La Tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ?
In order to reconsider the prejudice of the servility which allegedly characterized the relation of ancient rhetoricians towards their “classics”, we examine in this paper the evolution of the use of models from Isocrates’ pedagogy to Hermogenes’ ideai. One thing appe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Presses universitaires de Caen
2012-12-01
|
Series: | Kentron |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/kentron/1140 |
id |
doaj-bf380c24d88f43c3b1f400e4e9ab7f94 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf380c24d88f43c3b1f400e4e9ab7f942020-11-25T01:40:28ZfraPresses universitaires de CaenKentron0765-05902264-14592012-12-012811113010.4000/kentron.1140La Tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ?Pierre ChironIn order to reconsider the prejudice of the servility which allegedly characterized the relation of ancient rhetoricians towards their “classics”, we examine in this paper the evolution of the use of models from Isocrates’ pedagogy to Hermogenes’ ideai. One thing appears distinctly: after a period when imitation is personal (the pupil imitates the master), this use is progressively mediated by more and more sophisticated formal categories which introduce minute technical parameters and allow a personal reorganisation and –thus– a free appropriation of stylistic devices.http://journals.openedition.org/kentron/1140Aelius TheonAristotleHermogenesimitationIsocratesstylistic form |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fra |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Pierre Chiron |
spellingShingle |
Pierre Chiron La Tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ? Kentron Aelius Theon Aristotle Hermogenes imitation Isocrates stylistic form |
author_facet |
Pierre Chiron |
author_sort |
Pierre Chiron |
title |
La Tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ? |
title_short |
La Tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ? |
title_full |
La Tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ? |
title_fullStr |
La Tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ? |
title_full_unstemmed |
La Tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ? |
title_sort |
la tradition chez les rhéteurs : emprunt ou empreinte ? |
publisher |
Presses universitaires de Caen |
series |
Kentron |
issn |
0765-0590 2264-1459 |
publishDate |
2012-12-01 |
description |
In order to reconsider the prejudice of the servility which allegedly characterized the relation of ancient rhetoricians towards their “classics”, we examine in this paper the evolution of the use of models from Isocrates’ pedagogy to Hermogenes’ ideai. One thing appears distinctly: after a period when imitation is personal (the pupil imitates the master), this use is progressively mediated by more and more sophisticated formal categories which introduce minute technical parameters and allow a personal reorganisation and –thus– a free appropriation of stylistic devices. |
topic |
Aelius Theon Aristotle Hermogenes imitation Isocrates stylistic form |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/kentron/1140 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pierrechiron latraditionchezlesrheteursempruntouempreinte |
_version_ |
1725045496545804288 |