveries and far from being finished.http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11773неопределенностьпереводпониманиепуть мыслиразличиясуществованиефилософский диалогХайдеггер Мязык диалогаяпонское искусство |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S V Rudanovskaya |
spellingShingle |
S V Rudanovskaya One Philosophical Dialogue: (Mutual) Understanding and the Art of Reticence RUDN Journal of Philosophy неопределенность перевод понимание путь мысли различия существование философский диалог Хайдеггер М язык диалога японское искусство |
author_facet |
S V Rudanovskaya |
author_sort |
S V Rudanovskaya |
title |
One Philosophical Dialogue: (Mutual) Understanding and the Art of Reticence |
title_short |
One Philosophical Dialogue: (Mutual) Understanding and the Art of Reticence |
title_full |
One Philosophical Dialogue: (Mutual) Understanding and the Art of Reticence |
title_fullStr |
One Philosophical Dialogue: (Mutual) Understanding and the Art of Reticence |
title_full_unstemmed |
One Philosophical Dialogue: (Mutual) Understanding and the Art of Reticence |
title_sort |
one philosophical dialogue: (mutual) understanding and the art of reticence |
publisher |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
series |
RUDN Journal of Philosophy |
issn |
2313-2302 2408-8900 |
publishDate |
2016-12-01 |
description |
The idea of philosophical dialogue centers on the idea of a thought-out conversation between interlocutors who are interested in clarifying the concepts and foundations of knowledge. In M. Heidegger’s A Dialogue on Language: Between a Japanese and an Inquirer participants are supposed to avoid ready-made definitions of culture while approaching the original wonder of thought in its contact with an indeterminate world. This experience is revealed and interpreted during the dialogue in connection with the Japanese art of reticence. The article deals with the concept of dialogue as a non-classical conversation with its refraining from accepted procedures of knowledge production, attention to language, returning to the origins of philosophical inquiring. Emphasis is made on a process of understanding as «paving a path»; that is deliberate, keen to signs, differences, unpredictable in its discoveries and far from being finished. |
topic |
неопределенность перевод понимание путь мысли различия существование философский диалог Хайдеггер М язык диалога японское искусство |
url |
http://journals.rudn.ru/philosophy/article/view/11773 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT svrudanovskaya onephilosophicaldialoguemutualunderstandingandtheartofreticence |
_version_ |
1725349202814304256 |