Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures

Abstract Our ability to evaluate outcomes which genuinely reflect patients’ unmet needs, hopes and concerns is of pivotal importance. However, much current clinical research and practice falls short of this objective by selecting outcome measures which do not capture patient value to the fullest. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Morel, Stefan J. Cano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-11-01
Series:Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13023-017-0718-x
id doaj-bf4e2c37c31d424bb3803862bb6a5c7e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf4e2c37c31d424bb3803862bb6a5c7e2020-11-25T02:17:56ZengBMCOrphanet Journal of Rare Diseases1750-11722017-11-0112111310.1186/s13023-017-0718-xMeasuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measuresThomas Morel0Stefan J. Cano1KU LeuvenModus OutcomesAbstract Our ability to evaluate outcomes which genuinely reflect patients’ unmet needs, hopes and concerns is of pivotal importance. However, much current clinical research and practice falls short of this objective by selecting outcome measures which do not capture patient value to the fullest. In this Opinion, we discuss Patient-Centered Outcomes Measures (PCOMs), which have the potential to systematically incorporate patient perspectives to measure those outcomes that matter most to patients. We argue for greater multi-stakeholder collaboration to develop PCOMs, with rare disease patients and families at the center. Beyond advancing the science of patient input, PCOMs are powerful tools to translate care or observed treatment benefit into an ‘interpretable’ measure of patient benefit, and thereby help demonstrate clinical effectiveness. We propose mixed methods psychometric research as the best route to deliver fit-for-purpose PCOMs in rare diseases, as this methodology brings together qualitative and quantitative research methods in tandem with the explicit aim to efficiently utilise data from small samples. And, whether one opts to develop a brand-new PCOM or to select or adapt an existing outcome measure for use in a rare disease, the anchors remain the same: patients, their daily experience of the rare disease, their preferences, core concepts and values. Ultimately, existing value frameworks, registries, and outcomes-based contracts largely fall short of consistently measuring the full range of outcomes that matter to patients. We argue that greater use of PCOMs in rare diseases would enable a fast track to Patient-Centered Care.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13023-017-0718-xPatient-centered outcome measuresRare diseasesPatient-focused drug development (PFDD)Clinical outcome assessmentsPatient-reported outcomesPatient-relevant outcomes
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Morel
Stefan J. Cano
spellingShingle Thomas Morel
Stefan J. Cano
Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Patient-centered outcome measures
Rare diseases
Patient-focused drug development (PFDD)
Clinical outcome assessments
Patient-reported outcomes
Patient-relevant outcomes
author_facet Thomas Morel
Stefan J. Cano
author_sort Thomas Morel
title Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures
title_short Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures
title_full Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures
title_fullStr Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures
title_full_unstemmed Measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the IRDiRC taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures
title_sort measuring what matters to rare disease patients – reflections on the work by the irdirc taskforce on patient-centered outcome measures
publisher BMC
series Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
issn 1750-1172
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Abstract Our ability to evaluate outcomes which genuinely reflect patients’ unmet needs, hopes and concerns is of pivotal importance. However, much current clinical research and practice falls short of this objective by selecting outcome measures which do not capture patient value to the fullest. In this Opinion, we discuss Patient-Centered Outcomes Measures (PCOMs), which have the potential to systematically incorporate patient perspectives to measure those outcomes that matter most to patients. We argue for greater multi-stakeholder collaboration to develop PCOMs, with rare disease patients and families at the center. Beyond advancing the science of patient input, PCOMs are powerful tools to translate care or observed treatment benefit into an ‘interpretable’ measure of patient benefit, and thereby help demonstrate clinical effectiveness. We propose mixed methods psychometric research as the best route to deliver fit-for-purpose PCOMs in rare diseases, as this methodology brings together qualitative and quantitative research methods in tandem with the explicit aim to efficiently utilise data from small samples. And, whether one opts to develop a brand-new PCOM or to select or adapt an existing outcome measure for use in a rare disease, the anchors remain the same: patients, their daily experience of the rare disease, their preferences, core concepts and values. Ultimately, existing value frameworks, registries, and outcomes-based contracts largely fall short of consistently measuring the full range of outcomes that matter to patients. We argue that greater use of PCOMs in rare diseases would enable a fast track to Patient-Centered Care.
topic Patient-centered outcome measures
Rare diseases
Patient-focused drug development (PFDD)
Clinical outcome assessments
Patient-reported outcomes
Patient-relevant outcomes
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13023-017-0718-x
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasmorel measuringwhatmatterstorarediseasepatientsreflectionsontheworkbytheirdirctaskforceonpatientcenteredoutcomemeasures
AT stefanjcano measuringwhatmatterstorarediseasepatientsreflectionsontheworkbytheirdirctaskforceonpatientcenteredoutcomemeasures
_version_ 1724884083683622912