Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods

<p>Hydraulic fracture apertures predominantly control fluid transport in fractured rock masses. Hence, the objective of the current study is to investigate and compare three different laboratory-scale methods to determine hydraulic apertures in fractured (Fontainebleau and Flechtinger) sandsto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Cheng, S. Hale, H. Milsch, P. Blum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-12-01
Series:Solid Earth
Online Access:https://se.copernicus.org/articles/11/2411/2020/se-11-2411-2020.pdf
id doaj-bd6cf6a3b1f440c6926ee8467cde7075
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd6cf6a3b1f440c6926ee8467cde70752020-12-11T07:35:26ZengCopernicus PublicationsSolid Earth1869-95101869-95292020-12-01112411242310.5194/se-11-2411-2020Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methodsC. Cheng0C. Cheng1S. Hale2H. Milsch3P. Blum4Section 4.8 Geoenergy, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyInstitute for Geosciences, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam, GermanyInstitute for Applied Geosciences (AGW), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Adenauerring 20b, 76131 Karlsruhe, GermanySection 4.8 Geoenergy, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, GermanyInstitute for Applied Geosciences (AGW), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Adenauerring 20b, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany<p>Hydraulic fracture apertures predominantly control fluid transport in fractured rock masses. Hence, the objective of the current study is to investigate and compare three different laboratory-scale methods to determine hydraulic apertures in fractured (Fontainebleau and Flechtinger) sandstone samples with negligible matrix permeability. Direct measurements were performed by using a flow-through apparatus and a transient-airflow permeameter. In addition, a microscope camera permitted measuring the mechanical fracture apertures from which the corresponding hydraulic apertures were indirectly derived by applying various empirical correlations. Single fractures in the sample cores were generated artificially either by axial splitting or by a saw cut resulting in hydraulic apertures that ranged between 8 and 66&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m. Hydraulic apertures, accurately determined by the flow-through apparatus, are used to compare results obtained by the other methods. The transient-airflow permeameter delivers accurate values, particularly when repeated measurements along the full fracture width are performed. In this case, the derived mean hydraulic fracture apertures are in excellent quantitative agreement. When hydraulic apertures are calculated indirectly from optically determined mechanical apertures using empirical equations, they show larger variations that are difficult to compare with the flow-through-derived results. Variations in hydraulic apertures as observed between methods are almost certainly related to differences in sampled fracture volume. Overall, using direct flow-through measurements as a reference, this study demonstrates the applicability of portable methods to determine hydraulic fracture apertures at both the laboratory and outcrop scales.</p>https://se.copernicus.org/articles/11/2411/2020/se-11-2411-2020.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. Cheng
C. Cheng
S. Hale
H. Milsch
P. Blum
spellingShingle C. Cheng
C. Cheng
S. Hale
H. Milsch
P. Blum
Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods
Solid Earth
author_facet C. Cheng
C. Cheng
S. Hale
H. Milsch
P. Blum
author_sort C. Cheng
title Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods
title_short Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods
title_full Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods
title_fullStr Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods
title_full_unstemmed Measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods
title_sort measuring hydraulic fracture apertures: a comparison of methods
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Solid Earth
issn 1869-9510
1869-9529
publishDate 2020-12-01
description <p>Hydraulic fracture apertures predominantly control fluid transport in fractured rock masses. Hence, the objective of the current study is to investigate and compare three different laboratory-scale methods to determine hydraulic apertures in fractured (Fontainebleau and Flechtinger) sandstone samples with negligible matrix permeability. Direct measurements were performed by using a flow-through apparatus and a transient-airflow permeameter. In addition, a microscope camera permitted measuring the mechanical fracture apertures from which the corresponding hydraulic apertures were indirectly derived by applying various empirical correlations. Single fractures in the sample cores were generated artificially either by axial splitting or by a saw cut resulting in hydraulic apertures that ranged between 8 and 66&thinsp;<span class="inline-formula">µ</span>m. Hydraulic apertures, accurately determined by the flow-through apparatus, are used to compare results obtained by the other methods. The transient-airflow permeameter delivers accurate values, particularly when repeated measurements along the full fracture width are performed. In this case, the derived mean hydraulic fracture apertures are in excellent quantitative agreement. When hydraulic apertures are calculated indirectly from optically determined mechanical apertures using empirical equations, they show larger variations that are difficult to compare with the flow-through-derived results. Variations in hydraulic apertures as observed between methods are almost certainly related to differences in sampled fracture volume. Overall, using direct flow-through measurements as a reference, this study demonstrates the applicability of portable methods to determine hydraulic fracture apertures at both the laboratory and outcrop scales.</p>
url https://se.copernicus.org/articles/11/2411/2020/se-11-2411-2020.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ccheng measuringhydraulicfractureaperturesacomparisonofmethods
AT ccheng measuringhydraulicfractureaperturesacomparisonofmethods
AT shale measuringhydraulicfractureaperturesacomparisonofmethods
AT hmilsch measuringhydraulicfractureaperturesacomparisonofmethods
AT pblum measuringhydraulicfractureaperturesacomparisonofmethods
_version_ 1724386713669730304