Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance

This article addresses teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance using quantitative data from the OECD TALIS 2018 and qualitative data from a study on teacher autonomy conducted in Norway and Brazil. In this article, teacher autonomy is seen as a multidimensional concept referri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-08-01
Series:Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1965372
id doaj-bf28a0bc2bbb47cab4c8119e57c1928b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf28a0bc2bbb47cab4c8119e57c1928b2021-08-24T15:34:21ZengTaylor & Francis GroupNordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy2002-03172021-08-010011610.1080/20020317.2021.19653721965372Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governanceAna Lucia Lennert da Silva0Inland Norway University of Applied SciencesThis article addresses teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance using quantitative data from the OECD TALIS 2018 and qualitative data from a study on teacher autonomy conducted in Norway and Brazil. In this article, teacher autonomy is seen as a multidimensional concept referring to decision-making and control in relation to state governance. Further, the different degrees of implementation of accountability measures across countries determine the models of educational governance. The quantitative data reveals no clear pattern between teacher autonomy and models of educational governance. In general, teachers perceive that they have good control over teaching and planning at the classroom level. However, teachers report that they participate to a lesser degree in professional collaboration in schools, which could allow for collegial teacher autonomy. Teachers also report low perceived social value and policy influence, which may provide insight into professional teacher autonomy at the policy level. This article also shows the relevance of a detailed description of the country cases to gain a better understanding of the multiple dimensions of teacher autonomy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1965372comparative educationteacher autonomyeducational governancetalis 2018
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva
spellingShingle Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva
Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance
Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
comparative education
teacher autonomy
educational governance
talis 2018
author_facet Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva
author_sort Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva
title Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance
title_short Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance
title_full Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance
title_fullStr Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance
title_full_unstemmed Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance
title_sort comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy
issn 2002-0317
publishDate 2021-08-01
description This article addresses teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance using quantitative data from the OECD TALIS 2018 and qualitative data from a study on teacher autonomy conducted in Norway and Brazil. In this article, teacher autonomy is seen as a multidimensional concept referring to decision-making and control in relation to state governance. Further, the different degrees of implementation of accountability measures across countries determine the models of educational governance. The quantitative data reveals no clear pattern between teacher autonomy and models of educational governance. In general, teachers perceive that they have good control over teaching and planning at the classroom level. However, teachers report that they participate to a lesser degree in professional collaboration in schools, which could allow for collegial teacher autonomy. Teachers also report low perceived social value and policy influence, which may provide insight into professional teacher autonomy at the policy level. This article also shows the relevance of a detailed description of the country cases to gain a better understanding of the multiple dimensions of teacher autonomy.
topic comparative education
teacher autonomy
educational governance
talis 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1965372
work_keys_str_mv AT analucialennertdasilva comparingteacherautonomyindifferentmodelsofeducationalgovernance
_version_ 1721197407446761472