Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture

Study Design Retrospective comparative study. Purpose This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological data and rate of mechanical complications in elderly patients treated with short segment (SSS) or long segment stabilization (LSS) for thoracolumbar junction osteoporotic vertebral fractures (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Massimo Girardo, Alessandro Massè, Salvatore Risitano, Federico Fusini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spine Society 2021-08-01
Series:Asian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2020-0033.pdf
id doaj-bf3c78b5712e4a0cb167d84ce1620489
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf3c78b5712e4a0cb167d84ce16204892021-08-17T04:44:09ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462021-08-0115442443010.31616/asj.2020.00331274Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral FractureMassimo Girardo0Alessandro Massè1Salvatore Risitano2Federico Fusini3 Spine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Maggiore Hospital of Chieri, Turin, Italy Spine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, ItalyStudy Design Retrospective comparative study. Purpose This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological data and rate of mechanical complications in elderly patients treated with short segment (SSS) or long segment stabilization (LSS) for thoracolumbar junction osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). Overview of Literature A fervent debate is now focused on the treatment of OVF using SSS or LSS. High rate of complications is associated with pedicle screw fixation because of poor bone quality. Methods Patients over 65 years old with a T-score of <−2.5, affected by (T10–L2) vertebral fracture treated with LSS or SSS pedicle screw fixation, with at least 24 months of follow-up were evaluated. All patients were analyzed with conventional X-ray to evaluate bisegmental kyphotic angle (BKA) and clinically with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and rate of mechanical complications at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Student t-test was used to compare clinical scores between populations. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze clinical and radiological variable, whereas Fisher’s exact test was used to identify differences in the rate of complications between groups. Results A total of 37 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 33.97±9.26 months. For both groups, ODI and VAS significantly decreased over time with good results (p<0.00001). At the final follow-up, no significant differences were found in terms of ODI and VAS. There was no difference in correction of BKA between groups; however, a significant difference was found in LSS group between pre- and postoperative BKA (p=0.046), whereas no difference was found in SSS group. A significant difference in the rate of mechanical complications was found between groups (p=0.011). Conclusions Both treatments showed good clinical and radiological results; however, LSS group showed better BKA correction and lower mechanical complications than SSS group.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2020-0033.pdffragility vertebral fracturelong segment fixationshort segment fixationaugmentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Massimo Girardo
Alessandro Massè
Salvatore Risitano
Federico Fusini
spellingShingle Massimo Girardo
Alessandro Massè
Salvatore Risitano
Federico Fusini
Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture
Asian Spine Journal
fragility vertebral fracture
long segment fixation
short segment fixation
augmentation
author_facet Massimo Girardo
Alessandro Massè
Salvatore Risitano
Federico Fusini
author_sort Massimo Girardo
title Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture
title_short Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture
title_full Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture
title_fullStr Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture
title_full_unstemmed Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture
title_sort long versus short segment instrumentation in osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fracture
publisher Korean Spine Society
series Asian Spine Journal
issn 1976-1902
1976-7846
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Study Design Retrospective comparative study. Purpose This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological data and rate of mechanical complications in elderly patients treated with short segment (SSS) or long segment stabilization (LSS) for thoracolumbar junction osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). Overview of Literature A fervent debate is now focused on the treatment of OVF using SSS or LSS. High rate of complications is associated with pedicle screw fixation because of poor bone quality. Methods Patients over 65 years old with a T-score of <−2.5, affected by (T10–L2) vertebral fracture treated with LSS or SSS pedicle screw fixation, with at least 24 months of follow-up were evaluated. All patients were analyzed with conventional X-ray to evaluate bisegmental kyphotic angle (BKA) and clinically with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and rate of mechanical complications at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Student t-test was used to compare clinical scores between populations. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze clinical and radiological variable, whereas Fisher’s exact test was used to identify differences in the rate of complications between groups. Results A total of 37 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 33.97±9.26 months. For both groups, ODI and VAS significantly decreased over time with good results (p<0.00001). At the final follow-up, no significant differences were found in terms of ODI and VAS. There was no difference in correction of BKA between groups; however, a significant difference was found in LSS group between pre- and postoperative BKA (p=0.046), whereas no difference was found in SSS group. A significant difference in the rate of mechanical complications was found between groups (p=0.011). Conclusions Both treatments showed good clinical and radiological results; however, LSS group showed better BKA correction and lower mechanical complications than SSS group.
topic fragility vertebral fracture
long segment fixation
short segment fixation
augmentation
url http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2020-0033.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT massimogirardo longversusshortsegmentinstrumentationinosteoporoticthoracolumbarvertebralfracture
AT alessandromasse longversusshortsegmentinstrumentationinosteoporoticthoracolumbarvertebralfracture
AT salvatorerisitano longversusshortsegmentinstrumentationinosteoporoticthoracolumbarvertebralfracture
AT federicofusini longversusshortsegmentinstrumentationinosteoporoticthoracolumbarvertebralfracture
_version_ 1721205470786486272