A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models

It is possible that model selection has been the most researched and most discussed topic in the history of both statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM). The reason for this is because selecting one model for interpretive use from amongst many possible models is both essential and difficul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James Grace
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2020-03-01
Series:One Ecosystem
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50452/download/pdf/
id doaj-bee7ba5500974849926695a8eb267b10
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bee7ba5500974849926695a8eb267b102020-11-25T02:39:26ZengPensoft PublishersOne Ecosystem2367-81942020-03-01513110.3897/oneeco.5.e5045250452A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation modelsJames Grace0U.S. Geological SurveyIt is possible that model selection has been the most researched and most discussed topic in the history of both statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM). The reason for this is because selecting one model for interpretive use from amongst many possible models is both essential and difficult. The published protocols and advice for model evaluation and selection in SEM studies are complex and difficult to integrate with current approaches used in biology. Opposition to the use of p-values and decision thresholds has been voiced by the statistics community, yet certain phases of model evaluation have been historically tied to reliance on p-values. In this paper, I outline an approach to model evaluation, comparison and selection based on a weight-of-evidence paradigm. The details and proposed sequence of steps are illustrated using a real-world example. At the end of the paper, I briefly discuss the current state of knowledge and a possible direction for future studies.https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50452/download/pdf/structural equation modellingpath modelsmodel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Grace
spellingShingle James Grace
A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models
One Ecosystem
structural equation modelling
path models
model
author_facet James Grace
author_sort James Grace
title A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models
title_short A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models
title_full A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models
title_fullStr A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models
title_full_unstemmed A 'Weight of Evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models
title_sort 'weight of evidence' approach to evaluating structural equation models
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series One Ecosystem
issn 2367-8194
publishDate 2020-03-01
description It is possible that model selection has been the most researched and most discussed topic in the history of both statistics and structural equation modeling (SEM). The reason for this is because selecting one model for interpretive use from amongst many possible models is both essential and difficult. The published protocols and advice for model evaluation and selection in SEM studies are complex and difficult to integrate with current approaches used in biology. Opposition to the use of p-values and decision thresholds has been voiced by the statistics community, yet certain phases of model evaluation have been historically tied to reliance on p-values. In this paper, I outline an approach to model evaluation, comparison and selection based on a weight-of-evidence paradigm. The details and proposed sequence of steps are illustrated using a real-world example. At the end of the paper, I briefly discuss the current state of knowledge and a possible direction for future studies.
topic structural equation modelling
path models
model
url https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/50452/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesgrace aweightofevidenceapproachtoevaluatingstructuralequationmodels
AT jamesgrace weightofevidenceapproachtoevaluatingstructuralequationmodels
_version_ 1724786096369303552