Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Aim: We aimed to compare the survival outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) for patients with small early-stage primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Methods: Patients with small (≤5 cm) and early-stage ICC were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, an...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.540662/full |
id |
doaj-bdc3842e38794fb3ac337377d85ccccc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bdc3842e38794fb3ac337377d85ccccc2020-11-25T03:12:23ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-09-011010.3389/fonc.2020.540662540662Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaXin Xiang0Daixing Hu1Zheng Jin2Pan Liu3Huapeng Lin4Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, ChinaDepartment of Endocrine and Breast Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, ChinaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Neijiang, Neijiang, ChinaDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaAim: We aimed to compare the survival outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) for patients with small early-stage primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Methods: Patients with small (≤5 cm) and early-stage ICC were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates between the SR and RFA patients were evaluated. The results were verified using an inverse probability-weighting model (IPTW).Results: In total, 184 patients with small T1 stage ICC that received RFA or SR treatment were identified. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.4, 73.3, and 61.5% for patients who underwent SR, respectively, and 89.9, 42.4, and 23.9%, respectively, for patients who received RFA. CSS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.5, 73.8, and 66.1%, respectively, for the SR group and 93.5, 53.4, and 30.0%, respectively, for the RFA group. The OS and CSS rates were evaluated to be significantly better in the SR group than in the RFA group after the multivariate Cox regression and IPTW analysis. Subsequently, the survival benefit of SR was also observed in the subgroup of patients with <4.5 or <4 cm early-stage ICC when compared with RFA.Conclusion: Our results indicated that the SR provided a significantly better prognosis than RFA in patients with small and early-stage ICC. SR as the first-line treatment of primary early-stage ICC is still recommended. However, prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are required to compare these modalities in the treatment of ICC.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.540662/fullradiofrequency ablationintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaearly-stagesurvivalSEER |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xin Xiang Daixing Hu Zheng Jin Pan Liu Huapeng Lin |
spellingShingle |
Xin Xiang Daixing Hu Zheng Jin Pan Liu Huapeng Lin Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Frontiers in Oncology radiofrequency ablation intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma early-stage survival SEER |
author_facet |
Xin Xiang Daixing Hu Zheng Jin Pan Liu Huapeng Lin |
author_sort |
Xin Xiang |
title |
Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_short |
Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full |
Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_fullStr |
Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed |
Radiofrequency Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Small Early-Stage Primary Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma |
title_sort |
radiofrequency ablation vs. surgical resection for small early-stage primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Oncology |
issn |
2234-943X |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Aim: We aimed to compare the survival outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and surgical resection (SR) for patients with small early-stage primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Methods: Patients with small (≤5 cm) and early-stage ICC were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates between the SR and RFA patients were evaluated. The results were verified using an inverse probability-weighting model (IPTW).Results: In total, 184 patients with small T1 stage ICC that received RFA or SR treatment were identified. The OS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.4, 73.3, and 61.5% for patients who underwent SR, respectively, and 89.9, 42.4, and 23.9%, respectively, for patients who received RFA. CSS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.5, 73.8, and 66.1%, respectively, for the SR group and 93.5, 53.4, and 30.0%, respectively, for the RFA group. The OS and CSS rates were evaluated to be significantly better in the SR group than in the RFA group after the multivariate Cox regression and IPTW analysis. Subsequently, the survival benefit of SR was also observed in the subgroup of patients with <4.5 or <4 cm early-stage ICC when compared with RFA.Conclusion: Our results indicated that the SR provided a significantly better prognosis than RFA in patients with small and early-stage ICC. SR as the first-line treatment of primary early-stage ICC is still recommended. However, prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are required to compare these modalities in the treatment of ICC. |
topic |
radiofrequency ablation intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma early-stage survival SEER |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fonc.2020.540662/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xinxiang radiofrequencyablationvssurgicalresectionforsmallearlystageprimaryintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT daixinghu radiofrequencyablationvssurgicalresectionforsmallearlystageprimaryintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT zhengjin radiofrequencyablationvssurgicalresectionforsmallearlystageprimaryintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT panliu radiofrequencyablationvssurgicalresectionforsmallearlystageprimaryintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma AT huapenglin radiofrequencyablationvssurgicalresectionforsmallearlystageprimaryintrahepaticcholangiocarcinoma |
_version_ |
1724650718441242624 |