Exploring Past Myths through Giambattista Vico and Jyotiba Phule

Abstract In this article, I examine the writings of the 18th-century Italian thinker Giambattista Vico and the 19th-century Indian thinker/social reformer Jyotiba Phule about myths, temporality, and the past. Both these thinkers turned to historicising myths in order to engage with debates in the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aparna Devare
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
Series:Contexto Internacional
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000300763&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-bd6a6ab8894e4d148e84bc2b667add3a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd6a6ab8894e4d148e84bc2b667add3a2020-11-24T22:31:22ZspaPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de JaneiroContexto Internacional1982-024038376378110.1590/s0102-8529.2016380300002S0102-85292016000300763Exploring Past Myths through Giambattista Vico and Jyotiba PhuleAparna DevareAbstract In this article, I examine the writings of the 18th-century Italian thinker Giambattista Vico and the 19th-century Indian thinker/social reformer Jyotiba Phule about myths, temporality, and the past. Both these thinkers turned to historicising myths in order to engage with debates in the present. Both viewed myths as reflecting social relations of power and domination, and sought to understand their material realities, emphasising human agency, collective change, and the social construction of language and practices. Both pointed to the limits of history, albeit in different ways: Vico by introducing the notion of providence, and Phule by rewriting the myths he had rationalised, using the same mythological figures, in order to intervene in the politics of the present from a marginal perspective (that of being low-caste). I juxtapose these two disparate thinkers in terms of their similarities in historicising myths, and analyse why Phule goes further than Vico in exceeding the boundaries of history. I argue that Phule’s cultural context allowed him to return to myths more easily than Vico, although the latter revered them as well.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000300763&lng=en&tlng=enVicoPhuleMythsHinduismHistory
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aparna Devare
spellingShingle Aparna Devare
Exploring Past Myths through Giambattista Vico and Jyotiba Phule
Contexto Internacional
Vico
Phule
Myths
Hinduism
History
author_facet Aparna Devare
author_sort Aparna Devare
title Exploring Past Myths through Giambattista Vico and Jyotiba Phule
title_short Exploring Past Myths through Giambattista Vico and Jyotiba Phule
title_full Exploring Past Myths through Giambattista Vico and Jyotiba Phule
title_fullStr Exploring Past Myths through Giambattista Vico and Jyotiba Phule
title_full_unstemmed Exploring Past Myths through Giambattista Vico and Jyotiba Phule
title_sort exploring past myths through giambattista vico and jyotiba phule
publisher Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro
series Contexto Internacional
issn 1982-0240
description Abstract In this article, I examine the writings of the 18th-century Italian thinker Giambattista Vico and the 19th-century Indian thinker/social reformer Jyotiba Phule about myths, temporality, and the past. Both these thinkers turned to historicising myths in order to engage with debates in the present. Both viewed myths as reflecting social relations of power and domination, and sought to understand their material realities, emphasising human agency, collective change, and the social construction of language and practices. Both pointed to the limits of history, albeit in different ways: Vico by introducing the notion of providence, and Phule by rewriting the myths he had rationalised, using the same mythological figures, in order to intervene in the politics of the present from a marginal perspective (that of being low-caste). I juxtapose these two disparate thinkers in terms of their similarities in historicising myths, and analyse why Phule goes further than Vico in exceeding the boundaries of history. I argue that Phule’s cultural context allowed him to return to myths more easily than Vico, although the latter revered them as well.
topic Vico
Phule
Myths
Hinduism
History
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-85292016000300763&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT aparnadevare exploringpastmythsthroughgiambattistavicoandjyotibaphule
_version_ 1725737480814067712