On-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in Kings River Basin
Chronic groundwater overdraft threatens agricultural sustainability in California's Central Valley. Diverting flood flows onto farmland for groundwater recharge offers an opportunity to help address this challenge. We studied the infiltration rate of floodwater diverted from the Kings River at...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources
2016-11-01
|
Series: | California Agriculture |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.2016a0018 |
id |
doaj-bd78dac9a45c444d90020d0e1d59f745 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bd78dac9a45c444d90020d0e1d59f7452020-11-24T22:29:46ZengUniversity of California Agriculture and Natural ResourcesCalifornia Agriculture0008-08452160-80912016-11-01700420020710.3733/ca.2016a0018CAv070n04_8On-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in Kings River BasinPhilip A.M. Bachand0Sujoy B. Roy1Nicole Stern2Joseph Choperena3Don Cameron4William R. Horwath5P.A.M. Bachand is President and Principal Investigator/Engineer at Bachand & Associates, DavisS.B. Roy is Principal Engineer at Tetra Tech, Research and Development, LafayetteN. Stern is Environmental Scientist at Delta Stewardship Council, SacramentoJ. Choperena is Senior Project Manager at Sustainable Conservation, San FranciscoD. Cameron is General Manager at Terranova Ranch, HelmW.R. Horwath is Professor of Soil Biogeochemistry and J.G. Boswell Endowed Chair in Soil Science in the Department of Land, Air and Water Resources at UC DavisChronic groundwater overdraft threatens agricultural sustainability in California's Central Valley. Diverting flood flows onto farmland for groundwater recharge offers an opportunity to help address this challenge. We studied the infiltration rate of floodwater diverted from the Kings River at a turnout upstream of the James Weir onto adjoining cropland; and calculated how much land would be necessary to capture the available floodwater, how much recharge of groundwater might be achieved, and the costs. The 1,000-acre pilot study included fields growing tomatoes, wine grapes, alfalfa and pistachios. Flood flows diverted onto vineyards infiltrated at an average rate of 2.5 inches per day under sustained flooding. At that relatively high infiltration rate, 10 acres are needed to capture one CFS of diverted flood flow. We considered these findings in the context of regional expansion. Based upon a 30-year record of Kings Basin surplus flood flows, we estimate 30,000 acres operated for on-farm flood recharge would have had the capacity to capture 80% of available flood flows and potentially offset overdraft rates in the Kings Basin. Costs of on-farm flood capture for this study were estimated at $36 per acre-foot, less than the cost for surface water storage and dedicated recharge basins.http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.2016a0018Earth and Environmental SciencesFarms and Farming SystemsNatural ResourcesPlant Science and Plant ProductsResearchTechnology and Engineeringagricultural landagricultural managementagricultureengineeringenvironmentenvironmental programsenvironmental scienceirrigation and drainagenatural resource management |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Philip A.M. Bachand Sujoy B. Roy Nicole Stern Joseph Choperena Don Cameron William R. Horwath |
spellingShingle |
Philip A.M. Bachand Sujoy B. Roy Nicole Stern Joseph Choperena Don Cameron William R. Horwath On-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in Kings River Basin California Agriculture Earth and Environmental Sciences Farms and Farming Systems Natural Resources Plant Science and Plant Products Research Technology and Engineering agricultural land agricultural management agriculture engineering environment environmental programs environmental science irrigation and drainage natural resource management |
author_facet |
Philip A.M. Bachand Sujoy B. Roy Nicole Stern Joseph Choperena Don Cameron William R. Horwath |
author_sort |
Philip A.M. Bachand |
title |
On-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in Kings River Basin |
title_short |
On-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in Kings River Basin |
title_full |
On-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in Kings River Basin |
title_fullStr |
On-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in Kings River Basin |
title_full_unstemmed |
On-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in Kings River Basin |
title_sort |
on-farm flood capture could reduce groundwater overdraft in kings river basin |
publisher |
University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources |
series |
California Agriculture |
issn |
0008-0845 2160-8091 |
publishDate |
2016-11-01 |
description |
Chronic groundwater overdraft threatens agricultural sustainability in California's Central Valley. Diverting flood flows onto farmland for groundwater recharge offers an opportunity to help address this challenge. We studied the infiltration rate of floodwater diverted from the Kings River at a turnout upstream of the James Weir onto adjoining cropland; and calculated how much land would be necessary to capture the available floodwater, how much recharge of groundwater might be achieved, and the costs. The 1,000-acre pilot study included fields growing tomatoes, wine grapes, alfalfa and pistachios. Flood flows diverted onto vineyards infiltrated at an average rate of 2.5 inches per day under sustained flooding. At that relatively high infiltration rate, 10 acres are needed to capture one CFS of diverted flood flow. We considered these findings in the context of regional expansion. Based upon a 30-year record of Kings Basin surplus flood flows, we estimate 30,000 acres operated for on-farm flood recharge would have had the capacity to capture 80% of available flood flows and potentially offset overdraft rates in the Kings Basin. Costs of on-farm flood capture for this study were estimated at $36 per acre-foot, less than the cost for surface water storage and dedicated recharge basins. |
topic |
Earth and Environmental Sciences Farms and Farming Systems Natural Resources Plant Science and Plant Products Research Technology and Engineering agricultural land agricultural management agriculture engineering environment environmental programs environmental science irrigation and drainage natural resource management |
url |
http://calag.ucanr.edu/archive/?article=ca.2016a0018 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT philipambachand onfarmfloodcapturecouldreducegroundwateroverdraftinkingsriverbasin AT sujoybroy onfarmfloodcapturecouldreducegroundwateroverdraftinkingsriverbasin AT nicolestern onfarmfloodcapturecouldreducegroundwateroverdraftinkingsriverbasin AT josephchoperena onfarmfloodcapturecouldreducegroundwateroverdraftinkingsriverbasin AT doncameron onfarmfloodcapturecouldreducegroundwateroverdraftinkingsriverbasin AT williamrhorwath onfarmfloodcapturecouldreducegroundwateroverdraftinkingsriverbasin |
_version_ |
1725743357399924736 |