Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery

Plant phenology regulates ecosystem services at local and global scales and is a sensitive indicator of global change. Estimates of phenophase transition dates, such as the start of spring or end of fall, can be derived from sensor-based time series, but must be interpreted in terms of biologically...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. T. Klosterman, K. Hufkens, J. M. Gray, E. Melaas, O. Sonnentag, I. Lavine, L. Mitchell, R. Norman, M. A. Friedl, A. D. Richardson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2014-08-01
Series:Biogeosciences
Online Access:http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/4305/2014/bg-11-4305-2014.pdf
id doaj-bcca4b83e5c147d49cc2f86be908b384
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bcca4b83e5c147d49cc2f86be908b3842020-11-24T22:35:54ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892014-08-0111164305432010.5194/bg-11-4305-2014Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imageryS. T. Klosterman0K. Hufkens1J. M. Gray2E. Melaas3O. Sonnentag4I. Lavine5L. Mitchell6R. Norman7M. A. Friedl8A. D. Richardson9Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USADepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USADepartment of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USADepartment of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USADepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USALafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USALincoln University, Jefferson City, MO 65101, USAThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USADepartment of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USADepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USAPlant phenology regulates ecosystem services at local and global scales and is a sensitive indicator of global change. Estimates of phenophase transition dates, such as the start of spring or end of fall, can be derived from sensor-based time series, but must be interpreted in terms of biologically relevant events. We use the PhenoCam archive of digital repeat photography to implement a consistent protocol for visual assessment of canopy phenology at 13 temperate deciduous forest sites throughout eastern North America, and to perform digital image analysis for time-series-based estimation of phenophase transition dates. We then compare these results to remote sensing metrics of phenophase transition dates derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors. We present a new type of curve fit that uses a generalized sigmoid function to estimate phenology dates, and we quantify the statistical uncertainty of phenophase transition dates estimated using this method. Results show that the generalized sigmoid provides estimates of dates with less statistical uncertainty than other curve-fitting methods. Additionally, we find that dates derived from analysis of high-frequency PhenoCam imagery have smaller uncertainties than satellite remote sensing metrics of phenology, and that dates derived from the remotely sensed enhanced vegetation index (EVI) have smaller uncertainty than those derived from the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Near-surface time-series estimates for the start of spring are found to closely match estimates derived from visual assessment of leaf-out, as well as satellite remote-sensing-derived estimates of the start of spring. However late spring and fall phenology metrics exhibit larger differences between near-surface and remote scales. Differences in late spring phenology between near-surface and remote scales are found to correlate with a landscape metric of deciduous forest cover. These results quantify the effect of landscape heterogeneity when aggregating to the coarser spatial scales of remote sensing, and demonstrate the importance of accurate curve fitting and vegetation index selection when analyzing and interpreting phenology time series.http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/4305/2014/bg-11-4305-2014.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. T. Klosterman
K. Hufkens
J. M. Gray
E. Melaas
O. Sonnentag
I. Lavine
L. Mitchell
R. Norman
M. A. Friedl
A. D. Richardson
spellingShingle S. T. Klosterman
K. Hufkens
J. M. Gray
E. Melaas
O. Sonnentag
I. Lavine
L. Mitchell
R. Norman
M. A. Friedl
A. D. Richardson
Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery
Biogeosciences
author_facet S. T. Klosterman
K. Hufkens
J. M. Gray
E. Melaas
O. Sonnentag
I. Lavine
L. Mitchell
R. Norman
M. A. Friedl
A. D. Richardson
author_sort S. T. Klosterman
title Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery
title_short Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery
title_full Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery
title_fullStr Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery
title_sort evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using phenocam imagery
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Biogeosciences
issn 1726-4170
1726-4189
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Plant phenology regulates ecosystem services at local and global scales and is a sensitive indicator of global change. Estimates of phenophase transition dates, such as the start of spring or end of fall, can be derived from sensor-based time series, but must be interpreted in terms of biologically relevant events. We use the PhenoCam archive of digital repeat photography to implement a consistent protocol for visual assessment of canopy phenology at 13 temperate deciduous forest sites throughout eastern North America, and to perform digital image analysis for time-series-based estimation of phenophase transition dates. We then compare these results to remote sensing metrics of phenophase transition dates derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors. We present a new type of curve fit that uses a generalized sigmoid function to estimate phenology dates, and we quantify the statistical uncertainty of phenophase transition dates estimated using this method. Results show that the generalized sigmoid provides estimates of dates with less statistical uncertainty than other curve-fitting methods. Additionally, we find that dates derived from analysis of high-frequency PhenoCam imagery have smaller uncertainties than satellite remote sensing metrics of phenology, and that dates derived from the remotely sensed enhanced vegetation index (EVI) have smaller uncertainty than those derived from the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Near-surface time-series estimates for the start of spring are found to closely match estimates derived from visual assessment of leaf-out, as well as satellite remote-sensing-derived estimates of the start of spring. However late spring and fall phenology metrics exhibit larger differences between near-surface and remote scales. Differences in late spring phenology between near-surface and remote scales are found to correlate with a landscape metric of deciduous forest cover. These results quantify the effect of landscape heterogeneity when aggregating to the coarser spatial scales of remote sensing, and demonstrate the importance of accurate curve fitting and vegetation index selection when analyzing and interpreting phenology time series.
url http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/4305/2014/bg-11-4305-2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT stklosterman evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT khufkens evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT jmgray evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT emelaas evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT osonnentag evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT ilavine evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT lmitchell evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT rnorman evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT mafriedl evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
AT adrichardson evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery
_version_ 1725722317252722688