A household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the

Background: Random sample surveys of the population are time consuming and expensive, particularly if international sampling is planned. Method: The Healthcare Access Panel was developed as an alternative to face to face or telephone health survey interviews to estimate prevalence or even incidence...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Güther, Bernd, Heinemann, Lothar A.J., Potthoff, Peter
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2004-07-01
Series:GMS German Medical Science
Online Access:http://www.egms.de/en/gms/2004-2/000015.shtml
id doaj-be266abd209744618521a3bc1b56dc6f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be266abd209744618521a3bc1b56dc6f2020-11-25T02:19:37ZdeuGerman Medical Science GMS Publishing HouseGMS German Medical Science1612-31742004-07-012Doc05A household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the Güther, BerndHeinemann, Lothar A.J.Potthoff, PeterBackground: Random sample surveys of the population are time consuming and expensive, particularly if international sampling is planned. Method: The Healthcare Access Panel was developed as an alternative to face to face or telephone health survey interviews to estimate prevalence or even incidence rates of health-relevant variables in the population. It is the objective of this paper to demonstrate the validity of health-related data obtained with the Healthcare Access Panel compared with results from other, population-based data sources. The example is Germany, where the Panel consists of more than 78,000 individuals aged between 0 and 79 years. Results: The Healthcare Access Panel reflects the population concerning age, sex, and regional structure with a good correlation. The hospitalisation rate obtained with the Panel matches the official National Hospital Discharge Statistics. Annual consultations with major medical disciplines were found to be almost identical in the Healthcare Access Panel as compared with the German National Health Survey (GNHS). The Healthcare Access Panel data matched the GNHS prevalence results of self-reported medical conditions/diseases. Advantages and disadvantages of the Healthcare Access Panel compared with specially designed population field surveys are discussed. Conclusion: It is worthwhile to consider the Healthcare Access Panel approach as a cost-effective alternative to other population-based data collection methods under many circumstances, i.e. considering the specific methodological pros and cons as necessary for any other method.http://www.egms.de/en/gms/2004-2/000015.shtml
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Güther, Bernd
Heinemann, Lothar A.J.
Potthoff, Peter
spellingShingle Güther, Bernd
Heinemann, Lothar A.J.
Potthoff, Peter
A household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the
GMS German Medical Science
author_facet Güther, Bernd
Heinemann, Lothar A.J.
Potthoff, Peter
author_sort Güther, Bernd
title A household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the
title_short A household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the
title_full A household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the
title_fullStr A household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the
title_full_unstemmed A household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the
title_sort household panel as a tool for cost-effective health-related population surveys: validity of the
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
series GMS German Medical Science
issn 1612-3174
publishDate 2004-07-01
description Background: Random sample surveys of the population are time consuming and expensive, particularly if international sampling is planned. Method: The Healthcare Access Panel was developed as an alternative to face to face or telephone health survey interviews to estimate prevalence or even incidence rates of health-relevant variables in the population. It is the objective of this paper to demonstrate the validity of health-related data obtained with the Healthcare Access Panel compared with results from other, population-based data sources. The example is Germany, where the Panel consists of more than 78,000 individuals aged between 0 and 79 years. Results: The Healthcare Access Panel reflects the population concerning age, sex, and regional structure with a good correlation. The hospitalisation rate obtained with the Panel matches the official National Hospital Discharge Statistics. Annual consultations with major medical disciplines were found to be almost identical in the Healthcare Access Panel as compared with the German National Health Survey (GNHS). The Healthcare Access Panel data matched the GNHS prevalence results of self-reported medical conditions/diseases. Advantages and disadvantages of the Healthcare Access Panel compared with specially designed population field surveys are discussed. Conclusion: It is worthwhile to consider the Healthcare Access Panel approach as a cost-effective alternative to other population-based data collection methods under many circumstances, i.e. considering the specific methodological pros and cons as necessary for any other method.
url http://www.egms.de/en/gms/2004-2/000015.shtml
work_keys_str_mv AT gutherbernd ahouseholdpanelasatoolforcosteffectivehealthrelatedpopulationsurveysvalidityofthe
AT heinemannlotharaj ahouseholdpanelasatoolforcosteffectivehealthrelatedpopulationsurveysvalidityofthe
AT potthoffpeter ahouseholdpanelasatoolforcosteffectivehealthrelatedpopulationsurveysvalidityofthe
AT gutherbernd householdpanelasatoolforcosteffectivehealthrelatedpopulationsurveysvalidityofthe
AT heinemannlotharaj householdpanelasatoolforcosteffectivehealthrelatedpopulationsurveysvalidityofthe
AT potthoffpeter householdpanelasatoolforcosteffectivehealthrelatedpopulationsurveysvalidityofthe
_version_ 1724875516579676160