Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture
Study Design Retrospective comparative study. Purpose This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological data and rate of mechanical complications in elderly patients treated with short segment (SSS) or long segment stabilization (LSS) for thoracolumbar junction osteoporotic vertebral fractures (...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Spine Society
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Asian Spine Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2020-0033.pdf |
id |
doaj-bf3c78b5712e4a0cb167d84ce1620489 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf3c78b5712e4a0cb167d84ce16204892021-08-17T04:44:09ZengKorean Spine SocietyAsian Spine Journal1976-19021976-78462021-08-0115442443010.31616/asj.2020.00331274Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral FractureMassimo Girardo0Alessandro Massè1Salvatore Risitano2Federico Fusini3 Spine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Turin, Turin, Italy Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Maggiore Hospital of Chieri, Turin, Italy Spine Surgery Unit, Orthopaedic and Trauma Centre, Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, ItalyStudy Design Retrospective comparative study. Purpose This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological data and rate of mechanical complications in elderly patients treated with short segment (SSS) or long segment stabilization (LSS) for thoracolumbar junction osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). Overview of Literature A fervent debate is now focused on the treatment of OVF using SSS or LSS. High rate of complications is associated with pedicle screw fixation because of poor bone quality. Methods Patients over 65 years old with a T-score of <−2.5, affected by (T10–L2) vertebral fracture treated with LSS or SSS pedicle screw fixation, with at least 24 months of follow-up were evaluated. All patients were analyzed with conventional X-ray to evaluate bisegmental kyphotic angle (BKA) and clinically with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and rate of mechanical complications at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Student t-test was used to compare clinical scores between populations. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze clinical and radiological variable, whereas Fisher’s exact test was used to identify differences in the rate of complications between groups. Results A total of 37 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 33.97±9.26 months. For both groups, ODI and VAS significantly decreased over time with good results (p<0.00001). At the final follow-up, no significant differences were found in terms of ODI and VAS. There was no difference in correction of BKA between groups; however, a significant difference was found in LSS group between pre- and postoperative BKA (p=0.046), whereas no difference was found in SSS group. A significant difference in the rate of mechanical complications was found between groups (p=0.011). Conclusions Both treatments showed good clinical and radiological results; however, LSS group showed better BKA correction and lower mechanical complications than SSS group.http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2020-0033.pdffragility vertebral fracturelong segment fixationshort segment fixationaugmentation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Massimo Girardo Alessandro Massè Salvatore Risitano Federico Fusini |
spellingShingle |
Massimo Girardo Alessandro Massè Salvatore Risitano Federico Fusini Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture Asian Spine Journal fragility vertebral fracture long segment fixation short segment fixation augmentation |
author_facet |
Massimo Girardo Alessandro Massè Salvatore Risitano Federico Fusini |
author_sort |
Massimo Girardo |
title |
Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture |
title_short |
Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture |
title_full |
Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture |
title_fullStr |
Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture |
title_full_unstemmed |
Long versus Short Segment Instrumentation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture |
title_sort |
long versus short segment instrumentation in osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fracture |
publisher |
Korean Spine Society |
series |
Asian Spine Journal |
issn |
1976-1902 1976-7846 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
Study Design Retrospective comparative study. Purpose This study aimed to compare clinical and radiological data and rate of mechanical complications in elderly patients treated with short segment (SSS) or long segment stabilization (LSS) for thoracolumbar junction osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). Overview of Literature A fervent debate is now focused on the treatment of OVF using SSS or LSS. High rate of complications is associated with pedicle screw fixation because of poor bone quality. Methods Patients over 65 years old with a T-score of <−2.5, affected by (T10–L2) vertebral fracture treated with LSS or SSS pedicle screw fixation, with at least 24 months of follow-up were evaluated. All patients were analyzed with conventional X-ray to evaluate bisegmental kyphotic angle (BKA) and clinically with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and rate of mechanical complications at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months. Data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. Student t-test was used to compare clinical scores between populations. Mann-Whitney U-test was used to analyze clinical and radiological variable, whereas Fisher’s exact test was used to identify differences in the rate of complications between groups. Results A total of 37 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up was 33.97±9.26 months. For both groups, ODI and VAS significantly decreased over time with good results (p<0.00001). At the final follow-up, no significant differences were found in terms of ODI and VAS. There was no difference in correction of BKA between groups; however, a significant difference was found in LSS group between pre- and postoperative BKA (p=0.046), whereas no difference was found in SSS group. A significant difference in the rate of mechanical complications was found between groups (p=0.011). Conclusions Both treatments showed good clinical and radiological results; however, LSS group showed better BKA correction and lower mechanical complications than SSS group. |
topic |
fragility vertebral fracture long segment fixation short segment fixation augmentation |
url |
http://www.asianspinejournal.org/upload/pdf/asj-2020-0033.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT massimogirardo longversusshortsegmentinstrumentationinosteoporoticthoracolumbarvertebralfracture AT alessandromasse longversusshortsegmentinstrumentationinosteoporoticthoracolumbarvertebralfracture AT salvatorerisitano longversusshortsegmentinstrumentationinosteoporoticthoracolumbarvertebralfracture AT federicofusini longversusshortsegmentinstrumentationinosteoporoticthoracolumbarvertebralfracture |
_version_ |
1721205470786486272 |