A Nature Deity? The Ṛgvedic Savitṛ Revisited
The problematic identity of the deity Savitṛ in early Vedic religion has sparked more than a century of discussion. Harry Falk, for instance, argued that this god, whose name literally means “Impeller”, can be identified with the Milky Way and associated with the rainy season. Others have suggested...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Finnish Oriental Society
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Studia Orientalia Electronica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.fi/store/article/view/89288 |
id |
doaj-bf5ab33997834f1b84ee292b0222363a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf5ab33997834f1b84ee292b0222363a2020-11-25T04:03:26ZengFinnish Oriental SocietyStudia Orientalia Electronica2323-52092020-10-0181153174https://doi.org/10.23993/store.89288A Nature Deity? The Ṛgvedic Savitṛ RevisitedDominik A. Haas0University of ViennaThe problematic identity of the deity Savitṛ in early Vedic religion has sparked more than a century of discussion. Harry Falk, for instance, argued that this god, whose name literally means “Impeller”, can be identified with the Milky Way and associated with the rainy season. Others have suggested that he becomes visible in the zodiacal light or crepuscular rays. The aims of this paper are to review the most important theories about Savitṛ’s manifestations in nature in Ṛgvedic times and to reassess whether and in what ways different natural phenomena and celestial luminaries may have been associated with this deity. In discussing the theories proposed so far, I not only consider the Vedic sources but re-evaluate the archaeoastronomical arguments with modern software. As it turns out, there is no conclusive evidence that Savitṛ was associated with any single phenomenon or luminary at all. Rather, he was an anthropomorphic deification of what was perceived as a certain “cosmic” or “natural” force.https://journal.fi/store/article/view/89288ancient culturesvedic religionsavitṛarchaeoastronomymilky wayzodiacal lightcrepuscular rays |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dominik A. Haas |
spellingShingle |
Dominik A. Haas A Nature Deity? The Ṛgvedic Savitṛ Revisited Studia Orientalia Electronica ancient cultures vedic religion savitṛ archaeoastronomy milky way zodiacal light crepuscular rays |
author_facet |
Dominik A. Haas |
author_sort |
Dominik A. Haas |
title |
A Nature Deity? The Ṛgvedic Savitṛ Revisited |
title_short |
A Nature Deity? The Ṛgvedic Savitṛ Revisited |
title_full |
A Nature Deity? The Ṛgvedic Savitṛ Revisited |
title_fullStr |
A Nature Deity? The Ṛgvedic Savitṛ Revisited |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Nature Deity? The Ṛgvedic Savitṛ Revisited |
title_sort |
nature deity? the ṛgvedic savitṛ revisited |
publisher |
Finnish Oriental Society |
series |
Studia Orientalia Electronica |
issn |
2323-5209 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
The problematic identity of the deity Savitṛ in early Vedic religion has sparked more than a century of discussion. Harry Falk, for instance, argued that this god, whose name literally means “Impeller”, can be identified with the Milky Way and associated with the rainy season. Others have suggested that he becomes visible in the zodiacal light or crepuscular rays. The aims of this paper are to review the most important theories about Savitṛ’s manifestations in nature in Ṛgvedic times and to reassess whether and in what ways different natural phenomena and celestial luminaries may have been associated with this deity. In discussing the theories proposed so far, I not only consider the Vedic sources but re-evaluate the archaeoastronomical arguments with modern software. As it turns out, there is no conclusive evidence that Savitṛ was associated with any single phenomenon or luminary at all. Rather, he was an anthropomorphic deification of what was perceived as a certain “cosmic” or “natural” force. |
topic |
ancient cultures vedic religion savitṛ archaeoastronomy milky way zodiacal light crepuscular rays |
url |
https://journal.fi/store/article/view/89288 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dominikahaas anaturedeitythergvedicsavitrrevisited AT dominikahaas naturedeitythergvedicsavitrrevisited |
_version_ |
1724440130485223424 |