Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements

Abstract Adaptation of movements involving the proximal and distal upper-limb can be differentially facilitated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) over the cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1). Here, we build on this evidence by demonstrating that cathodal TDCS impairs moto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthew Weightman, John-Stuart Brittain, R. Chris Miall, Ned Jenkinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83656-5
id doaj-bd67af4ecf1542d69675018489d66031
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd67af4ecf1542d69675018489d660312021-03-11T12:18:42ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-83656-5Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movementsMatthew Weightman0John-Stuart Brittain1R. Chris Miall2Ned Jenkinson3School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of BirminghamSchool of Psychology, University of BirminghamSchool of Psychology, University of BirminghamSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of BirminghamAbstract Adaptation of movements involving the proximal and distal upper-limb can be differentially facilitated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) over the cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1). Here, we build on this evidence by demonstrating that cathodal TDCS impairs motor adaptation with a differentiation of the proximal and distal upper-limbs, relative to the site of stimulation. Healthy young adults received M1 or cerebellar cathodal TDCS while making fast ‘shooting’ movements towards targets under 60° rotated visual feedback conditions, using either whole-arm reaching or fine hand and finger movements. As predicted, we found that cathodal cerebellar TDCS resulted in impairment of adaptation of movements with the whole arm compared to M1 and sham groups, which proved significantly different during late adaptation. However, cathodal cerebellar TDCS also significantly enhanced adaptation of hand movements, which may reflect changes in the excitability of the pathway between the cerebellum and M1. We found no evidence for change of adaptation rates using arm or finger movements following cathodal TDCS directly over M1. These results are further evidence to support movement specific effects of TDCS, and highlight how the connectivity and functional organisation of the cerebellum and M1 must be considered when designing TDCS-based therapies.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83656-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew Weightman
John-Stuart Brittain
R. Chris Miall
Ned Jenkinson
spellingShingle Matthew Weightman
John-Stuart Brittain
R. Chris Miall
Ned Jenkinson
Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements
Scientific Reports
author_facet Matthew Weightman
John-Stuart Brittain
R. Chris Miall
Ned Jenkinson
author_sort Matthew Weightman
title Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements
title_short Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements
title_full Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements
title_fullStr Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements
title_full_unstemmed Direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar TDCS on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements
title_sort direct and indirect effects of cathodal cerebellar tdcs on visuomotor adaptation of hand and arm movements
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Adaptation of movements involving the proximal and distal upper-limb can be differentially facilitated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) over the cerebellum and primary motor cortex (M1). Here, we build on this evidence by demonstrating that cathodal TDCS impairs motor adaptation with a differentiation of the proximal and distal upper-limbs, relative to the site of stimulation. Healthy young adults received M1 or cerebellar cathodal TDCS while making fast ‘shooting’ movements towards targets under 60° rotated visual feedback conditions, using either whole-arm reaching or fine hand and finger movements. As predicted, we found that cathodal cerebellar TDCS resulted in impairment of adaptation of movements with the whole arm compared to M1 and sham groups, which proved significantly different during late adaptation. However, cathodal cerebellar TDCS also significantly enhanced adaptation of hand movements, which may reflect changes in the excitability of the pathway between the cerebellum and M1. We found no evidence for change of adaptation rates using arm or finger movements following cathodal TDCS directly over M1. These results are further evidence to support movement specific effects of TDCS, and highlight how the connectivity and functional organisation of the cerebellum and M1 must be considered when designing TDCS-based therapies.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83656-5
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewweightman directandindirecteffectsofcathodalcerebellartdcsonvisuomotoradaptationofhandandarmmovements
AT johnstuartbrittain directandindirecteffectsofcathodalcerebellartdcsonvisuomotoradaptationofhandandarmmovements
AT rchrismiall directandindirecteffectsofcathodalcerebellartdcsonvisuomotoradaptationofhandandarmmovements
AT nedjenkinson directandindirecteffectsofcathodalcerebellartdcsonvisuomotoradaptationofhandandarmmovements
_version_ 1724224507063828480