PENENTUAN BOBOT KEPENTINGAN DECISION MAKER DALAM GROUP DECISION MAKING

Generally, there are two criteria which are widely used to determineDM’s weight of interest, i.e. competenceand consensus. Various studies related to determine DM’s weight of interest based on competence or consensusseparately have been conducted. Each criterion has its own advantages. The advantage...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dian Eko Hari Purnomo dan Nur Aini Masruroh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Gadjah Mada 2015-11-01
Series:Jurnal Teknosains: Jurnal Ilmiah Sains dan Teknologi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/teknosains/article/view/7965
id doaj-bf4421e13cfc47a2bf202a117dcdd424
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf4421e13cfc47a2bf202a117dcdd4242020-11-25T00:44:15ZengUniversitas Gadjah MadaJurnal Teknosains: Jurnal Ilmiah Sains dan Teknologi2089-61312443-13112015-11-014210.22146/teknosains.79656637PENENTUAN BOBOT KEPENTINGAN DECISION MAKER DALAM GROUP DECISION MAKINGDian Eko Hari Purnomo dan Nur Aini Masruroh0Pascasarjana Teknik Industri Universitas Gadjah MadaGenerally, there are two criteria which are widely used to determineDM’s weight of interest, i.e. competenceand consensus. Various studies related to determine DM’s weight of interest based on competence or consensusseparately have been conducted. Each criterion has its own advantages. The advantage of using competence as acriterion is DMs who have high competence based on their consistence on the decisions made will have high of interest weight. Meanwhile, consensus criterion emphasizes a DM/s contribution to a group without consideringthe DM’s ability or competence.Considering the advantages of both criteria, this study developed a model to determine DM’s weight of interestby considering the DM’ competence and consensus in a GDM. This study used2 group decision making cases totaling in 6 groups consisting of 5 people each. Collected data was then processedusing DM’s weight of interest determination method based on competence and consensus. A model was thendesigned using regression method and fuzzy method. Therefore, a model to determine DM’s weight of interest was obtained by considering competence and consensus. DM’s weight of interest from each method was then involvedin group decision making. The research result showed that group decisions made by involving DM’s weight of interest were better decisions. It implies competence and consensus are two criteria which can be used to determineDM’s weight of interest.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/teknosains/article/view/7965Group Decision Making (GDM)Decision Maker (DM)DM WeightsCompetenceConsensus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dian Eko Hari Purnomo dan Nur Aini Masruroh
spellingShingle Dian Eko Hari Purnomo dan Nur Aini Masruroh
PENENTUAN BOBOT KEPENTINGAN DECISION MAKER DALAM GROUP DECISION MAKING
Jurnal Teknosains: Jurnal Ilmiah Sains dan Teknologi
Group Decision Making (GDM)
Decision Maker (DM)
DM Weights
Competence
Consensus
author_facet Dian Eko Hari Purnomo dan Nur Aini Masruroh
author_sort Dian Eko Hari Purnomo dan Nur Aini Masruroh
title PENENTUAN BOBOT KEPENTINGAN DECISION MAKER DALAM GROUP DECISION MAKING
title_short PENENTUAN BOBOT KEPENTINGAN DECISION MAKER DALAM GROUP DECISION MAKING
title_full PENENTUAN BOBOT KEPENTINGAN DECISION MAKER DALAM GROUP DECISION MAKING
title_fullStr PENENTUAN BOBOT KEPENTINGAN DECISION MAKER DALAM GROUP DECISION MAKING
title_full_unstemmed PENENTUAN BOBOT KEPENTINGAN DECISION MAKER DALAM GROUP DECISION MAKING
title_sort penentuan bobot kepentingan decision maker dalam group decision making
publisher Universitas Gadjah Mada
series Jurnal Teknosains: Jurnal Ilmiah Sains dan Teknologi
issn 2089-6131
2443-1311
publishDate 2015-11-01
description Generally, there are two criteria which are widely used to determineDM’s weight of interest, i.e. competenceand consensus. Various studies related to determine DM’s weight of interest based on competence or consensusseparately have been conducted. Each criterion has its own advantages. The advantage of using competence as acriterion is DMs who have high competence based on their consistence on the decisions made will have high of interest weight. Meanwhile, consensus criterion emphasizes a DM/s contribution to a group without consideringthe DM’s ability or competence.Considering the advantages of both criteria, this study developed a model to determine DM’s weight of interestby considering the DM’ competence and consensus in a GDM. This study used2 group decision making cases totaling in 6 groups consisting of 5 people each. Collected data was then processedusing DM’s weight of interest determination method based on competence and consensus. A model was thendesigned using regression method and fuzzy method. Therefore, a model to determine DM’s weight of interest was obtained by considering competence and consensus. DM’s weight of interest from each method was then involvedin group decision making. The research result showed that group decisions made by involving DM’s weight of interest were better decisions. It implies competence and consensus are two criteria which can be used to determineDM’s weight of interest.
topic Group Decision Making (GDM)
Decision Maker (DM)
DM Weights
Competence
Consensus
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/teknosains/article/view/7965
work_keys_str_mv AT dianekoharipurnomodannurainimasruroh penentuanbobotkepentingandecisionmakerdalamgroupdecisionmaking
_version_ 1725275454090248192