The Unity and Difference of the Speculative and the Historical in Hegel's Concept of <i>Geist</i>

While Hegel scholars overall have acknowledged that the concept of Geist (Spirit or Mind) is central to Hegel’s comprehension of history, there is some degree of controversy among commentators concerning the interpretation of this concept. Lack of clarity about whether the principles Hegel presents...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David A. Duquette
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2007-06-01
Series:PhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://phaenex.uwindsor.ca/index.php/phaenex/article/view/69
id doaj-be5fc6cf607a4a749452cd62fa061083
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be5fc6cf607a4a749452cd62fa0610832020-11-25T03:28:31ZengUniversity of WindsorPhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture1911-15762007-06-012110.22329/p.v2i1.69The Unity and Difference of the Speculative and the Historical in Hegel's Concept of <i>Geist</i>David A. Duquette0St. Norbert CollegeWhile Hegel scholars overall have acknowledged that the concept of Geist (Spirit or Mind) is central to Hegel’s comprehension of history, there is some degree of controversy among commentators concerning the interpretation of this concept. Lack of clarity about whether the principles Hegel presents fall on the speculative or on the historical level can result in charges of mystification. In this essay I attempt to clarify the concept of Geist by 1) defining the speculative transcendental meaning of Geist, which will involve articulating the principles that structure Geist’s essential features, especially as presented in Hegel’s Logic; 2) explicating the historical and existential dimension of Geist, which will focus on the nature of its action and embodiment, specifically attending to the nation state as the true historical individual, and 3) explaining the essential connection between the speculative and the historical in such a way as to address their dialectical unity in difference, and thus to alleviate the problem of ontology overcoming Geist’s temporality.https://phaenex.uwindsor.ca/index.php/phaenex/article/view/69German Philosophy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David A. Duquette
spellingShingle David A. Duquette
The Unity and Difference of the Speculative and the Historical in Hegel's Concept of <i>Geist</i>
PhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
German Philosophy
author_facet David A. Duquette
author_sort David A. Duquette
title The Unity and Difference of the Speculative and the Historical in Hegel's Concept of <i>Geist</i>
title_short The Unity and Difference of the Speculative and the Historical in Hegel's Concept of <i>Geist</i>
title_full The Unity and Difference of the Speculative and the Historical in Hegel's Concept of <i>Geist</i>
title_fullStr The Unity and Difference of the Speculative and the Historical in Hegel's Concept of <i>Geist</i>
title_full_unstemmed The Unity and Difference of the Speculative and the Historical in Hegel's Concept of <i>Geist</i>
title_sort unity and difference of the speculative and the historical in hegel's concept of <i>geist</i>
publisher University of Windsor
series PhaenEx: Journal of Existential and Phenomenological Theory and Culture
issn 1911-1576
publishDate 2007-06-01
description While Hegel scholars overall have acknowledged that the concept of Geist (Spirit or Mind) is central to Hegel’s comprehension of history, there is some degree of controversy among commentators concerning the interpretation of this concept. Lack of clarity about whether the principles Hegel presents fall on the speculative or on the historical level can result in charges of mystification. In this essay I attempt to clarify the concept of Geist by 1) defining the speculative transcendental meaning of Geist, which will involve articulating the principles that structure Geist’s essential features, especially as presented in Hegel’s Logic; 2) explicating the historical and existential dimension of Geist, which will focus on the nature of its action and embodiment, specifically attending to the nation state as the true historical individual, and 3) explaining the essential connection between the speculative and the historical in such a way as to address their dialectical unity in difference, and thus to alleviate the problem of ontology overcoming Geist’s temporality.
topic German Philosophy
url https://phaenex.uwindsor.ca/index.php/phaenex/article/view/69
work_keys_str_mv AT davidaduquette theunityanddifferenceofthespeculativeandthehistoricalinhegelsconceptofigeisti
AT davidaduquette unityanddifferenceofthespeculativeandthehistoricalinhegelsconceptofigeisti
_version_ 1724583682720661504