Sensitivity tests for an ensemble Kalman filter for aerosol assimilation

We present sensitivity tests for a global aerosol assimilation system utilizing AERONET observations of AOT (aerosol optical thickness) and AAE (aerosol Ångström exponent). The assimilation system employs an ensemble Kalman filter which requires tuning of three numerical parameters: ensemble size &a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. A. J. Schutgens, T. Miyoshi, T. Takemura, T. Nakajima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2010-07-01
Series:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Online Access:http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/6583/2010/acp-10-6583-2010.pdf
id doaj-bd32aeda879e4f8fb62f1c812f84f46f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd32aeda879e4f8fb62f1c812f84f46f2020-11-24T23:12:05ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242010-07-0110146583660010.5194/acp-10-6583-2010Sensitivity tests for an ensemble Kalman filter for aerosol assimilationN. A. J. SchutgensT. MiyoshiT. TakemuraT. NakajimaWe present sensitivity tests for a global aerosol assimilation system utilizing AERONET observations of AOT (aerosol optical thickness) and AAE (aerosol Ångström exponent). The assimilation system employs an ensemble Kalman filter which requires tuning of three numerical parameters: ensemble size <i>n</i><sub>ens</sub>, local patch size <i>n</i><sub>patch</sub> and inflation factor ρ. In addition, experiments are performed to test the impact of various implementations of the system. For instance, we use a different prescription of the emission ensemble or a different combination of observations. <br><br> The various experiments are compared against one-another and against independent AERONET and MODIS/Aqua observations. The assimilation leads to significant improvements in modelled AOT and AAE fields. Moreover remaining errors are mostly random while they are mostly systematic for an experiment without assimilation. In addition, these results do not depend much on our parameter or design choices. <br><br> It appears that the value of the local patch size has by far the biggest impact on the assimilation, which has sufficiently converged for an ensemble size of <i>n</i><sub>ens</sub>=20. Assimilating AOT and AAE is clearly preferential to assimilating AOT at two different wavelengths. In contrast, initial conditions or a description of aerosol beyond two modes (coarse and fine) have only little effect. <br><br> We also discuss the use of the ensemble spread as an error estimate of the analysed AOT and AAE fields. We show that a very common prescription of the emission ensemble (independent random modification in each grid cell) can have trouble generating sufficient spread in the forecast ensemble. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/6583/2010/acp-10-6583-2010.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. A. J. Schutgens
T. Miyoshi
T. Takemura
T. Nakajima
spellingShingle N. A. J. Schutgens
T. Miyoshi
T. Takemura
T. Nakajima
Sensitivity tests for an ensemble Kalman filter for aerosol assimilation
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
author_facet N. A. J. Schutgens
T. Miyoshi
T. Takemura
T. Nakajima
author_sort N. A. J. Schutgens
title Sensitivity tests for an ensemble Kalman filter for aerosol assimilation
title_short Sensitivity tests for an ensemble Kalman filter for aerosol assimilation
title_full Sensitivity tests for an ensemble Kalman filter for aerosol assimilation
title_fullStr Sensitivity tests for an ensemble Kalman filter for aerosol assimilation
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity tests for an ensemble Kalman filter for aerosol assimilation
title_sort sensitivity tests for an ensemble kalman filter for aerosol assimilation
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
issn 1680-7316
1680-7324
publishDate 2010-07-01
description We present sensitivity tests for a global aerosol assimilation system utilizing AERONET observations of AOT (aerosol optical thickness) and AAE (aerosol Ångström exponent). The assimilation system employs an ensemble Kalman filter which requires tuning of three numerical parameters: ensemble size <i>n</i><sub>ens</sub>, local patch size <i>n</i><sub>patch</sub> and inflation factor ρ. In addition, experiments are performed to test the impact of various implementations of the system. For instance, we use a different prescription of the emission ensemble or a different combination of observations. <br><br> The various experiments are compared against one-another and against independent AERONET and MODIS/Aqua observations. The assimilation leads to significant improvements in modelled AOT and AAE fields. Moreover remaining errors are mostly random while they are mostly systematic for an experiment without assimilation. In addition, these results do not depend much on our parameter or design choices. <br><br> It appears that the value of the local patch size has by far the biggest impact on the assimilation, which has sufficiently converged for an ensemble size of <i>n</i><sub>ens</sub>=20. Assimilating AOT and AAE is clearly preferential to assimilating AOT at two different wavelengths. In contrast, initial conditions or a description of aerosol beyond two modes (coarse and fine) have only little effect. <br><br> We also discuss the use of the ensemble spread as an error estimate of the analysed AOT and AAE fields. We show that a very common prescription of the emission ensemble (independent random modification in each grid cell) can have trouble generating sufficient spread in the forecast ensemble.
url http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/6583/2010/acp-10-6583-2010.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT najschutgens sensitivitytestsforanensemblekalmanfilterforaerosolassimilation
AT tmiyoshi sensitivitytestsforanensemblekalmanfilterforaerosolassimilation
AT ttakemura sensitivitytestsforanensemblekalmanfilterforaerosolassimilation
AT tnakajima sensitivitytestsforanensemblekalmanfilterforaerosolassimilation
_version_ 1725602493256171520