Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction Despite the continuous improvement in modern medical treatment, stroke is still a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. How to effectively improve the survival rate and reduce disability in patients who had a stroke has become the focus of many investigations. Recent findings...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bin Huang, Hong Zhang, Lihong Wen, Xiaoyun Zhang, Rong Tu, Kunzhen Wan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043585.full
id doaj-bd3eb92149bc4ca28533e2a81f8237fe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd3eb92149bc4ca28533e2a81f8237fe2021-09-30T03:00:05ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-06-0111510.1136/bmjopen-2020-043585Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysisBin Huang0Hong Zhang1Lihong Wen2Xiaoyun Zhang3Rong Tu4Kunzhen Wan5General Practice Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaEmergency Department, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Affiliated Hospital, Chengdu, ChinaIntroduction Despite the continuous improvement in modern medical treatment, stroke is still a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. How to effectively improve the survival rate and reduce disability in patients who had a stroke has become the focus of many investigations. Recent findings concerning the benefits of glibenclamide as a neuroprotective drug have initiated a new area for prospective studies on the effects of sulfonylureas. Given the high mortality and disability associated with stroke, it is essential to weigh the benefits of neuroprotective drugs against their safety. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to conduct a systematic review using meta-analysis to assess the benefits and safety of glibenclamide as a neuroprotective drug.Methods and analysis This study will analyse randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies published up to 31 December 2020 and include direct or indirect evidence. Studies will be retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Databases. The outcomes of this study will be mortality, scores from the Modified Rankin Scale and the occurrence of hypoglycaemic events. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment instrument for RCTs. A random-effect/fixed-effect model will be used to summarise the estimates of the mean difference/risk ratio using a 95% CI.Ethics and dissemination This meta-analysis is a secondary research project, which is based on previously published data. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this meta-analysis. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020144674.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043585.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bin Huang
Hong Zhang
Lihong Wen
Xiaoyun Zhang
Rong Tu
Kunzhen Wan
spellingShingle Bin Huang
Hong Zhang
Lihong Wen
Xiaoyun Zhang
Rong Tu
Kunzhen Wan
Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ Open
author_facet Bin Huang
Hong Zhang
Lihong Wen
Xiaoyun Zhang
Rong Tu
Kunzhen Wan
author_sort Bin Huang
title Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness and safety of glibenclamide for stroke: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Introduction Despite the continuous improvement in modern medical treatment, stroke is still a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. How to effectively improve the survival rate and reduce disability in patients who had a stroke has become the focus of many investigations. Recent findings concerning the benefits of glibenclamide as a neuroprotective drug have initiated a new area for prospective studies on the effects of sulfonylureas. Given the high mortality and disability associated with stroke, it is essential to weigh the benefits of neuroprotective drugs against their safety. Therefore, the objective of the current study is to conduct a systematic review using meta-analysis to assess the benefits and safety of glibenclamide as a neuroprotective drug.Methods and analysis This study will analyse randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies published up to 31 December 2020 and include direct or indirect evidence. Studies will be retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and WanFang Databases. The outcomes of this study will be mortality, scores from the Modified Rankin Scale and the occurrence of hypoglycaemic events. The risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment instrument for RCTs. A random-effect/fixed-effect model will be used to summarise the estimates of the mean difference/risk ratio using a 95% CI.Ethics and dissemination This meta-analysis is a secondary research project, which is based on previously published data. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required for this meta-analysis. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020144674.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/5/e043585.full
work_keys_str_mv AT binhuang effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hongzhang effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lihongwen effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiaoyunzhang effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rongtu effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kunzhenwan effectivenessandsafetyofglibenclamideforstrokeprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1716863963990327296