Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance
This article addresses teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance using quantitative data from the OECD TALIS 2018 and qualitative data from a study on teacher autonomy conducted in Norway and Brazil. In this article, teacher autonomy is seen as a multidimensional concept referri...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1965372 |
id |
doaj-bf28a0bc2bbb47cab4c8119e57c1928b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bf28a0bc2bbb47cab4c8119e57c1928b2021-08-24T15:34:21ZengTaylor & Francis GroupNordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy2002-03172021-08-010011610.1080/20020317.2021.19653721965372Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governanceAna Lucia Lennert da Silva0Inland Norway University of Applied SciencesThis article addresses teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance using quantitative data from the OECD TALIS 2018 and qualitative data from a study on teacher autonomy conducted in Norway and Brazil. In this article, teacher autonomy is seen as a multidimensional concept referring to decision-making and control in relation to state governance. Further, the different degrees of implementation of accountability measures across countries determine the models of educational governance. The quantitative data reveals no clear pattern between teacher autonomy and models of educational governance. In general, teachers perceive that they have good control over teaching and planning at the classroom level. However, teachers report that they participate to a lesser degree in professional collaboration in schools, which could allow for collegial teacher autonomy. Teachers also report low perceived social value and policy influence, which may provide insight into professional teacher autonomy at the policy level. This article also shows the relevance of a detailed description of the country cases to gain a better understanding of the multiple dimensions of teacher autonomy.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1965372comparative educationteacher autonomyeducational governancetalis 2018 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva |
spellingShingle |
Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy comparative education teacher autonomy educational governance talis 2018 |
author_facet |
Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva |
author_sort |
Ana Lucia Lennert da Silva |
title |
Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance |
title_short |
Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance |
title_full |
Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance |
title_fullStr |
Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance |
title_sort |
comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy |
issn |
2002-0317 |
publishDate |
2021-08-01 |
description |
This article addresses teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance using quantitative data from the OECD TALIS 2018 and qualitative data from a study on teacher autonomy conducted in Norway and Brazil. In this article, teacher autonomy is seen as a multidimensional concept referring to decision-making and control in relation to state governance. Further, the different degrees of implementation of accountability measures across countries determine the models of educational governance. The quantitative data reveals no clear pattern between teacher autonomy and models of educational governance. In general, teachers perceive that they have good control over teaching and planning at the classroom level. However, teachers report that they participate to a lesser degree in professional collaboration in schools, which could allow for collegial teacher autonomy. Teachers also report low perceived social value and policy influence, which may provide insight into professional teacher autonomy at the policy level. This article also shows the relevance of a detailed description of the country cases to gain a better understanding of the multiple dimensions of teacher autonomy. |
topic |
comparative education teacher autonomy educational governance talis 2018 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2021.1965372 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT analucialennertdasilva comparingteacherautonomyindifferentmodelsofeducationalgovernance |
_version_ |
1721197407446761472 |