Cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort study

Abstract Background Low back pain (LBP) imposes a costly burden upon patients, healthcare insurers, and society overall. Spinal manipulation as practiced by chiropractors has been found be cost-effective for treatment of LBP, but there is wide variation among chiropractors in their approach to clini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James M. Whedon, Serena Bezdjian, Patricia Dennis, Vivi-Ann Fischer, Robb Russell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-12-01
Series:Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-00356-z
id doaj-bede91c800934112ba3c824dff22afdb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bede91c800934112ba3c824dff22afdb2020-12-20T12:42:08ZengBMCChiropractic & Manual Therapies2045-709X2020-12-012811710.1186/s12998-020-00356-zCost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort studyJames M. Whedon0Serena Bezdjian1Patricia Dennis2Vivi-Ann Fischer3Robb Russell4Southern California University of Health SciencesSouthern California University of Health SciencesFulcrum Health, IncFulcrum Health, IncSouthern California University of Health SciencesAbstract Background Low back pain (LBP) imposes a costly burden upon patients, healthcare insurers, and society overall. Spinal manipulation as practiced by chiropractors has been found be cost-effective for treatment of LBP, but there is wide variation among chiropractors in their approach to clinical care, and the most cost-effective approach to chiropractic care is uncertain. To date, little has been published regarding the cost effectiveness of different approaches to chiropractic care. Thus, the current study presents a cost comparison between chiropractic approaches for patients with acute or subacute care episodes for low back pain. Methods We employed a retrospective cohort design to examine costs of chiropractic care among patients diagnosed with acute or subacute low back pain. The study time period ranged between 07/01/2016 and 12/22/2017. We compared cost outcomes for patients of two cohorts of chiropractors within health care system: Cohort 1) a general network of providers, and Cohort 2) a network providing conservative evidence-based care for rapid resolution of pain. We used generalized linear regression modeling to estimate the comparative influence of demographic and clinical factors on expenditures. Results A total of 25,621 unique patients were included in the analyses. The average cost per patient for Cohort 2 (mean allowed amount $252) was lower compared to Cohort 1 (mean allowed amount $326; 0.77, 95% CI 0.75–0.79, p < .001). Patient and clinician related factors such as health plan, provider region, and sex also significantly influenced costs. Conclusions This study comprehensively analyzed cost data associated with the chiropractic care of adults with acute or sub-acute low back pain cared by two cohorts of chiropractic physicians. In general, providers in Cohort 2 were found to be significantly associated with lower costs for patient care as compared to Cohort 1. Utilization of a clinical model characterized by a patient-centered clinic approach and standardized, best-practice clinical protocols may offer lower cost when compared to non-standardized clinical approaches to chiropractic care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-00356-zAcute or subacute low back painChiropractic careCost comparisonPatient care
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James M. Whedon
Serena Bezdjian
Patricia Dennis
Vivi-Ann Fischer
Robb Russell
spellingShingle James M. Whedon
Serena Bezdjian
Patricia Dennis
Vivi-Ann Fischer
Robb Russell
Cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort study
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Acute or subacute low back pain
Chiropractic care
Cost comparison
Patient care
author_facet James M. Whedon
Serena Bezdjian
Patricia Dennis
Vivi-Ann Fischer
Robb Russell
author_sort James M. Whedon
title Cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort study
title_short Cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort study
title_full Cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort study
title_fullStr Cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low Back pain care episodes: a cohort study
title_sort cost comparison of two approaches to chiropractic care for patients with acute and sub-acute low back pain care episodes: a cohort study
publisher BMC
series Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
issn 2045-709X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Abstract Background Low back pain (LBP) imposes a costly burden upon patients, healthcare insurers, and society overall. Spinal manipulation as practiced by chiropractors has been found be cost-effective for treatment of LBP, but there is wide variation among chiropractors in their approach to clinical care, and the most cost-effective approach to chiropractic care is uncertain. To date, little has been published regarding the cost effectiveness of different approaches to chiropractic care. Thus, the current study presents a cost comparison between chiropractic approaches for patients with acute or subacute care episodes for low back pain. Methods We employed a retrospective cohort design to examine costs of chiropractic care among patients diagnosed with acute or subacute low back pain. The study time period ranged between 07/01/2016 and 12/22/2017. We compared cost outcomes for patients of two cohorts of chiropractors within health care system: Cohort 1) a general network of providers, and Cohort 2) a network providing conservative evidence-based care for rapid resolution of pain. We used generalized linear regression modeling to estimate the comparative influence of demographic and clinical factors on expenditures. Results A total of 25,621 unique patients were included in the analyses. The average cost per patient for Cohort 2 (mean allowed amount $252) was lower compared to Cohort 1 (mean allowed amount $326; 0.77, 95% CI 0.75–0.79, p < .001). Patient and clinician related factors such as health plan, provider region, and sex also significantly influenced costs. Conclusions This study comprehensively analyzed cost data associated with the chiropractic care of adults with acute or sub-acute low back pain cared by two cohorts of chiropractic physicians. In general, providers in Cohort 2 were found to be significantly associated with lower costs for patient care as compared to Cohort 1. Utilization of a clinical model characterized by a patient-centered clinic approach and standardized, best-practice clinical protocols may offer lower cost when compared to non-standardized clinical approaches to chiropractic care.
topic Acute or subacute low back pain
Chiropractic care
Cost comparison
Patient care
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-020-00356-z
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesmwhedon costcomparisonoftwoapproachestochiropracticcareforpatientswithacuteandsubacutelowbackpaincareepisodesacohortstudy
AT serenabezdjian costcomparisonoftwoapproachestochiropracticcareforpatientswithacuteandsubacutelowbackpaincareepisodesacohortstudy
AT patriciadennis costcomparisonoftwoapproachestochiropracticcareforpatientswithacuteandsubacutelowbackpaincareepisodesacohortstudy
AT viviannfischer costcomparisonoftwoapproachestochiropracticcareforpatientswithacuteandsubacutelowbackpaincareepisodesacohortstudy
AT robbrussell costcomparisonoftwoapproachestochiropracticcareforpatientswithacuteandsubacutelowbackpaincareepisodesacohortstudy
_version_ 1724376198196232192