Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument
A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson'...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Windsor
2004-01-01
|
| Series: | Informal Logic |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2152 |
| id |
doaj-bd7557e2e6a44d57bbdeefe8af94f8da |
|---|---|
| record_format |
Article |
| spelling |
doaj-bd7557e2e6a44d57bbdeefe8af94f8da2020-11-25T02:07:51ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2004-01-0123110.22329/il.v23i1.2152Dialectics, Evaluation, and ArgumentMaurice A. FinocchiaroA critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson's argument for the strong conception, and argue that the moderate conception is correct.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2152argumentargumentationargument evaluationdialecticaldialecticsdefinitions of argument |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
English |
| format |
Article |
| sources |
DOAJ |
| author |
Maurice A. Finocchiaro |
| spellingShingle |
Maurice A. Finocchiaro Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument Informal Logic argument argumentation argument evaluation dialectical dialectics definitions of argument |
| author_facet |
Maurice A. Finocchiaro |
| author_sort |
Maurice A. Finocchiaro |
| title |
Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument |
| title_short |
Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument |
| title_full |
Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument |
| title_fullStr |
Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument |
| title_sort |
dialectics, evaluation, and argument |
| publisher |
University of Windsor |
| series |
Informal Logic |
| issn |
0824-2577 2293-734X |
| publishDate |
2004-01-01 |
| description |
A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson's argument for the strong conception, and argue that the moderate conception is correct. |
| topic |
argument argumentation argument evaluation dialectical dialectics definitions of argument |
| url |
https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2152 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT mauriceafinocchiaro dialecticsevaluationandargument |
| _version_ |
1724929237266202624 |