Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
Introduction Despite the continuous improvement in modern medical treatment, stroke is still a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. How to effectively improve the survival rate and reduce disability in patients who had a stroke has become the focus of many investigations. Recent findings...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021-06-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043585.full |
id |
doaj-bd3eb92149bc4ca28533e2a81f8237fe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bd3eb92149bc4ca28533e2a81f8237fe2021-09-30T03:00:05ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-06-0111510.1136/bmjopen-2020-043585Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysisBin Huang0Hong Zhang1Lihong Wen2Xiaoyun Zhang3Rong Tu4Kunzhen Wan5General Practice Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaIntroduction Despite the continuous improvement in modern medical treatment, stroke is still a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. How to effectively improve the survival rate and reduce disability in patients who had a stroke has become the focus of many investigations. Recent findings concerning the benefits of glibenclamide as a neuroprotective drug have initiated a new area for prospective studies on the effects of sulfonylureas. Given the high mortality and disability associated with stroke, it is essential to weigh the benefits of neuroprotective drugs against their safety. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to conduct a systematic review using meta-analysis to assess the benefits and safety of glibenclamide as a neuroprotective drug.Methods and analysis This study will analyse randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies published up to 31 December 2020 and include direct or indirect evidence. Studies will be retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Databases. The outcomes of this study will be mortality, scores from the Modified Rankin Scale and the occurrence of hypoglycaemic events. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment instrument for RCTs. A random-effect/fixed-effect model will be used to summarise the estimates of the mean difference/risk ratio using a 95% CI.Ethics and dissemination This meta-analysis is a secondary research project, which is based on previously published data. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this meta-analysis. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020144674.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043585.full |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bin Huang Hong Zhang Lihong Wen Xiaoyun Zhang Rong Tu Kunzhen Wan |
spellingShingle |
Bin Huang Hong Zhang Lihong Wen Xiaoyun Zhang Rong Tu Kunzhen Wan Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis BMJ Open |
author_facet |
Bin Huang Hong Zhang Lihong Wen Xiaoyun Zhang Rong Tu Kunzhen Wan |
author_sort |
Bin Huang |
title |
Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short |
Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
publisher |
BMJ Publishing Group |
series |
BMJ Open |
issn |
2044-6055 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Introduction Despite the continuous improvement in modern medical treatment, stroke is still a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. How to effectively improve the survival rate and reduce disability in patients who had a stroke has become the focus of many investigations. Recent findings concerning the benefits of glibenclamide as a neuroprotective drug have initiated a new area for prospective studies on the effects of sulfonylureas. Given the high mortality and disability associated with stroke, it is essential to weigh the benefits of neuroprotective drugs against their safety. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to conduct a systematic review using meta-analysis to assess the benefits and safety of glibenclamide as a neuroprotective drug.Methods and analysis This study will analyse randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies published up to 31 December 2020 and include direct or indirect evidence. Studies will be retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Databases. The outcomes of this study will be mortality, scores from the Modified Rankin Scale and the occurrence of hypoglycaemic events. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment instrument for RCTs. A random-effect/fixed-effect model will be used to summarise the estimates of the mean difference/risk ratio using a 95% CI.Ethics and dissemination This meta-analysis is a secondary research project, which is based on previously published data. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this meta-analysis. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020144674. |
url |
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043585.full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT binhuang effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hongzhang effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lihongwen effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiaoyunzhang effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rongtu effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kunzhenwan effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |
_version_ |
1716863963990327296 |