Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Much of the public access cancer microarray data is asymmetric, belonging to datasets containing no samples from normal tissue. Asymmetric data cannot be used in standard meta-analysis approaches (such as the inverse variance method)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tozeren Aydin, Dawany Noor B
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-09-01
Series:BMC Bioinformatics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/483
id doaj-bd422b1a338b40f8afdc9be1c3ee4724
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd422b1a338b40f8afdc9be1c3ee47242020-11-25T00:38:53ZengBMCBMC Bioinformatics1471-21052010-09-0111148310.1186/1471-2105-11-483Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer typesTozeren AydinDawany Noor B<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Much of the public access cancer microarray data is asymmetric, belonging to datasets containing no samples from normal tissue. Asymmetric data cannot be used in standard meta-analysis approaches (such as the inverse variance method) to obtain large sample sizes for statistical power enrichment. Noting that plenty of normal tissue microarray samples exist in studies not involving cancer, we investigated the viability and accuracy of an integrated microarray analysis approach based on significance analysis of microarrays (merged SAM) using a collection of data from separate diseased and normal samples.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We focused on five solid cancer types (colon, kidney, liver, lung, and pancreas), where available microarray data allowed us to compare meta-analysis and integrated approaches. Our results from the merged SAM significantly overlapped gene lists from the validated inverse-variance method. Both meta-analysis and merged SAM approaches successfully captured the aberrances in the cell cycle that commonly occur in the different cancer types. However, the integrated SAM analysis replicated the known cancer literature (excluding microarray studies) with much more accuracy than the meta-analysis.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The merged SAM test is a powerful, robust approach for combining data from similar platforms and for analyzing asymmetric datasets, including those with only normal or only cancer samples that cannot be utilized by meta-analysis methods. The integrated SAM approach can also be used in comparing global gene expression between various subtypes of cancer arising from the same tissue.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/483
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tozeren Aydin
Dawany Noor B
spellingShingle Tozeren Aydin
Dawany Noor B
Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types
BMC Bioinformatics
author_facet Tozeren Aydin
Dawany Noor B
author_sort Tozeren Aydin
title Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types
title_short Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types
title_full Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types
title_fullStr Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types
title_full_unstemmed Asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types
title_sort asymmetric microarray data produces gene lists highly predictive of research literature on multiple cancer types
publisher BMC
series BMC Bioinformatics
issn 1471-2105
publishDate 2010-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Much of the public access cancer microarray data is asymmetric, belonging to datasets containing no samples from normal tissue. Asymmetric data cannot be used in standard meta-analysis approaches (such as the inverse variance method) to obtain large sample sizes for statistical power enrichment. Noting that plenty of normal tissue microarray samples exist in studies not involving cancer, we investigated the viability and accuracy of an integrated microarray analysis approach based on significance analysis of microarrays (merged SAM) using a collection of data from separate diseased and normal samples.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We focused on five solid cancer types (colon, kidney, liver, lung, and pancreas), where available microarray data allowed us to compare meta-analysis and integrated approaches. Our results from the merged SAM significantly overlapped gene lists from the validated inverse-variance method. Both meta-analysis and merged SAM approaches successfully captured the aberrances in the cell cycle that commonly occur in the different cancer types. However, the integrated SAM analysis replicated the known cancer literature (excluding microarray studies) with much more accuracy than the meta-analysis.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The merged SAM test is a powerful, robust approach for combining data from similar platforms and for analyzing asymmetric datasets, including those with only normal or only cancer samples that cannot be utilized by meta-analysis methods. The integrated SAM approach can also be used in comparing global gene expression between various subtypes of cancer arising from the same tissue.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/483
work_keys_str_mv AT tozerenaydin asymmetricmicroarraydataproducesgenelistshighlypredictiveofresearchliteratureonmultiplecancertypes
AT dawanynoorb asymmetricmicroarraydataproducesgenelistshighlypredictiveofresearchliteratureonmultiplecancertypes
_version_ 1725295962442694656