Zur morphembezogenen Überformung der deutschen Orthographie

Morphematic reorientation of German orthography takes place in conformity with a general law in the history of writing. Alphabetic writing systems, being necessarily phonographic, tend to develop towards the encoding of non-phonetic units. The emergence of morphematic elements in German is preceeded...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nikolaus Ruge
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2005-10-01
Series:Linguistik Online
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1421
id doaj-bd075d3f07784187865f8f8f79238bb2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd075d3f07784187865f8f8f79238bb22021-09-13T12:57:00ZdeuBern Open PublishingLinguistik Online1615-30142005-10-0125410.13092/lo.25.1078Zur morphembezogenen Überformung der deutschen OrthographieNikolaus RugeMorphematic reorientation of German orthography takes place in conformity with a general law in the history of writing. Alphabetic writing systems, being necessarily phonographic, tend to develop towards the encoding of non-phonetic units. The emergence of morphematic elements in German is preceeded by the evolution of word-separation by regular spaces which had been adopted throughout Europe by the end of the 13th century. Based on a corpus containing 157 High German texts (late 15th to late 18th centuries), this paper will demonstrate that morphematic reorientation of German orthography can be explained neither as an invisible-hand-process nor as the outcome of prescriptive grammar, but as the result of interaction between orthograpic norm and usage. Three cases will be considered in detail: (1) Graphic assimilation of allomorphic plosive variation emerges as early as the 12th century, reflecting regional final devoicing. By the early 17th century, the rule governing orthographic reprensentation of final devoicing in present-day German is fully adopted in usage. Its morphematic reinterpretation does not follow before the end of the 17th century. (2) Morphematic graphic representation of [a]-Umlaut emerges during the 14th century in Upper Germany as a phonetic reflex of open [e]. It is recommended by Middle German grammarians since the 1560s, with explicit mention of morphological factors. Around 1700 the writing rule imposes itself in usage. (3) The use of double consonant letters occuring in final positions of 'graphic' syllables ( according to ) rests inhibited until the 18th century, in particular to prevent tri- or tessaragraphs (, ). It is the influence of Adelung's grammar which leads to the final adaption of the present-day rule.https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1421
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikolaus Ruge
spellingShingle Nikolaus Ruge
Zur morphembezogenen Überformung der deutschen Orthographie
Linguistik Online
author_facet Nikolaus Ruge
author_sort Nikolaus Ruge
title Zur morphembezogenen Überformung der deutschen Orthographie
title_short Zur morphembezogenen Überformung der deutschen Orthographie
title_full Zur morphembezogenen Überformung der deutschen Orthographie
title_fullStr Zur morphembezogenen Überformung der deutschen Orthographie
title_full_unstemmed Zur morphembezogenen Überformung der deutschen Orthographie
title_sort zur morphembezogenen überformung der deutschen orthographie
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Linguistik Online
issn 1615-3014
publishDate 2005-10-01
description Morphematic reorientation of German orthography takes place in conformity with a general law in the history of writing. Alphabetic writing systems, being necessarily phonographic, tend to develop towards the encoding of non-phonetic units. The emergence of morphematic elements in German is preceeded by the evolution of word-separation by regular spaces which had been adopted throughout Europe by the end of the 13th century. Based on a corpus containing 157 High German texts (late 15th to late 18th centuries), this paper will demonstrate that morphematic reorientation of German orthography can be explained neither as an invisible-hand-process nor as the outcome of prescriptive grammar, but as the result of interaction between orthograpic norm and usage. Three cases will be considered in detail: (1) Graphic assimilation of allomorphic plosive variation emerges as early as the 12th century, reflecting regional final devoicing. By the early 17th century, the rule governing orthographic reprensentation of final devoicing in present-day German is fully adopted in usage. Its morphematic reinterpretation does not follow before the end of the 17th century. (2) Morphematic graphic representation of [a]-Umlaut emerges during the 14th century in Upper Germany as a phonetic reflex of open [e]. It is recommended by Middle German grammarians since the 1560s, with explicit mention of morphological factors. Around 1700 the writing rule imposes itself in usage. (3) The use of double consonant letters occuring in final positions of 'graphic' syllables ( according to ) rests inhibited until the 18th century, in particular to prevent tri- or tessaragraphs (, ). It is the influence of Adelung's grammar which leads to the final adaption of the present-day rule.
url https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1421
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolausruge zurmorphembezogenenuberformungderdeutschenorthographie
_version_ 1717380706420654080