Testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markers
Background & Aim: In multivariate receiver operating characteristic (MROC) curve analysis, comparing two tests is usually done by means of area under the curve (AUC’s) and sensitivities. However, the existing procedures have not addressed the issue of comparing two MROC curves when they cross e...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2017-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jbe.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jbe/article/view/129 |
id |
doaj-bce3e065e8f540d980e845b5430aa89d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bce3e065e8f540d980e845b5430aa89d2020-12-06T04:15:21ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology2383-41962383-420X2017-10-0124Testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markersSameera Govindaraju Govindaraju0Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram1Department of Statistics, Ramanujan School of Mathematical Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, IndiaDepartment of Statistics, Ramanujan School of Mathematical Sciences, Pondicherry University, Puducherry, India Background & Aim: In multivariate receiver operating characteristic (MROC) curve analysis, comparing two tests is usually done by means of area under the curve (AUC’s) and sensitivities. However, the existing procedures have not addressed the issue of comparing two MROC curves when they cross each other. Methods & Materials: A modified version of AUC (mAUC) under MROC setup is proposed to address the above-mentioned problem. It is also shown that mAUC performs better than AUC. The performance of mAUC in the aspect of crossover curves is supported by a real dataset and simulation studies at different sample sizes. Results: Two real datasets, namely, Intra Uterine Growth Restricted Fetal Doppler Study (IUGRFDS) and Indian liver patient (ILP) datasets are used and apart from these simulation studies are also carried out to observe the effect of sample size. These mAUC’s are then compared with each other to show that difference exists between two curves while comparing AUC’s cannot identify the true difference existing between them. With respect to IUGRFDS dataset, MROC curves of the diagnostic procedures middle cerebral artery and cerebroplacental ratio cross each other and are found to be similar when their AUC’s and mAUC’s are compared. In ILP dataset, the extent of correct classification achieved in the case of males is shown to be better than that of females when mAUC’s at 0.5 and 0.8 are compared. Conclusion: It is observed that the mAUC’s are competent in identifying the true difference between the crossover MROC curves when the sample size is adequate, and the λ values are 0.5 and 0.8 but not 0.3. https://jbe.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jbe/article/view/129MultivariateArea under the curveCrossing-overMultivariate receiver operating characteristic curve |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Sameera Govindaraju Govindaraju Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram |
spellingShingle |
Sameera Govindaraju Govindaraju Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram Testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markers Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology Multivariate Area under the curve Crossing-over Multivariate receiver operating characteristic curve |
author_facet |
Sameera Govindaraju Govindaraju Vishnu Vardhan Rudravaram |
author_sort |
Sameera Govindaraju Govindaraju |
title |
Testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markers |
title_short |
Testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markers |
title_full |
Testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markers |
title_fullStr |
Testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markers |
title_sort |
testing the significance of crossover receiver operating characteristic curves in the presence of multiple markers |
publisher |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Journal of Biostatistics and Epidemiology |
issn |
2383-4196 2383-420X |
publishDate |
2017-10-01 |
description |
Background & Aim: In multivariate receiver operating characteristic (MROC) curve analysis, comparing two tests is usually done by means of area under the curve (AUC’s) and sensitivities. However, the existing procedures have not addressed the issue of comparing two MROC curves when they cross each other.
Methods & Materials: A modified version of AUC (mAUC) under MROC setup is proposed to address the above-mentioned problem. It is also shown that mAUC performs better than AUC. The performance of mAUC in the aspect of crossover curves is supported by a real dataset and simulation studies at different sample sizes.
Results: Two real datasets, namely, Intra Uterine Growth Restricted Fetal Doppler Study (IUGRFDS) and Indian liver patient (ILP) datasets are used and apart from these simulation studies are also carried out to observe the effect of sample size. These mAUC’s are then compared with each other to show that difference exists between two curves while comparing AUC’s cannot identify the true difference existing between them. With respect to IUGRFDS dataset, MROC curves of the diagnostic procedures middle cerebral artery and cerebroplacental ratio cross each other and are found to be similar when their AUC’s and mAUC’s are compared. In ILP dataset, the extent of correct classification achieved in the case of males is shown to be better than that of females when mAUC’s at 0.5 and 0.8 are compared.
Conclusion: It is observed that the mAUC’s are competent in identifying the true difference between the crossover MROC curves when the sample size is adequate, and the λ values are 0.5 and 0.8 but not 0.3.
|
topic |
Multivariate Area under the curve Crossing-over Multivariate receiver operating characteristic curve |
url |
https://jbe.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jbe/article/view/129 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sameeragovindarajugovindaraju testingthesignificanceofcrossoverreceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurvesinthepresenceofmultiplemarkers AT vishnuvardhanrudravaram testingthesignificanceofcrossoverreceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurvesinthepresenceofmultiplemarkers |
_version_ |
1724399481223380992 |