Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?
This paper seeks to outline a methodological approach that can be used in order to help understand such movements, and more fundamentally, the role of community in Social Innovation (SI). The article offers an overview of Participative Action Research (PAR), and outlines its strengths and weaknesses...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad del País Vasco
2017-06-01
|
Series: | European Public & Social Innovation Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pub.sinnergiak.org/index.php/esir/article/view/53/20 |
id |
doaj-bd805db9ee8f4027ba7721e8ede1be92 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bd805db9ee8f4027ba7721e8ede1be922020-11-25T02:46:28ZspaUniversidad del País VascoEuropean Public & Social Innovation Review2529-98242017-06-01211733doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.2Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community?Gerald Taylor Aiken0Université du LuxembourgThis paper seeks to outline a methodological approach that can be used in order to help understand such movements, and more fundamentally, the role of community in Social Innovation (SI). The article offers an overview of Participative Action Research (PAR), and outlines its strengths and weaknesses in studying community-based social innovation, in this case the Transition movement. PAR is not an ‘off the shelf’ kit, or a ‘conforming of methodological standards’, but rather a series of approaches that ought to inform the research. The paper argues that these approaches, rather than techniques, are essential to get right if the intangible, granular, and incidental-but-fundamental aspects of community are to be grasped by researchers. Given the small-scale nature of community low carbon transitions a granular analysis is preferred to a more surface, superficial overview of such processes. Qualitative research is preferred to quantitative aggregation of initiatives, due to the need to understand the everyday, more phenomenological aspects of community, and the specific tacit relations and subjectivities enacted through their capacity to cut carbon.http://pub.sinnergiak.org/index.php/esir/article/view/53/20Low Carbon TransitionsCommunityTransition TownsParticipatoryAction Research |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gerald Taylor Aiken |
spellingShingle |
Gerald Taylor Aiken Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community? European Public & Social Innovation Review Low Carbon Transitions Community Transition Towns Participatory Action Research |
author_facet |
Gerald Taylor Aiken |
author_sort |
Gerald Taylor Aiken |
title |
Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community? |
title_short |
Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community? |
title_full |
Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community? |
title_fullStr |
Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Social Innovation and Participatory Action Research: A way to research community? |
title_sort |
social innovation and participatory action research: a way to research community? |
publisher |
Universidad del País Vasco |
series |
European Public & Social Innovation Review |
issn |
2529-9824 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
This paper seeks to outline a methodological approach that can be used in order to help understand such movements, and more fundamentally, the role of community in Social Innovation (SI). The article offers an overview of Participative Action Research (PAR), and outlines its strengths and weaknesses in studying community-based social innovation, in this case the Transition movement. PAR is not an ‘off the shelf’ kit, or a ‘conforming of methodological standards’, but rather a series of approaches that ought to inform the research. The paper argues that these approaches, rather than techniques, are essential to get right if the intangible, granular, and incidental-but-fundamental aspects of community are to be grasped by researchers. Given the small-scale nature of community low carbon transitions a granular analysis is preferred to a more surface, superficial overview of such processes. Qualitative research is preferred to quantitative aggregation of initiatives, due to the need to understand the everyday, more phenomenological aspects of community, and the specific tacit relations and subjectivities enacted through their capacity to cut carbon. |
topic |
Low Carbon Transitions Community Transition Towns Participatory Action Research |
url |
http://pub.sinnergiak.org/index.php/esir/article/view/53/20 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT geraldtayloraiken socialinnovationandparticipatoryactionresearchawaytoresearchcommunity |
_version_ |
1724758064671752192 |