Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of Venezuela

Whole blood samples (N = 295) were obtained from different locations in Amazonas and Sucre States, in Venezuela. Malaria was diagnosed by microscopy, OptiMAL™ and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum, and P. malariae being detected when possible. We identif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H Rodulfo, M De Donato, R Mora, L González, C.E Contreras
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2007-04-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2007000400012
id doaj-bd89864b1bbb42d7928c45fd03b84137
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd89864b1bbb42d7928c45fd03b841372020-11-25T01:02:52ZengAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação CientíficaBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research0100-879X1414-431X2007-04-01404535543Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of VenezuelaH RodulfoM De DonatoR MoraL GonzálezC.E ContrerasWhole blood samples (N = 295) were obtained from different locations in Amazonas and Sucre States, in Venezuela. Malaria was diagnosed by microscopy, OptiMAL™ and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum, and P. malariae being detected when possible. We identified 93 infections, 66 of which were caused by P. vivax, 26 by P. falciparum, and 1 was a mixed infection. No infection caused by P. malariae was detected. The sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic method were high: 95.7 and 97.9% for microscopy, 87.0 and 97.9% for OptiMAL, and 98.0 and 100% for PCR, respectively. Most samples (72.2%) showed more than 5000 parasites/µL blood. The sensitivity of the diagnosis by microscopy and OptiMAL decreased with lower parasitemia. All samples showing disagreement among the methods were reevaluated, but the first result was used for the calculations. Parasites were detected in the 6 false-negative samples by microscopy after the second examination. The mixed infection was only detected by PCR, while the other methods diagnosed it as P. falciparum (microscopy) or P. vivax (OptiMAL) infection. Most of the false results obtained with the OptiMAL strip were related to the P. falciparum-specific band, including 3 species misdiagnoses, which could be related to the test itself or to genetic variation of the Venezuelan strains. The use of the microscopic method for malaria detection is recommended for its low cost but is very difficult to implement in large scale, population-based studies; thus, we report here more efficient methods suitable for this purpose.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2007000400012MalariaMolecular diagnosis of malariaMicroscopic diagnosis of malariaPolymerase chain reactionOptiMAL
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H Rodulfo
M De Donato
R Mora
L González
C.E Contreras
spellingShingle H Rodulfo
M De Donato
R Mora
L González
C.E Contreras
Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of Venezuela
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Malaria
Molecular diagnosis of malaria
Microscopic diagnosis of malaria
Polymerase chain reaction
OptiMAL
author_facet H Rodulfo
M De Donato
R Mora
L González
C.E Contreras
author_sort H Rodulfo
title Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of Venezuela
title_short Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of Venezuela
title_full Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of Venezuela
title_fullStr Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of Venezuela
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and PCR in endemic areas of Venezuela
title_sort comparison of the diagnosis of malaria by microscopy, immunochromatography and pcr in endemic areas of venezuela
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
series Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
issn 0100-879X
1414-431X
publishDate 2007-04-01
description Whole blood samples (N = 295) were obtained from different locations in Amazonas and Sucre States, in Venezuela. Malaria was diagnosed by microscopy, OptiMAL™ and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), with Plasmodium vivax, P. falciparum, and P. malariae being detected when possible. We identified 93 infections, 66 of which were caused by P. vivax, 26 by P. falciparum, and 1 was a mixed infection. No infection caused by P. malariae was detected. The sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic method were high: 95.7 and 97.9% for microscopy, 87.0 and 97.9% for OptiMAL, and 98.0 and 100% for PCR, respectively. Most samples (72.2%) showed more than 5000 parasites/µL blood. The sensitivity of the diagnosis by microscopy and OptiMAL decreased with lower parasitemia. All samples showing disagreement among the methods were reevaluated, but the first result was used for the calculations. Parasites were detected in the 6 false-negative samples by microscopy after the second examination. The mixed infection was only detected by PCR, while the other methods diagnosed it as P. falciparum (microscopy) or P. vivax (OptiMAL) infection. Most of the false results obtained with the OptiMAL strip were related to the P. falciparum-specific band, including 3 species misdiagnoses, which could be related to the test itself or to genetic variation of the Venezuelan strains. The use of the microscopic method for malaria detection is recommended for its low cost but is very difficult to implement in large scale, population-based studies; thus, we report here more efficient methods suitable for this purpose.
topic Malaria
Molecular diagnosis of malaria
Microscopic diagnosis of malaria
Polymerase chain reaction
OptiMAL
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2007000400012
work_keys_str_mv AT hrodulfo comparisonofthediagnosisofmalariabymicroscopyimmunochromatographyandpcrinendemicareasofvenezuela
AT mdedonato comparisonofthediagnosisofmalariabymicroscopyimmunochromatographyandpcrinendemicareasofvenezuela
AT rmora comparisonofthediagnosisofmalariabymicroscopyimmunochromatographyandpcrinendemicareasofvenezuela
AT lgonzalez comparisonofthediagnosisofmalariabymicroscopyimmunochromatographyandpcrinendemicareasofvenezuela
AT cecontreras comparisonofthediagnosisofmalariabymicroscopyimmunochromatographyandpcrinendemicareasofvenezuela
_version_ 1725203263704268800