VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)

On 3 February 2011, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (the Polish national competition agency, hereafter referred to as the UOKiK, after the Polish acronym), pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Act of 16 February 2007 on competition and consumer protection1 (hereafter r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mateusz Radomyski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Warsaw 2012-08-01
Series:Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
Online Access:https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_6/s297.pdf
id doaj-bcd7a770cea1481daba4e3f83bf81719
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bcd7a770cea1481daba4e3f83bf817192020-11-25T04:11:08ZengUniversity of WarsawYearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies1689-90242545-01152012-08-0156297311VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)Mateusz RadomyskiOn 3 February 2011, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (the Polish national competition agency, hereafter referred to as the UOKiK, after the Polish acronym), pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Act of 16 February 2007 on competition and consumer protection1 (hereafter referred to as the Competition Act) and in relation to Articles 13(1) and 13(2)(2) of said Act, issued Decision number DKK-12/11 (hereafter, the Decision). It ruled against the takeover of Merlin.pl S.A. by NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A2 on the basis that ‘the concentration will result in a significant impediment to competition’https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_6/s297.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mateusz Radomyski
spellingShingle Mateusz Radomyski
VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
author_facet Mateusz Radomyski
author_sort Mateusz Radomyski
title VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
title_short VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
title_full VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
title_fullStr VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
title_full_unstemmed VOL. 2012, 5(6)The EMPiK and Merlin concentration prohibition: Would the European Commission reach a similar verdict?Case comment to the decision of the President of the Office for Competition and Consumer Protection of 3 February 2011 – Merlin.pl S.A. and NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A (DKK-12/2011)
title_sort vol. 2012, 5(6)the empik and merlin concentration prohibition: would the european commission reach a similar verdict?case comment to the decision of the president of the office for competition and consumer protection of 3 february 2011 – merlin.pl s.a. and nfi empik media & fashion s.a (dkk-12/2011)
publisher University of Warsaw
series Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
issn 1689-9024
2545-0115
publishDate 2012-08-01
description On 3 February 2011, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection (the Polish national competition agency, hereafter referred to as the UOKiK, after the Polish acronym), pursuant to Article 20(1) of the Act of 16 February 2007 on competition and consumer protection1 (hereafter referred to as the Competition Act) and in relation to Articles 13(1) and 13(2)(2) of said Act, issued Decision number DKK-12/11 (hereafter, the Decision). It ruled against the takeover of Merlin.pl S.A. by NFI EMPiK Media & Fashion S.A2 on the basis that ‘the concentration will result in a significant impediment to competition’
url https://yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/images/yars2012_5_6/s297.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mateuszradomyski vol201256theempikandmerlinconcentrationprohibitionwouldtheeuropeancommissionreachasimilarverdictcasecommenttothedecisionofthepresidentoftheofficeforcompetitionandconsumerprotectionof3february2011merlinplsaandnfiempikmediafashionsadkk122011
_version_ 1724418725647482880