Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?

This paper seeks to outline a methodological approach that can be used in order to help understand such movements, and more fundamentally, the role of community in Social Innovation (SI). The article offers an overview of Participative Action Research (PAR), and outlines its strengths and weaknesses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gerald Taylor Aiken
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad del País Vasco 2017-06-01
Series:European Public & Social Innovation Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pub.sinnergiak.org/index.php/esir/article/view/53/20
id doaj-bd805db9ee8f4027ba7721e8ede1be92
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd805db9ee8f4027ba7721e8ede1be922020-11-25T02:46:28ZspaUniversidad del País VascoEuropean Public & Social Innovation Review2529-98242017-06-01211733doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.2Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?Gerald Taylor Aiken0Université du LuxembourgThis paper seeks to outline a methodological approach that can be used in order to help understand such movements, and more fundamentally, the role of community in Social Innovation (SI). The article offers an overview of Participative Action Research (PAR), and outlines its strengths and weaknesses in studying community-based social innovation, in this case the Transition movement. PAR is not an ‘off the shelf’ kit, or a ‘conforming of methodological standards’, but rather a series of approaches that ought to inform the research. The paper argues that these approaches, rather than techniques, are essential to get right if the intangible, granular, and incidental-but-fundamental aspects of community are to be grasped by researchers. Given the small-scale nature of community low carbon transitions a granular analysis is preferred to a more surface, superficial overview of such processes. Qualitative research is preferred to quantitative aggregation of initiatives, due to the need to understand the everyday, more phenomenological aspects of community, and the specific tacit relations and subjectivities enacted through their capacity to cut carbon.http://pub.sinnergiak.org/index.php/esir/article/view/53/20Low Carbon TransitionsCommunityTransition TownsParticipatoryAction Research
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerald Taylor Aiken
spellingShingle Gerald Taylor Aiken
Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?
European Public & Social Innovation Review
Low Carbon Transitions
Community
Transition Towns
Participatory
Action Research
author_facet Gerald Taylor Aiken
author_sort Gerald Taylor Aiken
title Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?
title_short Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?
title_full Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?
title_fullStr Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?
title_full_unstemmed Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?
title_sort social innovation and participatory action research: a way to research community?
publisher Universidad del País Vasco
series European Public & Social Innovation Review
issn 2529-9824
publishDate 2017-06-01
description This paper seeks to outline a methodological approach that can be used in order to help understand such movements, and more fundamentally, the role of community in Social Innovation (SI). The article offers an overview of Participative Action Research (PAR), and outlines its strengths and weaknesses in studying community-based social innovation, in this case the Transition movement. PAR is not an ‘off the shelf’ kit, or a ‘conforming of methodological standards’, but rather a series of approaches that ought to inform the research. The paper argues that these approaches, rather than techniques, are essential to get right if the intangible, granular, and incidental-but-fundamental aspects of community are to be grasped by researchers. Given the small-scale nature of community low carbon transitions a granular analysis is preferred to a more surface, superficial overview of such processes. Qualitative research is preferred to quantitative aggregation of initiatives, due to the need to understand the everyday, more phenomenological aspects of community, and the specific tacit relations and subjectivities enacted through their capacity to cut carbon.
topic Low Carbon Transitions
Community
Transition Towns
Participatory
Action Research
url http://pub.sinnergiak.org/index.php/esir/article/view/53/20
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldtayloraiken socialinnovationandparticipatoryactionresearchawaytoresearchcommunity
_version_ 1724758064671752192