EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXOTIC SUGARCANE GENOTYPES

This research was conducted at research area of Sugarcane Research Institute (Faisalabad, Pakistan) to evaluate the best sugarcane clones amongst twenty eight clones against two standard varietiesHSF-240 and CPF-249 for different agronomic traits and yield characters during the crop season of 2016-2...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khaliq A., Yasin M., Afzal M.S., Ahmad N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences 2018-04-01
Series:Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rjoas.com/issue-2018-04/article_31.pdf
id doaj-bda432200db64c0b8e252b3dee6dd39d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bda432200db64c0b8e252b3dee6dd39d2020-11-24T23:56:06ZengRussian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic SciencesRussian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences2226-11842018-04-0176429630110.18551/rjoas.2018-04.31EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXOTIC SUGARCANE GENOTYPESKhaliq A.0Yasin M.1Afzal M.S.2Ahmad N.3Sugarcane Research Institute of FaisalabadSugarcane Research Institute of FaisalabadSugarcane Research Institute of FaisalabadSugarcane Research Institute of FaisalabadThis research was conducted at research area of Sugarcane Research Institute (Faisalabad, Pakistan) to evaluate the best sugarcane clones amongst twenty eight clones against two standard varietiesHSF-240 and CPF-249 for different agronomic traits and yield characters during the crop season of 2016-2017 at third selection stage of variety development. In the experiment, three clones (S2014-SL-1322, S2014-SL-1359, S2014-SL-1372) out of twenty eight (11%) were selected on the basis of good performance and did not show splits, lodging tendency, pithiness, aerials roots, disease infestation and these showed good crop stand and thick canes. These three clones were promoted to next stage of variety development cycle. In set-1, Clone S2014-SL-347 gave higher cane yield (58.37 tha-1) with sugar yield of 7.18 tha-1. But it showed some characters of high aerial roots and pithiness and so rejected. In set-II, the clone S2014-SL-1224 gave higher cane yield of 71.51t ha-1 with 8.73t ha-1 sugar yield and showed high disease infestation of red rot and smut and so rejected. But S2014-SL-1322, S2014-SL-1359, S2014-SL-1372 produced cane yield of 71.37 t ha-1 , 68.56 t ha-1 , 67.33 t ha-1 with 8.71 t ha-1, 8.34 t ha-1 , 8.31 t ha-1 sugar yield respectively. The remaining twenty five clones (89%) out of twenty eight were rejected due to diseases susceptibility, lodging, pithiness, poor crop stand, aerial roots and high splits.https://rjoas.com/issue-2018-04/article_31.pdfAerial rootsclonesmutfuzzpithiness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Khaliq A.
Yasin M.
Afzal M.S.
Ahmad N.
spellingShingle Khaliq A.
Yasin M.
Afzal M.S.
Ahmad N.
EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXOTIC SUGARCANE GENOTYPES
Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences
Aerial roots
clone
smut
fuzz
pithiness
author_facet Khaliq A.
Yasin M.
Afzal M.S.
Ahmad N.
author_sort Khaliq A.
title EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXOTIC SUGARCANE GENOTYPES
title_short EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXOTIC SUGARCANE GENOTYPES
title_full EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXOTIC SUGARCANE GENOTYPES
title_fullStr EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXOTIC SUGARCANE GENOTYPES
title_full_unstemmed EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT EXOTIC SUGARCANE GENOTYPES
title_sort evaluation of different exotic sugarcane genotypes
publisher Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences
series Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences
issn 2226-1184
publishDate 2018-04-01
description This research was conducted at research area of Sugarcane Research Institute (Faisalabad, Pakistan) to evaluate the best sugarcane clones amongst twenty eight clones against two standard varietiesHSF-240 and CPF-249 for different agronomic traits and yield characters during the crop season of 2016-2017 at third selection stage of variety development. In the experiment, three clones (S2014-SL-1322, S2014-SL-1359, S2014-SL-1372) out of twenty eight (11%) were selected on the basis of good performance and did not show splits, lodging tendency, pithiness, aerials roots, disease infestation and these showed good crop stand and thick canes. These three clones were promoted to next stage of variety development cycle. In set-1, Clone S2014-SL-347 gave higher cane yield (58.37 tha-1) with sugar yield of 7.18 tha-1. But it showed some characters of high aerial roots and pithiness and so rejected. In set-II, the clone S2014-SL-1224 gave higher cane yield of 71.51t ha-1 with 8.73t ha-1 sugar yield and showed high disease infestation of red rot and smut and so rejected. But S2014-SL-1322, S2014-SL-1359, S2014-SL-1372 produced cane yield of 71.37 t ha-1 , 68.56 t ha-1 , 67.33 t ha-1 with 8.71 t ha-1, 8.34 t ha-1 , 8.31 t ha-1 sugar yield respectively. The remaining twenty five clones (89%) out of twenty eight were rejected due to diseases susceptibility, lodging, pithiness, poor crop stand, aerial roots and high splits.
topic Aerial roots
clone
smut
fuzz
pithiness
url https://rjoas.com/issue-2018-04/article_31.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT khaliqa evaluationofdifferentexoticsugarcanegenotypes
AT yasinm evaluationofdifferentexoticsugarcanegenotypes
AT afzalms evaluationofdifferentexoticsugarcanegenotypes
AT ahmadn evaluationofdifferentexoticsugarcanegenotypes
_version_ 1725459661048512512