UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series

Background The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. Objective To see whet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elizabeth Wager
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-07-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
UK
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/7292.pdf
id doaj-bd1e990b191b4c909e3a88ecafb775d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd1e990b191b4c909e3a88ecafb775d12020-11-25T01:08:08ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592019-07-017e729210.7717/peerj.7292UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-seriesElizabeth Wager0Sideview, Princes Risborough, United KingdomBackground The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. Objective To see whether contact information for a staff member responsible for RI was readily available from UK university websites and to see how many universities published annual RI statements. Methods UK university websites were searched in mid-2012, mid-2014 and mid-2018. The availability of contact details for RI inquiries, other information about RI and, specifically, an annual RI statement, was recorded. Results The proportion of UK universities publishing an email address for RI inquiries rose from 23% in 2012 (31/134) to 55% in 2018. The same proportion (55%) published at least one annual RI statement in 2018, but only three provided statements for all years from 2012/13. There was great variation in the titles used for the staff member with responsibility for RI which made searching difficult. Conclusion Over 6 years after the publication of the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, nearly half of UK universities are not complying with all its recommendations and do not provide contact details for a staff member with responsibility for RI or an annual statement.https://peerj.com/articles/7292.pdfResearch integrityMisconductUniversitiesUK
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth Wager
spellingShingle Elizabeth Wager
UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
PeerJ
Research integrity
Misconduct
Universities
UK
author_facet Elizabeth Wager
author_sort Elizabeth Wager
title UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_short UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_full UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_fullStr UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_full_unstemmed UK universities compliance with the Concordat to Support Research Integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
title_sort uk universities compliance with the concordat to support research integrity: findings from cross-sectional time-series
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Background The Concordat to Support Research Integrity published in 2012 recommends that UK research institutions should provide a named point of contact to receive concerns about research integrity (RI). The Concordat also requires institutions to publish annual RI statements. Objective To see whether contact information for a staff member responsible for RI was readily available from UK university websites and to see how many universities published annual RI statements. Methods UK university websites were searched in mid-2012, mid-2014 and mid-2018. The availability of contact details for RI inquiries, other information about RI and, specifically, an annual RI statement, was recorded. Results The proportion of UK universities publishing an email address for RI inquiries rose from 23% in 2012 (31/134) to 55% in 2018. The same proportion (55%) published at least one annual RI statement in 2018, but only three provided statements for all years from 2012/13. There was great variation in the titles used for the staff member with responsibility for RI which made searching difficult. Conclusion Over 6 years after the publication of the Concordat to Support Research Integrity, nearly half of UK universities are not complying with all its recommendations and do not provide contact details for a staff member with responsibility for RI or an annual statement.
topic Research integrity
Misconduct
Universities
UK
url https://peerj.com/articles/7292.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethwager ukuniversitiescompliancewiththeconcordattosupportresearchintegrityfindingsfromcrosssectionaltimeseries
_version_ 1725184065266515968