Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?

The literature on International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) predicts a rather low number of signatories to an IEA. This is in sharp contrast to empirical evidence. As experimental economics provides some evidence for more complex human behavior, extending the theory of IEAs to a broader class of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christine Grüning, Wolfgang Peters
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2010-06-01
Series:Games
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/1/2/137/
id doaj-be10fdbe889248ad8c1feff1d078e38a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be10fdbe889248ad8c1feff1d078e38a2020-11-25T01:07:35ZengMDPI AGGames2073-43362010-06-011213715810.3390/g1020137Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?Christine GrüningWolfgang PetersThe literature on International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) predicts a rather low number of signatories to an IEA. This is in sharp contrast to empirical evidence. As experimental economics provides some evidence for more complex human behavior, extending the theory of IEAs to a broader class of preferences is clearly promising. The present paper shows that where countries’ preferences incorporate justice and fairness there will be a strong incentive for them to choose similar abatement policies within and outside an IEA. Consequently, free-riding at the expense of the signatory states diminishes and participation in an IEA becomes a more successful strategy, so that the size of stable IEAs increases. http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/1/2/137/International Environmental Agreementscoalition formationjustice and fairness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christine Grüning
Wolfgang Peters
spellingShingle Christine Grüning
Wolfgang Peters
Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?
Games
International Environmental Agreements
coalition formation
justice and fairness
author_facet Christine Grüning
Wolfgang Peters
author_sort Christine Grüning
title Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?
title_short Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?
title_full Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?
title_fullStr Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?
title_full_unstemmed Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?
title_sort can justice and fairness enlarge international environmental agreements?
publisher MDPI AG
series Games
issn 2073-4336
publishDate 2010-06-01
description The literature on International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) predicts a rather low number of signatories to an IEA. This is in sharp contrast to empirical evidence. As experimental economics provides some evidence for more complex human behavior, extending the theory of IEAs to a broader class of preferences is clearly promising. The present paper shows that where countries’ preferences incorporate justice and fairness there will be a strong incentive for them to choose similar abatement policies within and outside an IEA. Consequently, free-riding at the expense of the signatory states diminishes and participation in an IEA becomes a more successful strategy, so that the size of stable IEAs increases.
topic International Environmental Agreements
coalition formation
justice and fairness
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/1/2/137/
work_keys_str_mv AT christinegruning canjusticeandfairnessenlargeinternationalenvironmentalagreements
AT wolfgangpeters canjusticeandfairnessenlargeinternationalenvironmentalagreements
_version_ 1725186629394497536