Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study

ObjectiveTo study the psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire short version.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingThree Georgian hospitals.ParticipantsPersonnel of participating hospitals (n=305 responses, estimated response rate 30%).InterventionsNone.Prim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole Ernstmann, Tanja Manser, Nikoloz Gambashidze, Antje Hammer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/2/e034863.full
id doaj-bd036d3710c04845b0ea3be1f6f8a90c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bd036d3710c04845b0ea3be1f6f8a90c2021-07-31T15:31:37ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552020-02-0110210.1136/bmjopen-2019-034863Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional studyNicole Ernstmann0Tanja Manser1Nikoloz Gambashidze2Antje Hammer31 Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany 4 School of Applied Psychology, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland, Olten, Switzerland 1 Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany 1 Institute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany ObjectiveTo study the psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire short version.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingThree Georgian hospitals.ParticipantsPersonnel of participating hospitals (n=305 responses, estimated response rate 30%).InterventionsNone.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPsychometric properties (model fit, internal consistency, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity) of the instrument, factor structure derived from the data.ResultsThe Georgian version of Safety Attitudes Questionnaire demonstrated acceptable construct validity and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.61–0.91). Three factors, Teamwork Climate, Safety Climate and Working Conditions, had limited convergent and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis with the original six-factor model resulted in limited model fit (χ2/df=2.14, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.06, goodness of fit index (GFI)=0.83, CFI=0.88, TLI=0.86). Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a modified four-factor model with satisfactory model fit (χ2/df=2.09, RMSEA=0.06, GFI=0.88, CFI=0.93, TLI=0.91).ConclusionsThe Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (short version) demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, with acceptable to good internal consistency and construct validity. While the whole model had limited fit to the data, a modified factor model resulted in good model fit. Our findings suggest the dimension Working Conditions has questionable psychometric properties and should be interpreted with caution. Other two correlated dimensions Teamwork Climate and Safety Climate share considerable variance and may be merged. Overall, the instrument can provide valuable information relevant for advancement of patient safety culture in Georgian hospitals.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/2/e034863.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicole Ernstmann
Tanja Manser
Nikoloz Gambashidze
Antje Hammer
spellingShingle Nicole Ernstmann
Tanja Manser
Nikoloz Gambashidze
Antje Hammer
Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
BMJ Open
author_facet Nicole Ernstmann
Tanja Manser
Nikoloz Gambashidze
Antje Hammer
author_sort Nicole Ernstmann
title Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
title_short Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
title_full Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
title_sort psychometric properties of the georgian version of the safety attitudes questionnaire: a cross-sectional study
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2020-02-01
description ObjectiveTo study the psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire short version.DesignCross-sectional study.SettingThree Georgian hospitals.ParticipantsPersonnel of participating hospitals (n=305 responses, estimated response rate 30%).InterventionsNone.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPsychometric properties (model fit, internal consistency, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity) of the instrument, factor structure derived from the data.ResultsThe Georgian version of Safety Attitudes Questionnaire demonstrated acceptable construct validity and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.61–0.91). Three factors, Teamwork Climate, Safety Climate and Working Conditions, had limited convergent and discriminant validity. Confirmatory factor analysis with the original six-factor model resulted in limited model fit (χ2/df=2.14, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.06, goodness of fit index (GFI)=0.83, CFI=0.88, TLI=0.86). Exploratory factor analysis resulted in a modified four-factor model with satisfactory model fit (χ2/df=2.09, RMSEA=0.06, GFI=0.88, CFI=0.93, TLI=0.91).ConclusionsThe Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (short version) demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, with acceptable to good internal consistency and construct validity. While the whole model had limited fit to the data, a modified factor model resulted in good model fit. Our findings suggest the dimension Working Conditions has questionable psychometric properties and should be interpreted with caution. Other two correlated dimensions Teamwork Climate and Safety Climate share considerable variance and may be merged. Overall, the instrument can provide valuable information relevant for advancement of patient safety culture in Georgian hospitals.
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/10/2/e034863.full
work_keys_str_mv AT nicoleernstmann psychometricpropertiesofthegeorgianversionofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireacrosssectionalstudy
AT tanjamanser psychometricpropertiesofthegeorgianversionofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireacrosssectionalstudy
AT nikolozgambashidze psychometricpropertiesofthegeorgianversionofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireacrosssectionalstudy
AT antjehammer psychometricpropertiesofthegeorgianversionofthesafetyattitudesquestionnaireacrosssectionalstudy
_version_ 1721246764630016000