Adherence to the iDSI reference case among published cost-per-DALY averted studies.
<h4>Background</h4>The iDSI reference case, originally published in 2014, aims to improve the quality and comparability of cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA). This study assesses whether the development of the guideline is associated with an improvement in methodological and reporting pra...
Main Authors: | Joanna Emerson, Ari Panzer, Joshua T Cohen, Kalipso Chalkidou, Yot Teerawattananon, Mark Sculpher, Thomas Wilkinson, Damian Walker, Peter J Neumann, David D Kim |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2019-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205633 |
Similar Items
-
Comparing the cost-per-QALYs gained and cost-per-DALYs averted literatures [version 1; referees: 3 approved]
by: Peter J. Neumann, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Comparing the cost-per-QALYs gained and cost-per-DALYs averted literatures [version 2; referees: 3 approved]
by: Peter J. Neumann, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Studies Reporting Cost-per-DALY Averted.
by: Peter J Neumann, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Health Technology Assessment capacity development in low- and middle-income countries: Experiences from the international units of HITAP and NICE [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Sripen Tantivess, et al.
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Rival perspectives in health technology assessment and other economic evaluations for investing in global and national health. Who decides? Who pays? [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Anthony Culyer, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)