Laparoscopic versus laparotomy: Staging surgery for endometrial cancer – Malaysia's early experience

Objective: The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in extrafascial hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Design: This was a retrospective study of small cases over a 5-year period. Setting: This study was conducted in Putrajaya...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan Ghazali, Siti Amira Jamil, Ili Abdullah Sharin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-gmit.com/article.asp?issn=2213-3070;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=25;epage=29;aulast=Ghazali
id doaj-bed0b86b0d764782acd95e6d95211ab8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bed0b86b0d764782acd95e6d95211ab82020-11-24T23:58:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsGynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy2213-30702019-01-0181252910.4103/GMIT.GMIT_25_18Laparoscopic versus laparotomy: Staging surgery for endometrial cancer – Malaysia's early experienceWan Ahmad Hazim Wan GhazaliSiti Amira JamilIli Abdullah SharinObjective: The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in extrafascial hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Design: This was a retrospective study of small cases over a 5-year period. Setting: This study was conducted in Putrajaya Hospital, a district hospital with consultant care level in obstetrics and gynecology. Sample: Forty women presented with confirmed cases of endometrial cancer based on histopathology result and underwent extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy between January 2010 and December 2014. Materials and Methods: Patient outcomes were compared between 26 women who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy and 14 women who underwent open laparotomy extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. Data were collected using electronic medical records. Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative outcomes, operative time, total intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, and total days of postoperative stay were obtained. Results: There was a significant reduction in operative blood loss in the laparoscopic group with mean 262.50 ± 47.87 and laparotomy group with mean 381.82 ± 138.33, 95% confidence interval, P < 0.05. Postoperative hospital stay was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group, where the mean postoperative stay in laparoscopic group was 2.5 ± 2.0 days and laparotomy 5.0 ± 3.6 days. There was no significant difference in mean operative time (the mean operative time: 256 ± 76.40 for laparotomy and 288.75 ± 43.66 for the laparoscopic approach). More number of lymph nodes were harvested laparoscopically (29.75 ± 16.59) than laparotomy (23.0 ± 12.62); however, this was not significant. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery had significant lesser blood loss and it is comparable to laparotomy in the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Experienced surgeon will be able to perform hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy as equally good to laparotomy with adequate tumor excision and complete staging.http://www.e-gmit.com/article.asp?issn=2213-3070;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=25;epage=29;aulast=GhazaliEndometrial cancerlaparotomy hysterectomylaparoscopic hysterectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan Ghazali
Siti Amira Jamil
Ili Abdullah Sharin
spellingShingle Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan Ghazali
Siti Amira Jamil
Ili Abdullah Sharin
Laparoscopic versus laparotomy: Staging surgery for endometrial cancer – Malaysia's early experience
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
Endometrial cancer
laparotomy hysterectomy
laparoscopic hysterectomy
author_facet Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan Ghazali
Siti Amira Jamil
Ili Abdullah Sharin
author_sort Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan Ghazali
title Laparoscopic versus laparotomy: Staging surgery for endometrial cancer – Malaysia's early experience
title_short Laparoscopic versus laparotomy: Staging surgery for endometrial cancer – Malaysia's early experience
title_full Laparoscopic versus laparotomy: Staging surgery for endometrial cancer – Malaysia's early experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus laparotomy: Staging surgery for endometrial cancer – Malaysia's early experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus laparotomy: Staging surgery for endometrial cancer – Malaysia's early experience
title_sort laparoscopic versus laparotomy: staging surgery for endometrial cancer – malaysia's early experience
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy
issn 2213-3070
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objective: The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in extrafascial hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Design: This was a retrospective study of small cases over a 5-year period. Setting: This study was conducted in Putrajaya Hospital, a district hospital with consultant care level in obstetrics and gynecology. Sample: Forty women presented with confirmed cases of endometrial cancer based on histopathology result and underwent extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy between January 2010 and December 2014. Materials and Methods: Patient outcomes were compared between 26 women who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy and 14 women who underwent open laparotomy extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. Data were collected using electronic medical records. Main Outcome Measures: Postoperative outcomes, operative time, total intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, and total days of postoperative stay were obtained. Results: There was a significant reduction in operative blood loss in the laparoscopic group with mean 262.50 ± 47.87 and laparotomy group with mean 381.82 ± 138.33, 95% confidence interval, P < 0.05. Postoperative hospital stay was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group, where the mean postoperative stay in laparoscopic group was 2.5 ± 2.0 days and laparotomy 5.0 ± 3.6 days. There was no significant difference in mean operative time (the mean operative time: 256 ± 76.40 for laparotomy and 288.75 ± 43.66 for the laparoscopic approach). More number of lymph nodes were harvested laparoscopically (29.75 ± 16.59) than laparotomy (23.0 ± 12.62); however, this was not significant. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery had significant lesser blood loss and it is comparable to laparotomy in the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Experienced surgeon will be able to perform hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy as equally good to laparotomy with adequate tumor excision and complete staging.
topic Endometrial cancer
laparotomy hysterectomy
laparoscopic hysterectomy
url http://www.e-gmit.com/article.asp?issn=2213-3070;year=2019;volume=8;issue=1;spage=25;epage=29;aulast=Ghazali
work_keys_str_mv AT wanahmadhazimwanghazali laparoscopicversuslaparotomystagingsurgeryforendometrialcancermalaysiasearlyexperience
AT sitiamirajamil laparoscopicversuslaparotomystagingsurgeryforendometrialcancermalaysiasearlyexperience
AT iliabdullahsharin laparoscopicversuslaparotomystagingsurgeryforendometrialcancermalaysiasearlyexperience
_version_ 1725450159127527424