Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery
Plant phenology regulates ecosystem services at local and global scales and is a sensitive indicator of global change. Estimates of phenophase transition dates, such as the start of spring or end of fall, can be derived from sensor-based time series, but must be interpreted in terms of biologically...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2014-08-01
|
Series: | Biogeosciences |
Online Access: | http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/4305/2014/bg-11-4305-2014.pdf |
id |
doaj-bcca4b83e5c147d49cc2f86be908b384 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-bcca4b83e5c147d49cc2f86be908b3842020-11-24T22:35:54ZengCopernicus PublicationsBiogeosciences1726-41701726-41892014-08-0111164305432010.5194/bg-11-4305-2014Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imageryS. T. Klosterman0K. Hufkens1J. M. Gray2E. Melaas3O. Sonnentag4I. Lavine5L. Mitchell6R. Norman7M. A. Friedl8A. D. Richardson9Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USADepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USADepartment of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USADepartment of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USADepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USALafayette College, Easton, PA 18042, USALincoln University, Jefferson City, MO 65101, USAThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USADepartment of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USADepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USAPlant phenology regulates ecosystem services at local and global scales and is a sensitive indicator of global change. Estimates of phenophase transition dates, such as the start of spring or end of fall, can be derived from sensor-based time series, but must be interpreted in terms of biologically relevant events. We use the PhenoCam archive of digital repeat photography to implement a consistent protocol for visual assessment of canopy phenology at 13 temperate deciduous forest sites throughout eastern North America, and to perform digital image analysis for time-series-based estimation of phenophase transition dates. We then compare these results to remote sensing metrics of phenophase transition dates derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors. We present a new type of curve fit that uses a generalized sigmoid function to estimate phenology dates, and we quantify the statistical uncertainty of phenophase transition dates estimated using this method. Results show that the generalized sigmoid provides estimates of dates with less statistical uncertainty than other curve-fitting methods. Additionally, we find that dates derived from analysis of high-frequency PhenoCam imagery have smaller uncertainties than satellite remote sensing metrics of phenology, and that dates derived from the remotely sensed enhanced vegetation index (EVI) have smaller uncertainty than those derived from the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). Near-surface time-series estimates for the start of spring are found to closely match estimates derived from visual assessment of leaf-out, as well as satellite remote-sensing-derived estimates of the start of spring. However late spring and fall phenology metrics exhibit larger differences between near-surface and remote scales. Differences in late spring phenology between near-surface and remote scales are found to correlate with a landscape metric of deciduous forest cover. These results quantify the effect of landscape heterogeneity when aggregating to the coarser spatial scales of remote sensing, and demonstrate the importance of accurate curve fitting and vegetation index selection when analyzing and interpreting phenology time series.http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/4305/2014/bg-11-4305-2014.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
S. T. Klosterman K. Hufkens J. M. Gray E. Melaas O. Sonnentag I. Lavine L. Mitchell R. Norman M. A. Friedl A. D. Richardson |
spellingShingle |
S. T. Klosterman K. Hufkens J. M. Gray E. Melaas O. Sonnentag I. Lavine L. Mitchell R. Norman M. A. Friedl A. D. Richardson Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery Biogeosciences |
author_facet |
S. T. Klosterman K. Hufkens J. M. Gray E. Melaas O. Sonnentag I. Lavine L. Mitchell R. Norman M. A. Friedl A. D. Richardson |
author_sort |
S. T. Klosterman |
title |
Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery |
title_short |
Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery |
title_full |
Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery |
title_sort |
evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using phenocam imagery |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Biogeosciences |
issn |
1726-4170 1726-4189 |
publishDate |
2014-08-01 |
description |
Plant phenology regulates ecosystem services at local and global scales and
is a sensitive indicator of global change. Estimates of phenophase
transition dates, such as the start of spring or end of fall, can be
derived from sensor-based time series, but must be interpreted in terms of
biologically relevant events. We use the PhenoCam archive of digital repeat
photography to implement a consistent protocol for visual assessment of
canopy phenology at 13 temperate deciduous forest sites throughout eastern
North America, and to perform digital image analysis for time-series-based
estimation of phenophase transition dates. We then compare these results to
remote sensing metrics of phenophase transition dates derived from the
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and Advanced Very High
Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensors. We present a new type of curve fit
that uses a generalized sigmoid function to estimate phenology dates, and we
quantify the statistical uncertainty of phenophase transition dates
estimated using this method. Results show that the generalized sigmoid
provides estimates of dates with less statistical uncertainty than other
curve-fitting methods. Additionally, we find that dates derived from
analysis of high-frequency PhenoCam imagery have smaller uncertainties than
satellite remote sensing metrics of phenology, and that dates derived from
the remotely sensed enhanced vegetation index (EVI) have smaller uncertainty
than those derived from the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI).
Near-surface time-series estimates for the start of spring are found to
closely match estimates derived from visual assessment of leaf-out, as well
as satellite remote-sensing-derived estimates of the start of spring.
However late spring and fall phenology metrics exhibit larger differences
between near-surface and remote scales. Differences in late spring phenology
between near-surface and remote scales are found to correlate with a
landscape metric of deciduous forest cover. These results quantify the
effect of landscape heterogeneity when aggregating to the coarser spatial
scales of remote sensing, and demonstrate the importance of accurate curve
fitting and vegetation index selection when analyzing and interpreting
phenology time series. |
url |
http://www.biogeosciences.net/11/4305/2014/bg-11-4305-2014.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT stklosterman evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT khufkens evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT jmgray evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT emelaas evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT osonnentag evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT ilavine evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT lmitchell evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT rnorman evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT mafriedl evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery AT adrichardson evaluatingremotesensingofdeciduousforestphenologyatmultiplespatialscalesusingphenocamimagery |
_version_ |
1725722317252722688 |