'C'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' Obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567)
‘C’estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.’ Blocking a peace initiative (1566-1567) After the Compromise of the Nobles and a spurt of iconoclasm in 1566, a general pardon — a collective amnesty — was repeatedly proposed as a strategy to pacify the Low Countries and reaffirm royal powe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Journals
2004-01-01
|
Series: | BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4510 |
id |
doaj-bd60b5bbb5ba46a990834d0723787aa8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bd60b5bbb5ba46a990834d0723787aa82021-10-02T15:17:00ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982004-01-011193'C'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' Obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567)V. Soen ‘C’estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.’ Blocking a peace initiative (1566-1567) After the Compromise of the Nobles and a spurt of iconoclasm in 1566, a general pardon — a collective amnesty — was repeatedly proposed as a strategy to pacify the Low Countries and reaffirm royal power. This article describes how and why the suggestion to issue a general pardon provoked policymakers in Brussels and Madrid to place major obstacles in its path, even though the collective amnesty was in fact drawn up as a salutary measure. Alternate reactions from key players such as Philip II, Margarita de Parma, the Duke of Alba and Cardinal Granvelle actually corresponded to well-defined patterns and conceptions of issuing a pardon. https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4510Politics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
V. Soen |
spellingShingle |
V. Soen 'C'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' Obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567) BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review Politics |
author_facet |
V. Soen |
author_sort |
V. Soen |
title |
'C'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' Obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567) |
title_short |
'C'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' Obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567) |
title_full |
'C'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' Obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567) |
title_fullStr |
'C'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' Obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567) |
title_full_unstemmed |
'C'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' Obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567) |
title_sort |
'c'estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.' obstructie bij een pacificatiemaatregel (1566-1567) |
publisher |
Open Journals |
series |
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review |
issn |
0165-0505 2211-2898 |
publishDate |
2004-01-01 |
description |
‘C’estoit comme songe et mocquerie de parler de pardon.’ Blocking a peace initiative (1566-1567)
After the Compromise of the Nobles and a spurt of iconoclasm in 1566, a general pardon — a collective amnesty — was repeatedly proposed as a strategy to pacify the Low Countries and reaffirm royal power. This article describes how and why the suggestion to issue a general pardon provoked policymakers in Brussels and Madrid to place major obstacles in its path, even though the collective amnesty was in fact drawn up as a salutary measure. Alternate reactions from key players such as Philip II, Margarita de Parma, the Duke of Alba and Cardinal Granvelle actually corresponded to well-defined patterns and conceptions of issuing a pardon.
|
topic |
Politics |
url |
https://ojstest.minions.amsterdam/article/view/4510 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT vsoen cestoitcommesongeetmocqueriedeparlerdepardonobstructiebijeenpacificatiemaatregel15661567 |
_version_ |
1716854294111584256 |