Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?
The literature on International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) predicts a rather low number of signatories to an IEA. This is in sharp contrast to empirical evidence. As experimental economics provides some evidence for more complex human behavior, extending the theory of IEAs to a broader class of...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2010-06-01
|
Series: | Games |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/1/2/137/ |
id |
doaj-be10fdbe889248ad8c1feff1d078e38a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-be10fdbe889248ad8c1feff1d078e38a2020-11-25T01:07:35ZengMDPI AGGames2073-43362010-06-011213715810.3390/g1020137Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements?Christine GrüningWolfgang PetersThe literature on International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) predicts a rather low number of signatories to an IEA. This is in sharp contrast to empirical evidence. As experimental economics provides some evidence for more complex human behavior, extending the theory of IEAs to a broader class of preferences is clearly promising. The present paper shows that where countries’ preferences incorporate justice and fairness there will be a strong incentive for them to choose similar abatement policies within and outside an IEA. Consequently, free-riding at the expense of the signatory states diminishes and participation in an IEA becomes a more successful strategy, so that the size of stable IEAs increases. http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/1/2/137/International Environmental Agreementscoalition formationjustice and fairness |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Christine Grüning Wolfgang Peters |
spellingShingle |
Christine Grüning Wolfgang Peters Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements? Games International Environmental Agreements coalition formation justice and fairness |
author_facet |
Christine Grüning Wolfgang Peters |
author_sort |
Christine Grüning |
title |
Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements? |
title_short |
Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements? |
title_full |
Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements? |
title_fullStr |
Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Can Justice and Fairness Enlarge International Environmental Agreements? |
title_sort |
can justice and fairness enlarge international environmental agreements? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Games |
issn |
2073-4336 |
publishDate |
2010-06-01 |
description |
The literature on International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) predicts a rather low number of signatories to an IEA. This is in sharp contrast to empirical evidence. As experimental economics provides some evidence for more complex human behavior, extending the theory of IEAs to a broader class of preferences is clearly promising. The present paper shows that where countries’ preferences incorporate justice and fairness there will be a strong incentive for them to choose similar abatement policies within and outside an IEA. Consequently, free-riding at the expense of the signatory states diminishes and participation in an IEA becomes a more successful strategy, so that the size of stable IEAs increases. |
topic |
International Environmental Agreements coalition formation justice and fairness |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4336/1/2/137/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT christinegruning canjusticeandfairnessenlargeinternationalenvironmentalagreements AT wolfgangpeters canjusticeandfairnessenlargeinternationalenvironmentalagreements |
_version_ |
1725186629394497536 |