Market, Management and Profession. Social Business in the Polder.

In a recent policy document of the organized employers in the care and welfare sector in The Netherlands (the MO Group), directors and board members of care and welfare institutions present themselves as "social entrepreneurs", managing their institutions as look-a like commercial comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Willem Blok
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Social Work & Society 2004-01-01
Series:Social Work and Society
Online Access:https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/249
id doaj-bdf8b7afefb945deb7a7c8f1032c02b7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bdf8b7afefb945deb7a7c8f1032c02b72021-05-29T05:41:46ZengSocial Work & SocietySocial Work and Society1613-89532004-01-0121Market, Management and Profession. Social Business in the Polder.Willem BlokIn a recent policy document of the organized employers in the care and welfare sector in The Netherlands (the MO Group), directors and board members of care and welfare institutions present themselves as "social entrepreneurs", managing their institutions as look-a like commercial companies. They are hardly criticized and there is not any countervailing power of significance. The workers are focusing on their own specialized professional fields and divided as a whole. Many government officials are in favour or do not bother. The relatively small number of intellectual workers in Dutch care and welfare are fragmented and pragmatic. From a democratic point of view this is a worrying situation. From a professional point of view the purpose and functions of professional care and welfare work are at stake. The penetration of market mechanisms and the take-over by commercially orientated managers result from unquestioned adaptation of Anglo-Saxon policy in The Netherlands in the 1990's, following the crisis of the Welfare State in the late 1980's. The polder country is now confronted fully with the pressure and negative effects of unbalanced powers in the institutions, i.e. Managerialism. After years of silence, the two principal authentic critics of Dutch care and welfare, Harry Kunneman and Andries Baart, are no longer voices crying in the wilderness, but are getting a response from a growing number of worried workers and intellectuals. Kunneman and Baart warn against the restriction of professional space and the loss of normative values and standards in the profession. They are right. It is high time to make room for criticism and to start a debate about the future of the social professions in The Netherlands, better: in Europe. Research, discussion and action have to prove how worrying the everyday situation of professional workers is, what goals have to be set and what strategy to be chosen.https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/249
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Willem Blok
spellingShingle Willem Blok
Market, Management and Profession. Social Business in the Polder.
Social Work and Society
author_facet Willem Blok
author_sort Willem Blok
title Market, Management and Profession. Social Business in the Polder.
title_short Market, Management and Profession. Social Business in the Polder.
title_full Market, Management and Profession. Social Business in the Polder.
title_fullStr Market, Management and Profession. Social Business in the Polder.
title_full_unstemmed Market, Management and Profession. Social Business in the Polder.
title_sort market, management and profession. social business in the polder.
publisher Social Work & Society
series Social Work and Society
issn 1613-8953
publishDate 2004-01-01
description In a recent policy document of the organized employers in the care and welfare sector in The Netherlands (the MO Group), directors and board members of care and welfare institutions present themselves as "social entrepreneurs", managing their institutions as look-a like commercial companies. They are hardly criticized and there is not any countervailing power of significance. The workers are focusing on their own specialized professional fields and divided as a whole. Many government officials are in favour or do not bother. The relatively small number of intellectual workers in Dutch care and welfare are fragmented and pragmatic. From a democratic point of view this is a worrying situation. From a professional point of view the purpose and functions of professional care and welfare work are at stake. The penetration of market mechanisms and the take-over by commercially orientated managers result from unquestioned adaptation of Anglo-Saxon policy in The Netherlands in the 1990's, following the crisis of the Welfare State in the late 1980's. The polder country is now confronted fully with the pressure and negative effects of unbalanced powers in the institutions, i.e. Managerialism. After years of silence, the two principal authentic critics of Dutch care and welfare, Harry Kunneman and Andries Baart, are no longer voices crying in the wilderness, but are getting a response from a growing number of worried workers and intellectuals. Kunneman and Baart warn against the restriction of professional space and the loss of normative values and standards in the profession. They are right. It is high time to make room for criticism and to start a debate about the future of the social professions in The Netherlands, better: in Europe. Research, discussion and action have to prove how worrying the everyday situation of professional workers is, what goals have to be set and what strategy to be chosen.
url https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/249
work_keys_str_mv AT willemblok marketmanagementandprofessionsocialbusinessinthepolder
_version_ 1721422500078813184