Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol
The chemical composition, in vitro genotoxicity, and cytotoxicity of the mainstream aerosol from the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS2.2) were compared with those of the mainstream smoke from the 3R4F reference cigarette. In contrast to the 3R4F, the tobacco plug in the THS2.2 is not burnt. The low o...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Amaltea Medical Publishing House
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Romanian Medical Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://revistemedicale.amaltea.ro/Romanian_MEDICAL_Journal/Revista_MEDICALA_ROMANA-2018-Nr.4/RMJ_2018_4_Art-16.pdf
|
id |
doaj-bf50851626a94b46922b5ba57ff23067 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf50851626a94b46922b5ba57ff230672021-09-02T17:28:38ZengAmaltea Medical Publishing HouseRomanian Medical Journal1220-54782069-606X2018-12-01654Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosolJean-Pierre SchallerDaniela KellerLaurent PogetPascal PratteEtienne KaelinDamian McHughGianluca CudazzoDaniel SmartAnthony R. TrickerLydia GautierMichel YerlyRoger Reis PiresSoazig Le BouhellecDavid GhoshIris HoferEva GarciaPatrick VanscheeuwijckSerge MaederThe chemical composition, in vitro genotoxicity, and cytotoxicity of the mainstream aerosol from the Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS2.2) were compared with those of the mainstream smoke from the 3R4F reference cigarette. In contrast to the 3R4F, the tobacco plug in the THS2.2 is not burnt. The low operating temperature of THS2.2 caused distinct shifts in the aerosol composition compared with 3R4F. This resulted in a reduction of more than 90% for the majority of the analyzed harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs), while the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol remained similar. A reduction of about 90% was also observed when comparing the cytotoxicity determined by the neutral red uptake assay and the mutagenic potency in the mouse lymphoma assay. The THS2.2 aerosol was not mutagenic in the Ames assay. The chemical composition of the THS2.2 aerosol was also evaluated under extreme climatic and puffing conditions. When generating the THS2.2 aerosol under “desert” or “tropical” conditions, the generation of HPHCs was not significantly modified. When using puffing regimens that were more intense than the standard Health Canada Intense (HCI) machinesmoking conditions, the HPHC yields remained lower than when smoking the 3R4F reference cigarette with the HCI regimen. https://revistemedicale.amaltea.ro/Romanian_MEDICAL_Journal/Revista_MEDICALA_ROMANA-2018-Nr.4/RMJ_2018_4_Art-16.pdf Tobacco heating systemHeat-not-burnModified risk tobacco productHarmful and potentially harmfulconstituentsHPHCAerosol chemistryMutagenicityCytotoxicity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jean-Pierre Schaller Daniela Keller Laurent Poget Pascal Pratte Etienne Kaelin Damian McHugh Gianluca Cudazzo Daniel Smart Anthony R. Tricker Lydia Gautier Michel Yerly Roger Reis Pires Soazig Le Bouhellec David Ghosh Iris Hofer Eva Garcia Patrick Vanscheeuwijck Serge Maeder |
spellingShingle |
Jean-Pierre Schaller Daniela Keller Laurent Poget Pascal Pratte Etienne Kaelin Damian McHugh Gianluca Cudazzo Daniel Smart Anthony R. Tricker Lydia Gautier Michel Yerly Roger Reis Pires Soazig Le Bouhellec David Ghosh Iris Hofer Eva Garcia Patrick Vanscheeuwijck Serge Maeder Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol Romanian Medical Journal Tobacco heating system Heat-not-burn Modified risk tobacco product Harmful and potentially harmful constituents HPHC Aerosol chemistry Mutagenicity Cytotoxicity |
author_facet |
Jean-Pierre Schaller Daniela Keller Laurent Poget Pascal Pratte Etienne Kaelin Damian McHugh Gianluca Cudazzo Daniel Smart Anthony R. Tricker Lydia Gautier Michel Yerly Roger Reis Pires Soazig Le Bouhellec David Ghosh Iris Hofer Eva Garcia Patrick Vanscheeuwijck Serge Maeder |
author_sort |
Jean-Pierre Schaller |
title |
Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol |
title_short |
Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol |
title_full |
Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 2: Chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol |
title_sort |
evaluation of the tobacco heating system 2.2. part 2: chemical composition, genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and physical properties of the aerosol |
publisher |
Amaltea Medical Publishing House |
series |
Romanian Medical Journal |
issn |
1220-5478 2069-606X |
publishDate |
2018-12-01 |
description |
The chemical composition, in vitro genotoxicity, and cytotoxicity of the mainstream aerosol from the
Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS2.2) were compared with those of the mainstream smoke from the 3R4F
reference cigarette. In contrast to the 3R4F, the tobacco plug in the THS2.2 is not burnt. The low operating
temperature of THS2.2 caused distinct shifts in the aerosol composition compared with 3R4F. This
resulted in a reduction of more than 90% for the majority of the analyzed harmful and potentially
harmful constituents (HPHCs), while the mass median aerodynamic diameter of the aerosol remained
similar. A reduction of about 90% was also observed when comparing the cytotoxicity determined by the
neutral red uptake assay and the mutagenic potency in the mouse lymphoma assay. The THS2.2 aerosol
was not mutagenic in the Ames assay. The chemical composition of the THS2.2 aerosol was also evaluated under extreme climatic and puffing conditions. When generating the THS2.2 aerosol under
“desert” or “tropical” conditions, the generation of HPHCs was not significantly modified. When using
puffing regimens that were more intense than the standard Health Canada Intense (HCI) machinesmoking conditions, the HPHC yields remained lower than when smoking the 3R4F reference cigarette
with the HCI regimen. |
topic |
Tobacco heating system Heat-not-burn Modified risk tobacco product Harmful and potentially harmful constituents HPHC Aerosol chemistry Mutagenicity Cytotoxicity |
url |
https://revistemedicale.amaltea.ro/Romanian_MEDICAL_Journal/Revista_MEDICALA_ROMANA-2018-Nr.4/RMJ_2018_4_Art-16.pdf
|
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeanpierreschaller evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT danielakeller evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT laurentpoget evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT pascalpratte evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT etiennekaelin evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT damianmchugh evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT gianlucacudazzo evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT danielsmart evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT anthonyrtricker evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT lydiagautier evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT michelyerly evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT rogerreispires evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT soaziglebouhellec evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT davidghosh evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT irishofer evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT evagarcia evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT patrickvanscheeuwijck evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol AT sergemaeder evaluationofthetobaccoheatingsystem22part2chemicalcompositiongenotoxicitycytotoxicityandphysicalpropertiesoftheaerosol |
_version_ |
1721172232230666240 |