Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.

<h4>Background</h4>The variability of NT-proBNP levels has been studied in heart failure, yet no data exist on these changes over time in hypertensive patients. Furthermore, studies on the relationship between natriuretic peptides and inflammatory status are limited.<h4>Methodology...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Esther Roselló-Lletí, Jose R Calabuig, Pedro Morillas, Raquel Cortés, Luis Martínez-Dolz, Luis Almenar, Jose R González-Juanatey, Catheline Lauwers, Antonio Salvador, Manuel Portolés, Vicente Bertomeu, Miguel Rivera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22384001/?tool=EBI
id doaj-be0dbcfc85594626ae0537eb964283e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-be0dbcfc85594626ae0537eb964283e32021-03-04T01:00:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0172e3118910.1371/journal.pone.0031189Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.Esther Roselló-LletíJose R CalabuigPedro MorillasRaquel CortésLuis Martínez-DolzLuis AlmenarJose R González-JuanateyCatheline LauwersAntonio SalvadorManuel PortolésVicente BertomeuMiguel Rivera<h4>Background</h4>The variability of NT-proBNP levels has been studied in heart failure, yet no data exist on these changes over time in hypertensive patients. Furthermore, studies on the relationship between natriuretic peptides and inflammatory status are limited.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>220 clinically and functionally asymptomatic stable patients (age 59 ± 13, 120 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up, and NT-proBNP was measured at baseline, 12 and 24 months. No differences in NT-proBNP were found with respect to the basal stage in the hypertrophic group, but significant changes were found in non-hypertrophic subjects. The reproducibility of NT-proBNP measurements was better in patients with hypertrophy than in the non-hypertrophic group for the three intervals (stage I-basal; stage II-stage I; stage II-basal) with a reference change value of 34%, 35% and 41%, respectively, in the hypertrophic group. A more elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained in the hypertrophic group than in patients without hypertrophy: basal versus stage I (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.59, p < 0.0001) and stage I versus stage II (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.56, p < 0.0001). Finally, levels of NT-proBNP significantly correlated with sTNF-R1 (p < 0.0001) and IL-6 (p < 0.01) during follow-up. A multivariate linear regression analysis showed that sTNF-R1 is an independent factor of NT-proBNP.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>This work shows that there is good stability in NT-proBNP levels in a follow-up study of asymptomatic patients with stable hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. As a consequence, assessment of NT-proBNP concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of hypertensive patients with hypertrophy. Measured variations in peptide levels, exceeding 35% in a 12-month follow-up and 41% in a 24-month follow-up, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, and therefore implies adjustment in the medical treatment. In addition, this study shows a link between neurohormonal and inflammatory activation in these patients.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22384001/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Esther Roselló-Lletí
Jose R Calabuig
Pedro Morillas
Raquel Cortés
Luis Martínez-Dolz
Luis Almenar
Jose R González-Juanatey
Catheline Lauwers
Antonio Salvador
Manuel Portolés
Vicente Bertomeu
Miguel Rivera
spellingShingle Esther Roselló-Lletí
Jose R Calabuig
Pedro Morillas
Raquel Cortés
Luis Martínez-Dolz
Luis Almenar
Jose R González-Juanatey
Catheline Lauwers
Antonio Salvador
Manuel Portolés
Vicente Bertomeu
Miguel Rivera
Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Esther Roselló-Lletí
Jose R Calabuig
Pedro Morillas
Raquel Cortés
Luis Martínez-Dolz
Luis Almenar
Jose R González-Juanatey
Catheline Lauwers
Antonio Salvador
Manuel Portolés
Vicente Bertomeu
Miguel Rivera
author_sort Esther Roselló-Lletí
title Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.
title_short Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.
title_full Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.
title_fullStr Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.
title_full_unstemmed Variability of NT-proBNP and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.
title_sort variability of nt-probnp and its relationship with inflammatory status in patients with stable essential hypertension: a 2-year follow-up study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description <h4>Background</h4>The variability of NT-proBNP levels has been studied in heart failure, yet no data exist on these changes over time in hypertensive patients. Furthermore, studies on the relationship between natriuretic peptides and inflammatory status are limited.<h4>Methodology/principal findings</h4>220 clinically and functionally asymptomatic stable patients (age 59 ± 13, 120 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up, and NT-proBNP was measured at baseline, 12 and 24 months. No differences in NT-proBNP were found with respect to the basal stage in the hypertrophic group, but significant changes were found in non-hypertrophic subjects. The reproducibility of NT-proBNP measurements was better in patients with hypertrophy than in the non-hypertrophic group for the three intervals (stage I-basal; stage II-stage I; stage II-basal) with a reference change value of 34%, 35% and 41%, respectively, in the hypertrophic group. A more elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained in the hypertrophic group than in patients without hypertrophy: basal versus stage I (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.59, p < 0.0001) and stage I versus stage II (r = 0.86, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.56, p < 0.0001). Finally, levels of NT-proBNP significantly correlated with sTNF-R1 (p < 0.0001) and IL-6 (p < 0.01) during follow-up. A multivariate linear regression analysis showed that sTNF-R1 is an independent factor of NT-proBNP.<h4>Conclusions/significance</h4>This work shows that there is good stability in NT-proBNP levels in a follow-up study of asymptomatic patients with stable hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. As a consequence, assessment of NT-proBNP concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of hypertensive patients with hypertrophy. Measured variations in peptide levels, exceeding 35% in a 12-month follow-up and 41% in a 24-month follow-up, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, and therefore implies adjustment in the medical treatment. In addition, this study shows a link between neurohormonal and inflammatory activation in these patients.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22384001/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT estherrosellolleti variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT josercalabuig variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT pedromorillas variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT raquelcortes variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT luismartinezdolz variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT luisalmenar variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT josergonzalezjuanatey variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT cathelinelauwers variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT antoniosalvador variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT manuelportoles variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT vicentebertomeu variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
AT miguelrivera variabilityofntprobnpanditsrelationshipwithinflammatorystatusinpatientswithstableessentialhypertensiona2yearfollowupstudy
_version_ 1714809762315501568