Quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwaters

Septic tank systems (STS) are a potential source of nutrient emissions to surface waters but few data exist in the UK to quantify their significance for eutrophication. We monitored the impact of STS on nutrient concentrations in a stream network around a typical English village over a 1-year period...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: P.J.A. Withers, H.P. Jarvie, C. Stoate
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2011-04-01
Series:Environment International
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412011000043
id doaj-bce47110f8494551b71ff13d72309070
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bce47110f8494551b71ff13d723090702020-11-24T22:06:37ZengElsevierEnvironment International0160-41202011-04-01373644653Quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwatersP.J.A. Withers0H.P. Jarvie1C. Stoate2School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK; Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1248 382631; fax: +44 1248 354997.Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UKThe Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Allerton Project, Loddington, Leicestershire LE7 9XE, UKSeptic tank systems (STS) are a potential source of nutrient emissions to surface waters but few data exist in the UK to quantify their significance for eutrophication. We monitored the impact of STS on nutrient concentrations in a stream network around a typical English village over a 1-year period. Septic tank effluent discharging via a pipe directly into one stream was highly concentrated in soluble N (8–63 mg L−1) and P (<1–14 mg L−1) and other nutrients (Na, K, Cl, B and Mn) typical of detergent and household inputs. Ammonium-N (NH4N) and soluble reactive P (SRP) fractions were dominant (70–85% of total) and average concentrations of nitrite-N (NO2N) were above levels considered harmful to fish (0.1 mg L−1). Lower nutrient concentrations were recorded at a ditch and a stream site, but range and average values downstream of rural habitation were still 4 to 10-fold greater than those in upstream sections. At the ditch site, where flow volumes were low, annual flow-weighted concentrations of NH4N and SRP increased from 0.04 and 0.07 mg L−1, respectively upstream to 0.55 and 0.21 mg L−1 downstream. At the stream site, flow volumes were twice as large and flow-weighted concentrations increased much less; from 0.04 to 0.21 mg L−1 for NH4N and from 0.06 to 0.08 mg L−1 for SRP. At all sites, largest nutrient concentrations were recorded under low flow and stream discharge was the most important factor determining the eutrophication impact of septic tank systems. The very high concentrations, intercorrelation and dilution patterns of SRP, NH4-N and the effluent markers Na and B suggested that soakaways in the heavy clay catchment soils were not retaining and treating the septic tank effluents efficiently, with profound implications for stream biodiversity. Water companies, water regulators and rural communities therefore need to be made more aware of the potential impacts of STS on water quality so that their management can be optimised to reduce the risk of potential eutrophication and toxicity to aquatic ecosystems during summer low flow periods. Keywords: Septic tank systems, Eutrophication, Phosphorus, Nitrogen, Rural populationshttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412011000043
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author P.J.A. Withers
H.P. Jarvie
C. Stoate
spellingShingle P.J.A. Withers
H.P. Jarvie
C. Stoate
Quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwaters
Environment International
author_facet P.J.A. Withers
H.P. Jarvie
C. Stoate
author_sort P.J.A. Withers
title Quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwaters
title_short Quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwaters
title_full Quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwaters
title_fullStr Quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwaters
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwaters
title_sort quantifying the impact of septic tank systems on eutrophication risk in rural headwaters
publisher Elsevier
series Environment International
issn 0160-4120
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Septic tank systems (STS) are a potential source of nutrient emissions to surface waters but few data exist in the UK to quantify their significance for eutrophication. We monitored the impact of STS on nutrient concentrations in a stream network around a typical English village over a 1-year period. Septic tank effluent discharging via a pipe directly into one stream was highly concentrated in soluble N (8–63 mg L−1) and P (<1–14 mg L−1) and other nutrients (Na, K, Cl, B and Mn) typical of detergent and household inputs. Ammonium-N (NH4N) and soluble reactive P (SRP) fractions were dominant (70–85% of total) and average concentrations of nitrite-N (NO2N) were above levels considered harmful to fish (0.1 mg L−1). Lower nutrient concentrations were recorded at a ditch and a stream site, but range and average values downstream of rural habitation were still 4 to 10-fold greater than those in upstream sections. At the ditch site, where flow volumes were low, annual flow-weighted concentrations of NH4N and SRP increased from 0.04 and 0.07 mg L−1, respectively upstream to 0.55 and 0.21 mg L−1 downstream. At the stream site, flow volumes were twice as large and flow-weighted concentrations increased much less; from 0.04 to 0.21 mg L−1 for NH4N and from 0.06 to 0.08 mg L−1 for SRP. At all sites, largest nutrient concentrations were recorded under low flow and stream discharge was the most important factor determining the eutrophication impact of septic tank systems. The very high concentrations, intercorrelation and dilution patterns of SRP, NH4-N and the effluent markers Na and B suggested that soakaways in the heavy clay catchment soils were not retaining and treating the septic tank effluents efficiently, with profound implications for stream biodiversity. Water companies, water regulators and rural communities therefore need to be made more aware of the potential impacts of STS on water quality so that their management can be optimised to reduce the risk of potential eutrophication and toxicity to aquatic ecosystems during summer low flow periods. Keywords: Septic tank systems, Eutrophication, Phosphorus, Nitrogen, Rural populations
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160412011000043
work_keys_str_mv AT pjawithers quantifyingtheimpactofseptictanksystemsoneutrophicationriskinruralheadwaters
AT hpjarvie quantifyingtheimpactofseptictanksystemsoneutrophicationriskinruralheadwaters
AT cstoate quantifyingtheimpactofseptictanksystemsoneutrophicationriskinruralheadwaters
_version_ 1725822853710872576