VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
On 3 February 2011, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (the Polish national competition agency, hereafter referred to as the UOKiK, after the Polish acronym), pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Act of 16 February 2007 on competition and consumer protection1 (hereafter r...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Warsaw
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies |
Online Access: | https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_6/s297.pdf |
id |
doaj-bcd7a770cea1481daba4e3f83bf81719 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bcd7a770cea1481daba4e3f83bf817192020-11-25T04:11:08ZengUniversity of WarsawYearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies1689-90242545-01152012-08-0156297311VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)Mateusz RadomyskiOn 3 February 2011, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (the Polish national competition agency, hereafter referred to as the UOKiK, after the Polish acronym), pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Act of 16 February 2007 on competition and consumer protection1 (hereafter referred to as the Competition Act) and in relation to Articles 13(1) and 13(2)(2) of said Act, issued Decision number DKK-12/11 (hereafter, the Decision). It ruled against the takeover of Merlin.pl S.A. by NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A2 on the basis that ‘the concentration will result in a significant impediment to competition’https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_6/s297.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mateusz Radomyski |
spellingShingle |
Mateusz Radomyski VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011) Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies |
author_facet |
Mateusz Radomyski |
author_sort |
Mateusz Radomyski |
title |
VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011) |
title_short |
VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011) |
title_full |
VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011) |
title_fullStr |
VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011) |
title_full_unstemmed |
VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011) |
title_sort |
vol. 2012, 5(6)the empik and merlin concentration prohibition: would the european commission reach a similar verdict?case comment to the decision of the president of the office for competition and consumer protection of 3 february 2011 – merlin.pl s.a. and nfi empik media & fashion s.a (dkk-12/2011) |
publisher |
University of Warsaw |
series |
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies |
issn |
1689-9024 2545-0115 |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
On 3 February 2011, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (the Polish national competition agency, hereafter referred to as the UOKiK, after the Polish acronym), pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Act of 16 February 2007 on competition and consumer protection1 (hereafter referred to as the Competition Act) and in relation to Articles 13(1) and 13(2)(2) of said Act, issued Decision number DKK-12/11 (hereafter, the Decision). It ruled against the takeover of Merlin.pl S.A. by NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A2 on the basis that ‘the concentration will result in a significant impediment to competition’ |
url |
https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_6/s297.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mateuszradomyski vol201256theempikandmerlinconcentrationprohibitionwouldtheeuropeancommissionreachasimilarverdictcasecommenttothedecisionofthepresidentoftheofficeforcompetitionandconsumerprotectionof3february2011merlinplsaandnfiempikmediafashionsadkk122011 |
_version_ |
1724418725647482880 |