Anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.

The incidence of diabetes, atherosclerosis and sudden cardiac death is high among obese individuals, with significant metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects being observed when obesity is centered in the abdominal region. The objective of this study was to determine which of the anthropometric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Francisco José Gondim Pitanga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2011-04-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/16114
id doaj-bde667a167ab4373948399a66b490b66
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bde667a167ab4373948399a66b490b662020-11-25T02:55:51ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaRevista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano1415-84261980-00372011-04-0113323824110.5007/1980-0037.2011v13n3p23814801Anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.Francisco José Gondim Pitanga0Universidade Federal da Bahia. Departamento de Educação Física. Salvador, BA. Brazil.The incidence of diabetes, atherosclerosis and sudden cardiac death is high among obese individuals, with significant metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects being observed when obesity is centered in the abdominal region. The objective of this study was to determine which of the anthropometric indicators of abdominal obesity commonly used show the highest predictive power to discriminate a high coronary risk (HCR) and to propose cut-off values for their use in clinical practice and in population studies on Brazilian adults. The studies publi-shed by the research group on non-transmissible chronic diseases of the Public Health Institute (PHI), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), that compare different anthropometric indicators as predictors of HCR were analyzed. The evidence provided by the studies analyzed suggests the use of the conicity index for the evaluation of abdominal obesity in clinical practice, with cut-off values of 1.25 for men and of 1.18 and 1.22 for women ≤ 49 years and > 50 years, respectively. The waist-height ratio should be used in population studies, with the recommendation that waist should not exceed half the height of a particular subject.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/16114abdominal obesityanthropometric indicatorscoronary risk.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francisco José Gondim Pitanga
spellingShingle Francisco José Gondim Pitanga
Anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
abdominal obesity
anthropometric indicators
coronary risk.
author_facet Francisco José Gondim Pitanga
author_sort Francisco José Gondim Pitanga
title Anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.
title_short Anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.
title_full Anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.
title_fullStr Anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.
title_full_unstemmed Anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.
title_sort anthropometry for the assessment of abdominal obesity and coronary risk.
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
series Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
issn 1415-8426
1980-0037
publishDate 2011-04-01
description The incidence of diabetes, atherosclerosis and sudden cardiac death is high among obese individuals, with significant metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects being observed when obesity is centered in the abdominal region. The objective of this study was to determine which of the anthropometric indicators of abdominal obesity commonly used show the highest predictive power to discriminate a high coronary risk (HCR) and to propose cut-off values for their use in clinical practice and in population studies on Brazilian adults. The studies publi-shed by the research group on non-transmissible chronic diseases of the Public Health Institute (PHI), Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), that compare different anthropometric indicators as predictors of HCR were analyzed. The evidence provided by the studies analyzed suggests the use of the conicity index for the evaluation of abdominal obesity in clinical practice, with cut-off values of 1.25 for men and of 1.18 and 1.22 for women ≤ 49 years and > 50 years, respectively. The waist-height ratio should be used in population studies, with the recommendation that waist should not exceed half the height of a particular subject.
topic abdominal obesity
anthropometric indicators
coronary risk.
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/16114
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscojosegondimpitanga anthropometryfortheassessmentofabdominalobesityandcoronaryrisk
_version_ 1724715769584943104