Sustainable City Lighting Impact and Evaluation Methodology of Lighting Quality from a User Perspective

High quality artificial lighting of public places is one of the necessary functions of sustainable cities. It is much more than just providing sufficient light intensity with reduced energy consumption and low environmental impact. The solution to this challenge is not only technological, but also r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Melita Rozman Cafuta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3409
id doaj-be240dc304aa469fbf038bc37c259d39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be240dc304aa469fbf038bc37c259d392021-03-20T00:02:45ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-03-01133409340910.3390/su13063409Sustainable City Lighting Impact and Evaluation Methodology of Lighting Quality from a User PerspectiveMelita Rozman Cafuta0Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture, University of Maribor, Smetanova ulica 17, 2000 Maribor, SloveniaHigh quality artificial lighting of public places is one of the necessary functions of sustainable cities. It is much more than just providing sufficient light intensity with reduced energy consumption and low environmental impact. The solution to this challenge is not only technological, but also requires the consideration of the subjective approach, such as psychological, sociological, and aesthetic-functional. The article presents the SEC (Suitable for everyone, Environmentally-accepted, Cost-effective) methodology and model, which are placed in the context of sustainable city lighting. A holistic assessment approach of user environmental perception, priorities, and spatial responses is required to evaluate the impact of artificial night illumination. Lighting efficiency was expressed as the correspondence between environmental perception and spatial utilization during day and night. Ten sites with different urban background and illumination characteristics were selected. It was assumed that artificial night lighting influences the perception, priorities, and responsiveness of users. The validity of this argument was demonstrated at a relevant statistical level of <i>p</i> <0.05. The research results provided useful information about the current state, which is needed to prepare a sustainable lighting strategy, and could be compared between different or similar sites. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that the artificial lighting of urban open spaces is of high quality when the difference in the spatial perception and spatial utilization between day and night is as small as possible.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3409artificial night lightingevaluation frameworklighting qualityurban open spacesustainability model SECenvironmental perception
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melita Rozman Cafuta
spellingShingle Melita Rozman Cafuta
Sustainable City Lighting Impact and Evaluation Methodology of Lighting Quality from a User Perspective
Sustainability
artificial night lighting
evaluation framework
lighting quality
urban open space
sustainability model SEC
environmental perception
author_facet Melita Rozman Cafuta
author_sort Melita Rozman Cafuta
title Sustainable City Lighting Impact and Evaluation Methodology of Lighting Quality from a User Perspective
title_short Sustainable City Lighting Impact and Evaluation Methodology of Lighting Quality from a User Perspective
title_full Sustainable City Lighting Impact and Evaluation Methodology of Lighting Quality from a User Perspective
title_fullStr Sustainable City Lighting Impact and Evaluation Methodology of Lighting Quality from a User Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Sustainable City Lighting Impact and Evaluation Methodology of Lighting Quality from a User Perspective
title_sort sustainable city lighting impact and evaluation methodology of lighting quality from a user perspective
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-03-01
description High quality artificial lighting of public places is one of the necessary functions of sustainable cities. It is much more than just providing sufficient light intensity with reduced energy consumption and low environmental impact. The solution to this challenge is not only technological, but also requires the consideration of the subjective approach, such as psychological, sociological, and aesthetic-functional. The article presents the SEC (Suitable for everyone, Environmentally-accepted, Cost-effective) methodology and model, which are placed in the context of sustainable city lighting. A holistic assessment approach of user environmental perception, priorities, and spatial responses is required to evaluate the impact of artificial night illumination. Lighting efficiency was expressed as the correspondence between environmental perception and spatial utilization during day and night. Ten sites with different urban background and illumination characteristics were selected. It was assumed that artificial night lighting influences the perception, priorities, and responsiveness of users. The validity of this argument was demonstrated at a relevant statistical level of <i>p</i> <0.05. The research results provided useful information about the current state, which is needed to prepare a sustainable lighting strategy, and could be compared between different or similar sites. Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that the artificial lighting of urban open spaces is of high quality when the difference in the spatial perception and spatial utilization between day and night is as small as possible.
topic artificial night lighting
evaluation framework
lighting quality
urban open space
sustainability model SEC
environmental perception
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/6/3409
work_keys_str_mv AT melitarozmancafuta sustainablecitylightingimpactandevaluationmethodologyoflightingqualityfromauserperspective
_version_ 1724212490853679104