Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food network

Abstract With consumers and producers seeking alternatives to corporate, industrial food, systems of provision that promise greater ecological and social sustainability have gained in popularity. As these Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) scale up and go mainstream, both scholars and the general publ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liz Carlisle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BioOne 2015-09-01
Series:Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
Subjects:
Online Access:http://elementascience.org/article/info:doi/10.12952/journal.elementa.000066
id doaj-bebe88b07d2d4622bccc9bea14260292
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bebe88b07d2d4622bccc9bea142602922020-11-25T00:45:21ZengBioOneElementa: Science of the Anthropocene2325-10262015-09-0110.12952/journal.elementa.000066ELEMENTA-D-14-00003Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food networkLiz CarlisleAbstract With consumers and producers seeking alternatives to corporate, industrial food, systems of provision that promise greater ecological and social sustainability have gained in popularity. As these Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) scale up and go mainstream, both scholars and the general public want to know who is holding them accountable to their purported goals. In response to such questions, previously informal designations - such as organic - have become formalized, standardized, and institutionalized, and new certifications and business models promise improved traceability and transparency. I suggest, however, that successful alternative food networks - those that deliver on their promises of social and ecological sustainability – may be governed primarily by broad-based moral economies and support networks, and only secondarily by specific certification schemes or value chain quality control. Drawing on ethnographic research with a values-based supply chain on the northern Great Plains, I find that what creates incentives for sustainable practices and holds farmers accountable is less the regulatory component of certification or contractual stipulations of the value chain than the peer review aspect of belonging to the self-organized community that participates in these initiatives. While the organic certification process and values-based supply chain provide vehicles through which the moral economy of sustainable agriculture can operate, the moral economy itself precedes the notion of organic standards, dating back three generations to early twentieth century wheat pools. Since community formation and standard formation are achieved in very different ways, these findings have significant implications for policies aimed at encouraging transitions to more sustainable agricultural practices.http://elementascience.org/article/info:doi/10.12952/journal.elementa.000066sustainable agriculturealternative food networksvalues-based supply chains
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Liz Carlisle
spellingShingle Liz Carlisle
Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food network
Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
sustainable agriculture
alternative food networks
values-based supply chains
author_facet Liz Carlisle
author_sort Liz Carlisle
title Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food network
title_short Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food network
title_full Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food network
title_fullStr Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food network
title_full_unstemmed Audits and agrarianism: The moral economy of an alternative food network
title_sort audits and agrarianism: the moral economy of an alternative food network
publisher BioOne
series Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene
issn 2325-1026
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Abstract With consumers and producers seeking alternatives to corporate, industrial food, systems of provision that promise greater ecological and social sustainability have gained in popularity. As these Alternative Food Networks (AFNs) scale up and go mainstream, both scholars and the general public want to know who is holding them accountable to their purported goals. In response to such questions, previously informal designations - such as organic - have become formalized, standardized, and institutionalized, and new certifications and business models promise improved traceability and transparency. I suggest, however, that successful alternative food networks - those that deliver on their promises of social and ecological sustainability – may be governed primarily by broad-based moral economies and support networks, and only secondarily by specific certification schemes or value chain quality control. Drawing on ethnographic research with a values-based supply chain on the northern Great Plains, I find that what creates incentives for sustainable practices and holds farmers accountable is less the regulatory component of certification or contractual stipulations of the value chain than the peer review aspect of belonging to the self-organized community that participates in these initiatives. While the organic certification process and values-based supply chain provide vehicles through which the moral economy of sustainable agriculture can operate, the moral economy itself precedes the notion of organic standards, dating back three generations to early twentieth century wheat pools. Since community formation and standard formation are achieved in very different ways, these findings have significant implications for policies aimed at encouraging transitions to more sustainable agricultural practices.
topic sustainable agriculture
alternative food networks
values-based supply chains
url http://elementascience.org/article/info:doi/10.12952/journal.elementa.000066
work_keys_str_mv AT lizcarlisle auditsandagrarianismthemoraleconomyofanalternativefoodnetwork
_version_ 1725270687777554432